To the Editor We are writing in response to the systematic review and meta-analysis by Teja et al¹ who aimed to provide current rates of complications associated with central venous catheters (CVCs). The authors’ rigorous approach to data extraction and synthesis is commendable, and their findings certainly contribute valuable insights. However, we would like to present additional points for consideration.

First, the review criteria¹ excluded studies that evaluated long-term intravascular devices and dialysis catheters not typically used for medication administration. Although the focus on short-term CVCs provided a specific scope, it limits the overall understanding of CVC-associated complications across different types, uses, and durations of catheterization. A comprehensive analysis encompassing different types of CVCs could provide more complete information beneficial for clinical decision-making.