ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Can We Do Better for Submacular Hemorrhage in Neovascular AMD? | JAMA Ophthalmology | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Invited Commentary
°¿³¦³Ù´Ç²ú±ð°ùÌý17, 2024

Can We Do Better for Submacular Hemorrhage in Neovascular AMD?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
JAMA Ophthalmol. Published online October 17, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.4378

The topic of this commentary hits close to home, as a patient of mine recently developed a submacular hemorrhage (SMH). This is a dreaded condition, not only because of the negative impact it can have on visual prognosis but because of its acute and unpredictable presentation in an era where remarkably effective treatments for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) otherwise exist. Anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal injections have contributed to the growing number of patients with neovascular AMD living with excellent visual acuity (VA). But SMH can rob patients, like mine, of their vision. Thus, the quest to identify optimal treatment continues, propelled by studies like the one published by Murphy et al1 in this issue of JAMA Ophthalmology.

×