ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Practical Guide to Health Policy Evaluation Using Observational Data | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA Surgery | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Basu  S, Meghani  A, Siddiqi  A.  Evaluating the health impact of large-scale public policy changes: classical and novel approaches.   Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:351-370. doi:
2.
Scott  JW, Neiman  PU, Uribe-Leitz  T,  et al.  Impact of Affordable Care Act–related insurance expansion policies on mortality and access to post-discharge care for trauma patients: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.   J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;86(2):196-205. doi:
3.
Zogg  CK, Scott  JW, Metcalfe  D,  et al.  Association of Medicaid expansion with access to rehabilitative care in adult trauma patients.  Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Surg. 2019;154(5):402-411. doi:
4.
Loehrer  AP, Chang  DC, Scott  JW,  et al.  Association of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion with access to and quality of care for surgical conditions  [published online March 21, 2018]. Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Surg. 2018;153(3):e175568. doi:
5.
Scott  JW, Salim  A, Sommers  BD, Tsai  TC, Scott  KW, Song  Z.  Racial and regional disparities in the effect of the Affordable Care Act’s dependent coverage provision on young adult trauma patients.   J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):495-501.e1. doi:
6.
Dimick  JB, Ryan  AM.  Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.  Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡. 2014;312(22):2401-2402. doi:
7.
von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.   PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296. doi:
Views 2,694
Guide to Statistics and Methods
January 29, 2020

Practical Guide to Health Policy Evaluation Using Observational Data

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 2Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 3Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
JAMA Surg. 2020;155(4):353-354. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4398

The fundamental goal of policy analysis is to understand the effect of an intervention on patients, health care professionals, or hospitals. Although a randomized controlled design is considered the criterion standard for isolating a causal effect, such a design is rarely plausible in health policy evaluation. As such, researchers often rely on observational data to evaluate a policy’s consequences.1 For example, recent analyses of the association of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) with outcomes for surgical patients have shown important gains in insurance coverage, timely access to care, and increased rehabilitation facility access after discharge.2-4 While analyses of observational data alone cannot determine causality, valuable evidence regarding their impact can be drawn when applying best analytic practices from across academic disciplines.1

×