ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Prediction Models for Suicide Attempts and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Simulation | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA Psychiatry | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. ÌýNumbers and proportions of US military members in treatment for mental disorders over time, active component, January 2000-September 2013.ÌýÌý²Ñ³§²Ñ¸é. 2014;21(5):2-7.
2.
Corr ÌýWP ÌýIII. ÌýSuicides and suicide attempts among active component members of the US Armed Forces, 2010-2012; methods of self-harm vary by major geographic region of assignment.ÌýÌý²Ñ³§²Ñ¸é. 2014;21(10):2-5.
3.
Anglemyer ÌýA, Miller ÌýML, Buttrey ÌýS, Whitaker ÌýL. ÌýSuicide rates and methods in active duty military personnel, 2005 to 2011: a cohort study.ÌýÌýAnn Intern Med. 2016;165(3):167-174. doi:
4.
Pruitt ÌýLD, Smolenski ÌýDJ, Bush ÌýNE, Skopp ÌýNA, Hoyt ÌýTV, Grady ÌýBJ. ÌýDepartment of Defense Suicide Event Report: Calendar Year 2015 Annual Report. Washington, DC: Department of Defense; 2016.
5.
Schoenbaum ÌýM, Kessler ÌýRC, Gilman ÌýSE, Ìýet al; Army STARRS Collaborators. ÌýPredictors of suicide and accident death in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS): results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).ÌýÌýJAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(5):493-503. doi:
6.
Pruitt ÌýLD, Smolenski ÌýDJ, Bush ÌýNE, Skopp ÌýNA, Edwards-Stewart ÌýA, Hoyt ÌýTV. ÌýDepartment of Defense Suicide Event Report: Calendar Year 2016 Annual Report. Washington, DC: Department of Defense; 2017.
7.
ÌýVA National Suicide Data Report: 2005-2015. Washington, DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs; 2018.
8.
ÌýSupporting our veterans during their transition from uniformed service to civilian life.ÌýÌýFederal Register. 2018;83(9):1513-1514.
9.
Franklin ÌýJC, Ribeiro ÌýJD, Fox ÌýKR, Ìýet al. ÌýRisk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research.ÌýÌýPsychol Bull. 2017;143(2):187-232. doi:
10.
Runeson ÌýB, Odeberg ÌýJ, Pettersson ÌýA, Edbom ÌýT, Jildevik Adamsson ÌýI, Waern ÌýM.ÌýInstruments for the assessment of suicide risk: a systematic review evaluating the certainty of the evidence.ÌýÌýPLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180292. doi:
11.
Carter ÌýG, Milner ÌýA, McGill ÌýK, Pirkis ÌýJ, Kapur ÌýN, Spittal ÌýMJ. ÌýPredicting suicidal behaviours using clinical instruments: systematic review and meta-analysis of positive predictive values for risk scales.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 2017;210(6):387-395. doi:
12.
LeFevre ÌýML; US Preventive Services Task Force. ÌýScreening for suicide risk in adolescents, adults, and older adults in primary care: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.ÌýÌýAnn Intern Med. 2014;160(10):719-726. doi:
13.
The Joint Commission. ÌýDetecting and treating suicide ideation in all settings.ÌýÌýSentinel Event Alert. 2016;56(56):1-7.
14.
Hogan ÌýMF, Grumet ÌýJG. ÌýSuicide prevention: an emerging priority for health care.ÌýÌýHealth Aff (Millwood). 2016;35(6):1084-1090. doi:
15.
Walkup ÌýJT, Townsend ÌýL, Crystal ÌýS, Olfson ÌýM. ÌýA systematic review of validated methods for identifying suicide or suicidal ideation using administrative or claims data.ÌýÌýPharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(suppl 1):174-182. doi:
16.
Wang ÌýY, Kung ÌýLA, Byrd ÌýTA. ÌýBig data analytics: understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations.ÌýÌýTechnol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;126:3-13. doi:
17.
Pokorny ÌýAD. ÌýPrediction of suicide in psychiatric patients: report of a prospective study.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(3):249-257. doi:
18.
MacKinnon ÌýDR, Farberow ÌýNL. ÌýAn assessment of the utility of suicide prediction.ÌýÌýSuicide Life Threat Behav. 1976;6(2):86-91.
19.
Moher ÌýD, Liberati ÌýA, Tetzlaff ÌýJ, Altman ÌýDG; PRISMA Group. ÌýPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.ÌýÌýPLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:
20.
Predictive modeling algorithms to estimate suicide risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. PROSPERO. . Accessed February 7, 2019.
21.
Ban ÌýJW, Emparanza ÌýJI, Urreta ÌýI, Burls ÌýA. ÌýDesign characteristics influence performance of clinical prediction rules in validation: a meta-epidemiological study.ÌýÌýPLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145779. doi:
22.
Whiting ÌýPF, Rutjes ÌýAW, Westwood ÌýME, Ìýet al; QUADAS-2 Group. ÌýQUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.ÌýÌýAnn Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529-536. doi:
23.
Streiner ÌýDL. ÌýDiagnosing tests: using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests.ÌýÌýJ Pers Assess. 2003;81(3):209-219. doi:
24.
Choi ÌýSB, Lee ÌýW, Yoon ÌýJH, Won ÌýJU, Kim ÌýDW. ÌýTen-year prediction of suicide death using Cox regression and machine learning in a nationwide retrospective cohort study in South Korea.ÌýÌýJ Affect Disord. 2018;231:8-14. doi:
25.
