ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Making the Opioid Public Health Emergency Effective | Substance Use and Addiction Medicine | JAMA Psychiatry | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Views 2,456
Viewpoint
´¡³Ü²µ³Ü²õ³ÙÌý2018

Making the Opioid Public Health Emergency Effective

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
  • 2Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(8):767-768. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0611

The United States faces a daunting opioid epidemic that the Trump administration declared a public health emergency (PHE) on October 26, 2017, now extended through April 24, 2018. There is some justification for declaring a PHE, or an urgent situation requiring immediate action to avoid serious harm.1 Nevertheless, the federal government appears to be largely conducting business as usual, neglecting to implement emergency actions to supplement the 21st Century Cures Act and the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act, both enacted in 2016, which have longer-term goals. A recent Congressional infusion of $6 billion across 2 years can begin to triage opioid emergencies if the funds are allocated toward these purposes. However, the epidemic, whose burden cost the United States $115 billion in 2017 and is projected to cost $200 billion by 2020, requires much greater funds, quickly.2 The failure to act urgently threatens to delegitimize PHE powers1 and foregoes the opportunity to address acute opioid-induced harms.

×