ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Retinopathy After Epiretinal Membrane Peeling | Ophthalmology | JAMA Ophthalmology | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Ophthalmic Images
±·´Ç±¹±ð³¾²ú±ð°ùÌý21, 2024

Retinopathy After Epiretinal Membrane Peeling

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024;142(11):e244290. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4290

An 84-year-old man underwent vitreoretinal surgery for an epiretinal membrane (ERM). His decimal best-corrected visual acuity was 0.7 (20/32) OD (Figure, A). During surgery, both the ERM and internal limiting membrane (ILM) were peeled in 1 continuous piece. The firmness of the ERM was judged normal with no engagement sites.

Figure.  

A, Preoperative fundus photograph showing an epiretinal membrane. Lower insert: preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) image. B, Postoperative fundus photograph shows retinal whitening. Lower left, OCT showing degeneration of the inner and outer retinal layers. Lower right, fluorescein angiogram showing normal circulation.

One day after the surgery, a white lesion appeared in the peeled area (Figure, B). This lesion was hyperreflective across all layers in the optical coherence tomographic images, with normal retinal circulation on fluorescein angiography (Figure, B), and the patient developed degeneration of the inner and outer retinal layers. The white lesion gradually blended into the surrounding normal tissue, but the border remained throughout the follow-up period. The postoperative best-corrected visual acuity improved to 0.9 (20/25) OD, although he reported a circular visual field defect.

The pattern suggested a maculopathy associated with mechanical trauma from peeling rather than a vascular occlusion.1-5

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Koju Kamoi, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan (koju.oph@tmd.ac.jp).

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Additional Contributions: We thank the patient for granting permission to publish this information.

References
1.
Chua  PY, Sandinha  MT, Steel  DH.  Idiopathic epiretinal membrane: progression and timing of surgery.   Eye (Lond). 2022;36(3):495-503. doi:
2.
Belin  PJ, Parke  DW  III.  Complications of vitreoretinal surgery.   Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31(3):167-173. doi:
3.
Tadayoni  R, Paques  M, Massin  P, Mouki-Benani  S, Mikol  J, Gaudric  A.  Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal.  Ìý°¿±è³ó³Ù³ó²¹±ô³¾´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 2001;108(12):2279-2283. doi:
4.
Sarraf  D, Rahimy  E, Fawzi  AA,  et al.  Paracentral acute middle maculopathy: a new variant of acute macular neuroretinopathy associated with retinal capillary ischemia.   JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(10):1275-1287. doi:
5.
Thomas  AS, Thomas  MK, Davis  EC,  et al.  A Comparison of peel-induced maculopathy following ILM peeling using a microvacuum pick vs forceps.   Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2023;54(1):37-42. doi:
×