ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA Surgery | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Rhee  P, Joseph  B, Pandit  V,  et al.  Increasing trauma deaths in the United States.  Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):13-21.
2.
Champion  HR, Copes  WS, Sacco  WJ,  et al.  The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care.  J Trauma. 1990;30(11):1356-1365.
3.
American College of Surgeons. National trauma data standard. . Accessed July 24, 2017.
4.
American College of Surgeons. National Trauma Data Bank research data set user manual and variable description list. . Accessed July 24, 2017.
5.
Galvagno  SM  Jr, Haut  ER, Zafar  SN,  et al.  Association between helicopter vs ground emergency medical services and survival for adults with major trauma. Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡. 2012;307(15):1602-1610.
6.
Haider  AH, Hashmi  ZG, Zafar  SN,  et al.  Developing best practices to study trauma outcomes in large databases: an evidence-based approach to determine the best mortality risk adjustment model.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(4):1061-1069.
7.
Kozar  RA, Holcomb  JB, Xiong  W, Nathens  AB.  Are all deaths recorded equally? The impact of hospice care on risk-adjusted mortality.  J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(3):634-639.
8.
Gomez  D, Haas  B, Hemmila  M,  et al.  Hips can lie: impact of excluding isolated hip fractures on external benchmarking of trauma center performance.  J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1037-1041.
9.
Oyetunji  TA, Crompton  JG, Ehanire  ID,  et al.  Multiple imputation in trauma disparity research.  J Surg Res. 2011;165(1):e37-e41.
10.
Haider  AH, Hashmi  ZG, Zafar  SN,  et al.  Minority trauma patients tend to cluster at trauma centers with worse-than-expected mortality: can this phenomenon help explain racial disparities in trauma outcomes?  Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):572-579. doi:
Views 3,525
Guide to Statistics and Methods
³§±ð±è³Ù±ð³¾²ú±ð°ùÌý2018

Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB)

Author Affiliations
  • 1Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Department of Surgery, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
  • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-University of California–Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance
  • 4Statistical Editor, JAMA Surgery
  • 5Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 6American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA Surg. 2018;153(9):852-853. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0483

Trauma remains a leading cause of death and disability and accounts for a substantial portion of health care expenditures.1 Therefore, research to improve trauma care is a leading public health priority.

Spearheading this effort, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma coordinated a landmark multi-institutional endeavor, the Major Trauma Outcomes Study.2 On its completion in 1989, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recognized the importance of national trauma data aggregation to inform quality improvement. In 1997, it formed a subcommittee to develop the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), a standardized collection of national trauma data (Box). Today, to our knowledge, the NTDB is the world’s largest trauma data repository, with more than 7.5 million electronic records from more than 900 trauma centers.

×