ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Harming Health by Imposing In-Prison Co-Payments | Health Care Economics, Insurance, Payment | JAMA Internal Medicine | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Invited Commentary
August 5, 2024

Harming Health by Imposing In-Prison Co-Payments

Author Affiliations
  • 1SEICHE Center for Health and Justice, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
  • 2The Arthur Liman Center for Public Interest Law, Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut
JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(10):1184-1185. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.3572

Although attention has been paid to the massive number of people incarcerated in the US, the health systems within this sprawling detention system have largely been obscured from public attention. In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Lupez and colleagues1 use data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates and find that, compared to 2004, the prevalence of physical and mental health conditions increased, as had the number of people who reported a need for medical care but did not obtain services. Across health conditions, the percentage of people who reported not using needed health services while incarcerated ranged from 9% of pregnant people who had no obstetric examination to 43% of people with chronic mental health conditions.

1 Comment for this article
EXPAND ALL
Another Thought on Co-Pay
Charles Lee, MD, JD, MBA | American College of Correctional Physicians
Thank you for an article addressing an important issue in correctional health care. In general, I agree with the concepts. I have surveyed nearly 200 correctional facilities in 46 states and interviewed countless health care workers and detainees. One topic I invariably discuss is co-pay. Prior to COVID most of the facilities I visited had a co-pay ranging from $2-$25. During COVID many facilities discontinued them, because of the severity of the disease in confining facilities. When the COVID challenges in correctional facilities lessen, some facilities reinstated their co-pay. Co-pay not only has an effect on those detained; but may follow them in the community affecting rehabilitation. It has been shown that co-pay may cost more to manage than the money collected. So, why have a co-pay? Eliminating co-pay is not fraught without unintended consequences.

Invariably, those facilities who had co-pay and continued to eliminate it, the health care requests have significantly increased. Some requests are minor and/or frivolous. The mind set of those incarcerated is very interesting as the Netflix series "Unlocked: A Jail Experiment" shows. On quite a few occasions a detainee has submitted a sick-call request for other than medical reasons. Yes, persons incarcerated do manipulate. Non-medical reasons include an opportunity to get out of the cell, opportunity to see and talk to a female, opportunity to community with other detainees, possibly gang members, opportunity to retaliate on someone, and many others.

In every facility I visited, the medical staff acknowledges co-pay as a significant concern and most suggest a reasonable copay.

Solutions:
1) No copay for chronic medical conditions
2) No co-pay for follow-up of the same condition
3) No co-pay for mental health
4) No co-pay for emergencies
5) Debt zeroed out upon release
6) Reasonable (~$2?) co-pay for routine medical & dental care

There are pros & cons (no pun intended) to the co-pay issue. In light of the shortage of correctional health care personnel, these issues must be considered.

These comments are my own and do not reflect the opinion of The American College of Correctional Physicians. Your comments are welcomed.

Charles D Lee, MD JD, MBA
25 year correctional physician
Radlaw@aol.com
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
×