ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism—Understanding in Evolution | Venous Thromboembolism | JAMA Surgery | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Invited Commentary
July 31, 2024

Pediatric Venous Thromboembolism—Understanding in Evolution

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • 2Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas
  • 3Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
JAMA Surg. 2024;159(10):1156-1157. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2488

The physiology of pediatric trauma patients leads to lower deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) event rates than adults.1 This makes developing guidelines and tracking the effectiveness of chemical VTE prophylaxis (cVTE) challenging.

In this issue of JAMA Surgery, the Midwestern Pediatric Surgical Consortium implemented and prospectively examined a cVTE protocol for high-risk pediatric trauma patients. The authors administered cVTE in 54.5% of qualified patients. They found that VTE occurred in 1.6% and 6.9% of patients, if cVTE was given less than 24 hours and more than 24 hours, respectively, and in 5.3% of patients if cVTE was never given (P = .31), without increasing bleeding complications.2 This is the first prospective, multicentered study establishing the risk of VTE in a large population with and without cVTE and demonstrating the safety of cVTE in those patients who received prophylaxis.

×