Kessler ÌýRC, Hwang ÌýI, Hoffmire ÌýCA, Ìýet al. ÌýDeveloping a practical suicide risk prediction model for targeting high-risk patients in the Veterans Health Administration.ÌýÌýInt J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017;26(3):e1575. doi:
26.
McCarthy ÌýJF, Bossarte ÌýRM, Katz ÌýIR, Ìýet alÌýPredictive modeling and concentration of the risk of suicide: implications for preventive interventions in the US Department of Veterans Affairs.ÌýÌýAm J Public Health. 2015;105(9):1935-1942. doi:
27.
Simon ÌýGE, Johnson ÌýE, Lawrence ÌýJM, Ìýet al. ÌýPredicting suicide attempts and suicide deaths following outpatient visits using electronic health records.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2018;175(10):951-960. doi:
28.
Kessler ÌýRC, Warner ÌýCH, Ivany ÌýC, Ìýet al; Army STARRS Collaborators. ÌýPredicting suicides after psychiatric hospitalization in US Army soldiers: the Army Study To Assess Risk and rEsilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).ÌýÌýJAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(1):49-57. doi:
29.
Kessler ÌýRC, Stein ÌýMB, Petukhova ÌýMV, Ìýet al; Army STARRS Collaborators. ÌýPredicting suicides after outpatient mental health visits in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).ÌýÌýMol Psychiatry. 2017;22(4):544-551. doi:
30.
Amini ÌýP, Ahmadinia ÌýH, Poorolajal ÌýJ, Moqaddasi Amiri ÌýM. ÌýEvaluating the high risk groups for suicide: a comparison of logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree and artificial neural network.ÌýÌýIran J Public Health. 2016;45(9):1179-1187.
31.
Barak-Corren ÌýY, Castro ÌýVM, Javitt ÌýS, Ìýet al. ÌýPredicting suicidal behavior from longitudinal electronic health records.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2017;174(2):154-162. doi:
32.
DelPozo-Banos ÌýM, John ÌýA, Petkov ÌýN, Ìýet al. ÌýUsing neural networks with routine health records to identify suicide risk: feasibility study.ÌýÌýJMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(2):e10144. doi:
33.
Karmakar ÌýC, Luo ÌýW, Tran ÌýT, Berk ÌýM, Venkatesh ÌýS. ÌýPredicting risk of suicide attempt using history of physical illnesses from electronic medical records.ÌýÌýJMIR Ment Health. 2016;3(3):e19. doi:
34.
Nock ÌýMK, Millner ÌýAJ, Joiner ÌýTE, Ìýet al. ÌýRisk factors for the transition from suicide ideation to suicide attempt: Results from the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS).ÌýÌýJ Abnorm Psychol. 2018;127(2):139-149. doi:
35.
Tran ÌýT, Luo ÌýW, Phung ÌýD, Ìýet al. ÌýRisk stratification using data from electronic medical records better predicts suicide risks than clinician assessments.ÌýÌýBMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:76-84. doi:
36.
Walsh ÌýCG, Ribeiro ÌýJD, Franklin ÌýJC. ÌýPredicting risk of suicide attempts over time through machine learning.ÌýÌýClin Psychol Sci. 2017;5(3):457-469. doi:
37.
Galfalvy ÌýHC, Oquendo ÌýMA, Mann ÌýJJ. ÌýEvaluation of clinical prognostic models for suicide attempts after a major depressive episode.ÌýÌýActa Psychiatr Scand. 2008;117(4):244-252. doi:
38.
Hartl ÌýTL, Rosen ÌýC, Drescher ÌýK, Lee ÌýTT, Gusman ÌýF. ÌýPredicting high-risk behaviors in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.ÌýÌýJ Nerv Ment Dis. 2005;193(7):464-472. doi:
39.
Ilgen ÌýMA, Downing ÌýK, Zivin ÌýK, Ìýet al. ÌýExploratory data mining analysis identifying subgroups of patients with depression who are at high risk for suicide.ÌýÌýJ Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70(11):1495-1500. doi:
40.
Motto ÌýJA, Bostrom ÌýAG. ÌýModels of suicide risk: nice persons.ÌýÌý°ä°ù¾±²õ¾±²õ. 1990;11(2):37-47.
41.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Welcome to WISQARS. . Accessed February 6, 2019.
42.
Grimes ÌýDA, Schulz ÌýKF. ÌýUses and abuses of screening tests.ÌýÌý³¢²¹²Ô³¦±ð³Ù. 2002;359(9309):881-884. doi:
43.
Mulder ÌýR, Newton-Howes ÌýG, Coid ÌýJW. ÌýThe futility of risk prediction in psychiatry.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 2016;209(4):271-272. doi:
44.
Nelson ÌýHD, Denneson ÌýLM, Low ÌýAR, Ìýet al. ÌýSuicide risk assessment and prevention: a systematic review focusing on veterans.ÌýÌýPsychiatr Serv. 2017;68(10):1003-1015. doi:
45.
Mustafa ÌýRA, Wiercioch ÌýW, Cheung ÌýA, Ìýet al. ÌýDecision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies: paper 2: a review of methodological and practical challenges.ÌýÌýJ Clin Epidemiol. 2017;92:18-28. doi:
46.
Donald Draughon v United State of America, et al. Case No. 14-2264-JAR-GLR. United States District Court, D. Kansas.
47.
ÌýJoint Action Plan for Supporting Veterans During Their Transition From Uniformed Service to Civilian Life. Washington, DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs; 2018.
48.
VA REACH VET initiative helps save veterans lives: program signals when more help is needed for at-risk veterans [press release]. Washington DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs; April 3, 2017.
49.
Tucker ÌýRP, Tackett ÌýMJ, Glickman ÌýD, Reger ÌýMA. ÌýEthical and practical considerations in the use of a predictive model to trigger suicide prevention interventions in healthcare settingsÌý [published online January 18, 2018]. ÌýSuicide Life Threat Behav. doi:
Views 16,111
Review
March 13, 2019

