vlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Original Investigation
July 17, 2024

Pregnancy and Parenthood Among US Surgical Residents

Author Affiliations
  • 1Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
  • 2Northwestern Quality Improvement, Research, and Education in Surgery (NQUIRES), Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
  • 3Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 4Department of General Surgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
  • 5Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 6Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 7Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
  • 8American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • 9American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
  • 10Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois
  • 11Division of Pediatric Surgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
  • 12Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
JAMA Surg. 2024;159(10):1127-1137. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2399
Key Points

Question How do surgical residents experience pregnancy and parenthood?

Findings In this cohort study involving a survey of 5692 US surgical residents, 957 reported pregnancies during training. Female residents more often experienced pregnancy/parenthood-based mistreatment than male residents and were more likely to experience obstetric complications and postpartum depression than partners of male residents; resident mistreatment and postpartum depression (whether experienced by female residents or partners of male residents) were associated with resident burnout and thoughts of attrition.

Meaning Disparities between male and female residents in the experiences of pregnancy/parenthood may drive gendered attrition; programmatic change is needed to protect maternal-fetal health and advance workforce gender equity.

Abstract

Importance The ability to pursue family planning goals is integral to gender equity in any field. Procedural specialties pose occupational risks to pregnancy. As the largest procedural specialty, general surgery provides an opportunity to understand family planning, workplace support for parenthood, obstetric outcomes, and the impact of these factors on workforce well-being, gender equity, and attrition.

Objective To examine pregnancy and parenthood experiences, including mistreatment and obstetric outcomes, among a cohort of US general surgical residents.

Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study involved a cross-sectional national survey of general surgery residents in all programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education after the 2021 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination. Female respondents who reported a pregnancy and male respondents whose partners were pregnant during clinical training were queried about pregnancy- and parenthood-based mistreatment, obstetric outcomes, and current well-being (burnout, thoughts of attrition, suicidality).

Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes included obstetric complications and postpartum depression compared between female residents and partners of male residents. Secondary outcomes included perceptions about support for family planning, pregnancy, or parenthood; assisted reproductive technology use; pregnancy/parenthood-based mistreatment; neonatal complications; and well-being, compared between female and male residents.

Results A total of 5692 residents from 325 US general surgery programs participated (81.2% response rate). Among them, 957 residents (16.8%) reported a pregnancy during clinical training (692/3097 [22.3%] male vs 265/2595 [10.2%] female; P < .001). Compared with male residents, female residents more frequently delayed having children because of training (1201/2568 [46.8%] females vs 1006/3072 [32.7%] males; P < .001) and experienced pregnancy/parenthood-based mistreatment (132 [58.1%] females vs 179 [30.5%] males; P < .001). Compared with partners of male residents, female residents were more likely to experience obstetric complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.96) and postpartum depression (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.11-2.40). Pregnancy/parenthood-based mistreatment was associated with increased burnout (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.48-2.78) and thoughts of attrition (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.61-3.88). Postpartum depression, whether in female residents or partners of male residents, was associated with resident burnout (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.27-2.92), thoughts of attrition (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.36-3.96), and suicidality (OR, 5.58; 95% CI, 2.59-11.99).

Conclusions and Relevance This study found that pregnancy/parenthood-based mistreatment, obstetric complications, and postpartum depression were associated with female gender, likely driving gendered attrition. Systematic change is needed to protect maternal-fetal health and advance gender equity in procedural fields.

Add or change institution
2 Comments for this article
EXPAND ALL
Pregnancy and parenthood among surgical residents;
Els Nieveen van Dijkum, MD, PhD, Full Professor | Department Of Surgery, Surgical Residency Training program Director, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Comment also from
Dr Abbey Schepers, Surgeon, LUMC, Leiden
Drs Maud Klaassen, PhD student
Drs. Esther Jacobs, Educator Residency Training Program

With great interest, we have read this manuscript and are pleased that JAMA Surgery supports this study. It is important to show the effects of working environments on individuals, especially young professionals who are not always powerful empowered enough to initiate change.

The manuscript describes the struggles of talented young people who work hard to achieve their goals yet receive so little support in times when it is most important to
them. By providing comprehensive data on the high rates of pregnancy complications and the increased use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among female surgeons, the study highlights the urgent need for structural changes in the medical profession.

