ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Health Technology Assessment in the US—A Word of Caution—Reply | JAMA Internal Medicine | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Comment & Response
May 20, 2024

Health Technology Assessment in the US—A Word of Caution—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(7):851. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1461

In Reply In their Letter to the Editor, Olivença and colleagues question the benefit of adopting health technology assessment (HTA) in the US, and suggest it could result in fewer drugs being available to patients. They raise 3 main critiques of our study.1

First, Olivença et al note that patients in countries with HTA have voiced concerns about inadequate access to new therapies, citing 5 media reports from negative coverage decisions in England. The extent to which these reports represent the broader views of society is unclear. Recent decades have seen global consensus that universal health coverage is desirable for health care systems. Achieving universal coverage requires decisions about which services should be made available to maximize population health. As many new drugs offer little or no added therapeutic value,2 no coverage may be acceptable unless pharmaceutical companies offer reasonable prices (otherwise, funds would not be available to pay for other health services). In our study, we observed good coverage in all countries of high-value drugs following HTA review.

×