Prediction Models for Suicide Attempts and Deaths: A Systematic Review and Simulation

Author Affiliations
  • 1Psychological Health Center of Excellence, Defense Health Agency, Silver Spring, Maryland
  • 2Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
  • 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(6):642-651. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0174
Key Points

QuestionÌý Have advances in statistical modeling improved the predictive validity of suicide prediction algorithms sufficiently to render their predictions actionable?

FindingsÌý In this systematic review of 17 studies including 64 unique suicide prediction models, the models had good overall classification and low positive predictive values. Use of these models would result in high false-positive rates and considerable false-negative rates if implemented in isolation.

MeaningÌý At present, the performance of suicide prediction models suggests that they offer limited practical utility in predicting suicide mortality.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý Suicide prediction models have the potential to improve the identification of patients at heightened suicide risk by using predictive algorithms on large-scale data sources. Suicide prediction models are being developed for use across enterprise-level health care systems including the US Department of Defense, US Department of Veterans Affairs, and Kaiser Permanente.

ObjectivesÌý To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of suicide prediction models in predicting suicide and suicide attempts and to simulate the effects of implementing suicide prediction models using population-level estimates of suicide rates.

Evidence ReviewÌý A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify research evaluating the predictive accuracy of suicide prediction models in identifying patients at high risk for a suicide attempt or death by suicide. Each database was searched from inception to August 21, 2018. The search strategy included search terms for suicidal behavior, risk prediction, and predictive modeling. Reference lists of included studies were also screened. Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated eligible studies.

FindingsÌý From a total of 7306 abstracts reviewed, 17 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 64 unique prediction models across 5 countries with more than 14 million participants. The research quality of the included studies was generally high. Global classification accuracy was good (≥0.80 in most models), while the predictive validity associated with a positive result for suicide mortality was extremely low (≤0.01 in most models). Simulations of the results suggest very low positive predictive values across a variety of population assessment characteristics.

Conclusions and RelevanceÌý To date, suicide prediction models produce accurate overall classification models, but their accuracy of predicting a future event is near 0. Several critical concerns remain unaddressed, precluding their readiness for clinical applications across health systems.

×