The current Dutch healthcare system protects pregnant doctors with a 16-week maternity leave (4-6 weeks before and 10-12 weeks after delivery) and no on-call shifts after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Fathers or partners can be fully paid off for five weeks after delivery, and both parents can have unpaid care days when care is needed.

Although this Dutch protection of mothers and support for partners seems royal and much better than the described US system, still significant complications in pregnancy and parenthood are seen in residents. In the Netherlands, we are currently investigating the outcomes of pregnancy among in our residents and surgeons. We anticipate comparable results as in the US.

While the discussion in the manuscript carefully considers various factors contributing to these complications, one critical aspect remains unaddressed: the behavior of colleagues. Surgeons themselves, the other residents, the directors of the residency training programmes, the nurses, and colleagues in the operating rooms have a great role in lowering the burden for pregnant women to take extra rest during the day, to facilitate sitting during work, or to create the opportunity to leave early after a busy day. The same goes for young parents when extra care for a newborn is needed or during lactation.

The current behavior of our colleagues is described in the manuscript, with remarks concerning planning, stepping down from functions and positions, and adding to gender disparities. Changing the behavior of all working-staff in hospitals is challenging but essential. This aspect could have been added to the conclusion of this manuscript. Being kind is without cost.

Why not start today with being kind to all our colleagues, not judging them, not thinking for them, but asking them if they are OK. To make sure they feel safe and supported. Not only will our pregnant colleagues thrive, but all our colleagues will probably feel more accepted and safer in their jobs.

Knowing that happy workers are better workers, it should be emphasized that especially during pregnancy and parenthood, a little understanding and support will possibly help young residents become good surgeons and good parents at the same time. This dual achievement should be our goal.

In conclusion, we commend the study for bringing attention to the significant challenges faced by female surgeons. To foster a truly supportive environment, it is imperative to address the behavioral changes needed among colleagues and within the hospital culture. By doing this, we can make sure that all surgeons, especially those who are pregnant or new parents, feel appreciated and supported, and are able to thrive both personally and professionally.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
In reply to van Dijkum, et al.
Erika Rangel, MD | Massachusetts General Hospital
We thank van Dijkum et al. for their thoughtful response to our article on pregnancy complications and parenthood experiences among surgical residents. We appreciate their comparison with the Dutch healthcare system, which highlights the broader context in which these issues unfold.

Indeed, the Dutch system offers more extensive support for pregnant residents and new parents, including longer maternity leave and no on-call shifts after 20 weeks of pregnancy. However, as both our study and the Dutch experience demonstrate, structural protections alone do not eliminate the challenges faced by pregnant and parenting surgeons. A significant factor that contributes to these
difficulties is the deeply ingrained surgical culture.

We wholeheartedly agree that the culture within our profession must evolve. The current norms and expectations, shaped by earlier generations of surgeons, are often at odds with the more egalitarian approach to parenthood embraced by many millennial residents. This clash leads to increased work-home conflict, contributing to both professional dissatisfaction and personal strain.

Dijkum et al. noted, "being kind is without cost." While we share the sentiment that kindness should be a fundamental part of our professional interactions, we believe it is important to recognize that kindness often requires tangible investments. Supporting a colleague who needs time off to take their child to the pediatrician or covering extra shifts for someone caring for a sick baby means redistributing workload and, at times, incurring additional expenses. That coverage should be appropriately remunerated, and these are real costs that our institutions must be willing to bear.

Nevertheless, these investments are crucial. By creating an environment that truly supports our trainees, we build a foundation for a sustainable workforce. The effort we put in now will pay dividends in the form of career longevity, job satisfaction, and the well-being of future generations of surgeons. This "pay it forward" model ensures that we not only retain talented individuals in the field but also foster a culture where all members can thrive both personally and professionally.

In conclusion, we echo the call for a kinder, more supportive culture in surgery, but we also emphasize that such a culture requires deliberate, ongoing investment. It is the right thing to do, not just for the well-being of our colleagues, but for the future of our profession.

Authors:
Ruojia Debbie Li, Yue-Yung Hu, Erika L. Rangel
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
×