ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Practical Guide to Meta-analysis | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA Surgery | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Moher  D, Liberati  A, Tetzlaff  J, Altman  DG; PRISMA Group.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.  Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2009;339:b2535. doi:
2.
Stroup  DF, Berlin  JA, Morton  SC,  et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.  Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡. 2000;283(15):2008-2012. doi:
3.
Higgins  JPT, Green  S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2. . Updated September 2009. Accessed December 15, 2019.
4.
Viswanathan  M, Ansari  MT, Berkman  ND,  et al. Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. In:  Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
5.
Bax  L, Yu  L-M, Ikeda  N, Moons  KGM.  A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies.   BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:40-40. doi:
6.
DerSimonian  R, Laird  N.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.   Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-188. doi:
7.
Borenstein  M, Hedges  LV, Higgins  JP, Rothstein  HR. Identifying and quantifying heterogeneity. In:  Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2009.
8.
Gagnier  JJ, Morgenstern  H, Altman  DG,  et al; Ann Arbor Clinical Heterogeneity Consensus Group.  Consensus-based recommendations for investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews.   BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:106. doi:
9.
Arya  S, Pipinos  II, Garg  N, Johanning  J, Lynch  TG, Longo  GM.  Carotid endarterectomy is superior to carotid angioplasty and stenting for perioperative and long-term results.   Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011;45(6):490-498. doi:
10.
Sahebally  SM, McKevitt  K, Stephens  I,  et al.  Negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy incisions in general and colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Surg. 2018;153(11):e183467. doi:
Views 5,179
Guide to Statistics and Methods
January 29, 2020

Practical Guide to Meta-analysis

Author Affiliations
  • 1Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement, Research and Education (S-SPIRE) Center, Palo Alto, California
  • 2Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
  • 3Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
JAMA Surg. 2020;155(5):430-431. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4523

Meta-analysis is a systematic approach of synthesizing, combining, and analyzing data from multiple studies (randomized clinical trials1 or observational studies2) into a single effect estimate to answer a research question. Meta-analysis is especially useful if there is debate around the research question in the literature published to date or the individual published studies are underpowered. Vital to a high-quality meta-analysis is a comprehensive literature search, prespecified hypothesis and aims, reporting of study quality, consideration of heterogeneity and examination of bias. In the hierarchy of evidence, meta-analysis appears above observational studies and randomized clinical trials because it rigorously collates evidence across a larger body of literature; however, meta-analysis is largely dependent on the quality of the primary data.

×