ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Practical Guide to Education Program Evaluation Research | Medical Education and Training | JAMA Surgery | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Borman  GD.  Experiments for educational evaluation and improvement.   Peabody J Educ. 2002;77(4):7-27. doi:
2.
Borman  GD, Hewes  GM, Overman  LT, Brown  S.  Comprehensive school reform and achievement: a meta-analysis.   Rev Educ Res. 2003;73(2):125-230. doi:
3.
Battista  A, Yoon  M, Matthew Ritter  E, Nestel  D. Demystifying Program Evaluation for Surgical Education. In: Nestel  D, Dalrymple  K, Paige  J, Aggarwal  R, eds.  Advancing Surgical Education: Innovation and Change in Professional Education. Vol 17. Springer; 2019. doi:
4.
Dick  W, Carey  L, Carey  JO.  The Systematic Design of Instruction. 9th ed. Pearson, University of South Florida; 2022.
5.
Grembowski  D.  The Practice of Health Program Evaluation. 2nd ed. Sage Publications; 2016.
Guide to Statistics and Methods
Surgical Education Research
January 3, 2024

Practical Guide to Education Program Evaluation Research

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora
  • 3Statistical Editor, JAMA Surgery
  • 4Department of Surgery, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston University, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Surg. 2024;159(6):706-707. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6702

Program evaluation is the systematic assessment of a program’s implementation. In medical education, evaluation includes the synthesis and analysis of educational programs, which in turn provides evidence for educational best practices. In medical education, as in other fields, the quality of the synthesis is dependent on the rigor by which evaluations are performed. Individual program evaluation is best achieved when similar programs apply the same scientific rigor and methodology to assess outcomes, thus allowing for direct comparisons. The pedagogy of a given program, particularly in medical education, can be driven by nonscientific forces (ie, political, faddism, or ideology) rather than evidence.1 This often impedes more rapid progress of educational methods to achieve an educational goal compared with a more evidence-based practice.2

×