ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

TRIPOD Reporting Guidelines for Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies | Research, Methods, Statistics | JAMA Surgery | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Bilimoria  KY, Liu  Y, Paruch  JL,  et al.  Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons.   J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833-42.e1, 3. doi:
2.
Loupy  A, Aubert  O, Orandi  BJ,  et al.  Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study.  Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2019;366:l4923. doi:
3.
Battersby  NJ, Bouliotis  G, Emmertsen  KJ,  et al; UK and Danish LARS Study Groups.  Development and external validation of a nomogram and online tool to predict bowel dysfunction following restorative rectal cancer resection: the POLARS score.  Ìý³Ò³Ü³Ù. 2018;67(4):688-696. doi:
4.
Xu  D, Zhang  K, Li  M,  et al.  Prognostic nomogram for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a TRIPOD-Compliant Retrospective Long-Term Survival Analysis.   World J Surg. 2020;44(4):1260-1269. doi:
5.
Heus  P, Damen  JAAG, Pajouheshnia  R,  et al.  Poor reporting of multivariable prediction model studies: towards a targeted implementation strategy of the TRIPOD statement.   BMC Med. 2018;16(1):120. doi:
6.
Collins  GS, Reitsma  JB, Altman  DG, Moons  KG.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.  Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2015;350:g7594. doi:
7.
Wolff  RF, Moons  KGM, Riley  RD,  et al; PROBAST Group†.  PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies.   Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(1):51-58. doi:
8.
Kappen  TH, van Klei  WA, van Wolfswinkel  L, Kalkman  CJ, Vergouwe  Y, Moons  KGM.  Evaluating the impact of prediction models: lessons learned, challenges, and recommendations.   Diagn Progn Res. 2018;2:11. Published online May 17, 2019. doi:
Views 2,672
Guide to Statistics and Methods
Reporting Guidelines
April 7, 2021

TRIPOD Reporting Guidelines for Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies

Author Affiliations
  • 1Emory Health Services Research Center, Department of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 2Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 3Department of Emergency Medicine at Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine
  • 4Statistical Editor, JAMA Surgery
  • 5Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, California
JAMA Surg. 2021;156(7):675-676. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0537

Two distinct types of statistical models are used in medical research. Etiologic models examine a potential causal association between an exposure and an outcome (typically while controlling for confounding variables). Predictive models aim to predict the individual risk of an outcome using multiple covariates that may or may not have a causal association. Both models are useful in surgery, where individualized risks can be used to inform surgeons, patients, and their families about risks of perioperative outcomes. For example, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator is a widely adopted, web-based decision aid that uses estimates from a risk prediction model to inform surgeons and patients about the estimated risk of 30-day postoperative complications.1 However, not all models follow high standards before dissemination in peer-reviewed publications or incorporation into decision aids.

×