ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Original Investigation
August 14, 2024

Insurance-Related Disparities in Withdrawal of Life Support and Mortality After Spinal Cord Injury

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 4Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • 5Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • 6Department of Anesthesia, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 7Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 8Division of Trauma Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto
JAMA Surg. 2024;159(10):1196-1204. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2967
Key Points

QuestionÌý Is insurance payer status associated with a significant difference in the likelihood of withdrawal of life-supporting treatment and mortality in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury?

FindingsÌý In this cohort study of 8421 adults with complete cervical spinal cord injury, uninsured patients had greater odds of withdrawal of life-supporting treatment and mortality and publicly insured patients had longer stay and greater odds of hospital complications when compared with privately insured patients.

MeaningÌý These findings highlight potential insurance-related disparities in outcomes after complete cervical spinal cord injury.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý Identifying disparities in health outcomes related to modifiable patient factors can improve patient care.

ObjectiveÌý To compare likelihood of withdrawal of life-supporting treatment (WLST) and mortality in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) with different types of insurance.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsÌý This retrospective cohort study collected data between 2013 and 2020 from 498 trauma centers participating in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Participants included adult patients (older than 16 years) with complete cervical SCI. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2023, through May 18, 2024.

ExposureÌý Uninsured or public insurance compared with private insurance.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý Coprimary outcomes were WLST and mortality. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of each outcome was estimated using hierarchical logistic regression. Propensity score matching was used as an alternative analysis to compare public and privately insured patients. Process of care outcomes, including the occurrence of a hospital complication and length of stay, were compared between matched patients.

ResultsÌý The study included 8421 patients with complete cervical SCI treated across 498 trauma centers (mean [SD] age, 49.1 [20.2] years; 6742 male [80.1%]). Among the 3524 patients with private insurance, 503 had WLST (14.3%) and 756 died (21.5%). Among the 3957 patients with public insurance, 906 had WLST (22.2%) and 1209 died (30.6%). Among the 940 uninsured patients, 156 had WLST (16.6%) and 318 died (33.8%). A significant difference was found between uninsured and privately insured patients in the adjusted odds of WLST (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11-2.01) and mortality (aOR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.50-2.60). Similar results were found in subgroup analyses. Matched public compared with private insurance patients were found to have significantly greater odds of hospital complications (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.42) and longer hospital stay (mean difference 5.90 days; 95% CI, 4.64-7.20), which was redemonstrated on subgroup analyses.

Conclusions and RelevanceÌý Health insurance type was associated with significant differences in the odds of WLST, mortality, hospital complications, and days in hospital among patients with complete cervical SCI in this study. Future work is needed to incorporate patient perspectives and identify strategies to close the quality gap for the large number of patients without private insurance.

Add or change institution
×