vlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Views 3,097
Review
January 25, 2023

Values and Preferences of Patients and Caregivers Regarding Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis (Eczema): A Systematic Review

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • 2Department of Medicine, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • 4Department of Preventive Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 5Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • 6Allergy & Asthma Network, Vienna, Virginia
  • 7Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville
  • 8Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York
  • 9Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Pediatrics–Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
  • 10Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
  • 11Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
  • 12Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 13University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester
  • 14Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • 15School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe
  • 16Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 17Toronto, Ontario
  • 18Orthopedic Neurological Rehabilitation, Northridge, California
  • 19University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
  • 20Department of Family Medicine, UPMC St Margaret, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
  • 21Westerville, Ohio
  • 22Global Parents for Eczema Research, California
  • 23Department of Dermatology; University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
  • 24National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
  • 25National Eczema Association, Novato, California
  • 26Origins Dermatology Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • 27The Research Institute of St Joe's Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
JAMA Dermatol. 2023;159(3):320-330. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.6045
Key Points

Question What do patients and caregivers value when choosing treatments for atopic dermatitis?

Findings In this systematic synthesis of 62 studies including 19 442 participants, patients and caregivers preferred avoiding adverse effects and valued treatment approaches that relieve itching and burning, are minimally disruptive to daily activities, have limited visibility, and sparingly use topical corticosteroids. Some studies presented varied perspectives, and 18 were at high risk for industry sponsorship bias.

Meaning In the first systematic review to address patient values and preferences in the management of atopic dermatitis to our knowledge, 6 key themes that may inform optimal clinical care, practice guidelines, and future research have been identified.

Abstract

Importance Patient values and preferences can inform atopic dermatitis (AD) care. Systematic summaries of evidence addressing patient values and preferences have not previously been available.

Objective To inform American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI)/American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guideline development, patient and caregiver values and preferences in the management of AD were systematically synthesized.

Evidence Review Paired reviewers independently screened MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases from inception until March 20, 2022, for studies of patients with AD or their caregivers, eliciting values and preferences about treatment, rated risk of bias, and extracted data. Thematic and inductive content analysis to qualitatively synthesize the findings was used. Patients, caregivers, and clinical experts provided triangulation. The GRADE-CERQual (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation–Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research) informed rating of the quality of evidence.

Findings A total of 7780 studies were identified, of which 62 proved eligible (n = 19 442; median age across studies [range], 15 years [3-44]; 59% female participants). High certainty evidence showed that patients and caregivers preferred to start with nonmedical treatments and to step up therapy with increasing AD severity. Moderate certainty evidence showed that adverse effects from treatment were a substantial concern. Low certainty evidence showed that patients and caregivers preferred odorless treatments that are not visible and have a minimal effect on daily life. Patients valued treatments capable of relieving itching and burning skin and preferred to apply topical corticosteroids sparingly. Patients valued a strong patient-clinician relationship. Some studies presented varied perspectives and 18 were at high risk for industry sponsorship bias.

Conclusions and Relevance In the first systematic review to address patient values and preferences in management of AD to our knowledge, 6 key themes that may inform optimal clinical care, practice guidelines, and future research have been identified.

Add or change institution
×