ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Practical Guide to Qualitative Analysis | Radiology | JAMA Surgery | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Smith  ME, Wells  EE, Friese  CR, Krein  SL, Ghaferi  AA.  Interpersonal and organizational dynamics are key drivers of failure to rescue.  Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(11):1870-1876. doi:
2.
Kummerow Broman  K, Ward  MJ, Poulose  BK, Schwarze  ML.  Surgical transfer decision making: how regional resources are allocated in a regional transfer network.  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018;44(1):33-42. doi:
3.
Elfenbein  DM.  Confidence crisis among general surgery residents: a systematic review and qualitative discourse analysis.  JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1166-1175. doi:
4.
Taylor  LJ, Nabozny  MJ, Steffens  NM,  et al.  A framework to improve surgeon communication in high-stakes surgical decisions: best case/worst case.  JAMA Surg. 2017;152(6):531-538. doi:
5.
Zimmermann  CJ, Baggett  ND, Taylor  LJ,  et al.  Family and transplant professionals’ views of organ recovery before circulatory death for imminently dying patients: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups.  Am J Transplant. 2019;19(8):2232-2240. doi:
6.
Miles  MB, Huberman  AM, Saldaña  J.  Qualitative Data Analysis: a Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2014.
7.
Tong  A, Sainsbury  P, Craig  J.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.  Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-357. doi:
8.
Murphy  E, Dingwall  R, Greatbatch  D, Parker  S, Watson  P.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature.  Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(16):iii-ix, 1-274. doi:
Views 3,785
Guide to Statistics and Methods
January 29, 2020

Practical Guide to Qualitative Analysis

Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Wisconsin Department of Surgery, Madison
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California
  • 3David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Torrance
  • 4University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor
JAMA Surg. 2020;155(3):252-253. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4385

While we love the allure of large numbers and the confidence instilled by small P values, we should remember that within the variables we count, there is variation and nuance that can be critically important to our understanding of how we provide surgical care and ways to improve it.1 Unlike most quantitative methods that provide a 50 000-foot view, qualitative analysis starts from the ground and moves up. While we undoubtedly gain valuable knowledge from quantitative analyses, the goal of qualitative research is to understand not just how often, but why and how a phenomenon occurs by describing in rich detail procedures, processes, and relationships. Particularly in clinical domains like surgery, even the most advanced quantitative methods and the use of big data will leave us with residual questions about how to identify a specific path forward to address study findings. Thus, qualitative analysis can expose critical details and characterize events and concepts.

×