BackgroundÌý
Neuroimaging studies suggest that schizophrenia is associated with gray and possibly white matter changes. It is unclear whether these changes are present at illness onset or which brain structures are selectively affected. New imaging methods such as magnetization transfer imaging may be more sensitive than conventional volumetric imaging to the subtle structural brain changes in schizophrenia.
MethodsÌý
High-resolution volumetric T1-weighted images and magnetization transfer images were acquired from 30 patients (29 with first-episode schizophrenia and 1 with schizophreniform psychoses) and 30 control subjects. Images were processed using voxel-based morphometry, which allows whole-brain analysis.
ResultsÌý
Compared with controls, the magnetization transfer ratio (an index of signal loss derived from magnetization transfer imaging) was reduced bilaterally in the medial prefrontal cortex (right greater than left), insula (left greater than right), and white matter incorporating the fasciculus uncinatus (left greater than right) in the patient group. Analysis of the T1-weighted images did not reveal significant volumetric differences between patients and controls.
ConclusionsÌý
Gray and white matter abnormalities are present in schizophrenia at illness onset. The magnetization transfer ratio is sensitive to these abnormalities, which cannot be explained by detectable atrophy in our patient group.
A RECENT REVIEW1 concluded that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain abnormalities are common in schizophrenia populations. Frequencies of regional changes, expressed as a percentage of studies reviewed, were 100% for volume loss in the superior temporal gyrus, 74% for medial temporal structures, 59% for prefrontal regions, 31% for the cerebellum, and 80% for ventricular enlargement.1 A contemporary meta-analysis2 also reported increased ventricular volume and decreases in medial temporal lobe structures and cerebral volume. Converging evidence from neuroimaging, neuropathological, and neurocognitive studies suggests that abnormalities in frontotemporal, frontostriatal,3-7 and frontothalamic-cerebellar8 pathways may explain many of the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia. It remains uncertain whether structural changes are reversible9 or progressive, at least in some patients,10 and whether different clinical and cognitive phenotypes are associated with distinctive brain abnormalities.
Recently, attention has focused on first-episode schizophrenia, in which detectable brain abnormalities are more likely to reflect the primary disease process, diminishing confounds such as medication exposure and chronicity. In their review, Shenton et al1 concluded that abnormalities described in patients with first-episode schizophrenia were similar to those in chronic schizophrenia populations. Reduced gray matter volume,11,12 increased ventricular volumes,13,14 and temporolimbic abnormalities15,16 are the most commonly reported abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia. Hippocampus volume reduction has been considered one of the most consistent structural abnormalities in schizophrenia, and it may be present at illness onset.17 Perhaps because early structural changes may be subtle and patients with first-episode schizophrenia are more likely to have variable disease outcomes, some such studies have not found significant volumetric abnormalities for ventricles and temporal lobes,18 regional or total hemisphere volumes,19 and the hippocampus or parahippocampal gyrus.20,21 Although high-resolution imaging continues to improve sensitivity with progressively decreasing slice thickness, the limitations of volumetric MRI include lack of neuropathological specificity and poor sensitivity to subtle neuropathological changes that may not culminate in atrophy. In schizophrenia neuroimaging, the enhanced sensitivity and neuropathological specificity of magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) offers considerable advantages.
First described by Wolff and Balaban,22 MTI is based on the interaction of protons bound to macromolecular structures and free protons in tissue water. In brain tissue, the major macromolecules in the bound proton pool are thought to be cell membrane proteins and phospholipids in gray matter and myelin in white matter. Bound protons are preferentially saturated using an off-resonance radiofrequency pulse. Chemical exchange or direct dipolar coupling transfers macromolecular saturation from bound to free protons, causing decreased longitudinal magnetization undetected by conventional MRI because bound protons have short relaxation times in biological tissues. The reduction in signal intensity depends on macromolecular density. The nature of the interaction sites has yet to be fully determined.23 However, creatine-containing compounds seem to be involved in through-space dipolar interactions to a greater extent than glutamine/glutamate, N-acetylaspartate, and lactate, whereas chemical interaction may be more important for the latter.24 The degree of signal loss, measured in percentage units, is the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR).
An MTR reduction correlates with myelin and axonal loss in postmortem tissue from the spinal cord25 and brain26 in multiple sclerosis, experimental allergic encephalitis,27 toxic demyelination,28 wallerian degeneration,29 and experimental brain injury.30 In vivo white matter MTR decreases occur in conditions with myelin or axonal loss, for example, multiple sclerosis,31 central pontine myelinolysis,32 cerebral ischemia,33 systemic lupus,34 human immunodeficiency virus infection,35 and traumatic brain injury.36 Gray matter abnormalities have been studied less extensively, but wallerian degeneration triggered by distant axonal damage and microscopic lesions are thought to explain cortical MTR reductions in multiple sclerosis.37 The first study to use MTI in chronic schizophrenia38 reported widespread cortical MTR reductions indicative of subtle structural abnormalities, which may reflect reported changes in dendritic density.39
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first application of MTI to the investigation of patients with first-episode schizophrenia, whom we compared with healthy volunteers using the MTR, an index of signal loss derived from MTIs. We also acquired high-resolution volumetric images to assess for atrophy. Voxel-based morphometric (VBM) analysis was used to study group differences using both types of imaging because VBM reduces observer bias and allows whole-brain analysis. Our hypothesis was that frontotemporal abnormalities would be detectable by the time patients first present to medical attention. Based on findings in chronic schizophrenia,38 we further predicted that the MTR would be more sensitive to these abnormalities than conventional T1-weighted volumetric imaging.
Thirty patients (19 were men and 3 were left-handed) with a mean age of 27.3 years (range, 18-47 years) were examined. The catchment area included deprived inner city and affluent suburban areas of London. Patients were recruited as soon as possible after first presenting to mental health services with schizophreniform psychosis (DSM-IV). Diagnostic criteria were reviewed by 2 experienced clinicians (E.M.J.) 1 year after recruitment to establish a diagnosis of schizophrenia. One patient was lost to follow-up before this diagnostic review. Antipsychotic medications included olanzapine, risperidone, sulpiride, haloperidol, and zuclopenthixol (19 patients used atypical agents, 6 used typical agents, and 5 were unmedicated). Symptom severity was assessed using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms,40 and the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale.41 We also determined handedness42 and parental social class43 and estimated premorbid IQ using the National Adult Reading Test.44Table 1 summarizes demographic and clinical indices.
Thirty healthy volunteers (18 were men and 2 were left-handed) with a mean age of 28.9 years (range, 21-49 years) were recruited to match the patient group for age, sex, handedness, and estimated premorbid IQ. Controls with a history of neurological or systemic illness, head injury, substance abuse, or alcohol intake greater than 240 g/wk were excluded. Controls with a personal or family history of psychiatric illness were also excluded. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from all relevant research ethics committees. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. A neuroradiologist reviewed the brain MRIs. No gross abnormalities were reported.
Magnetic resonance imaging
Participants underwent MRI using a 1.5-tesla scanner (Signa; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis) with a standard quadrature head coil. Total scanning time (including sequences not reported herein) was 60 minutes. A preliminary sagittal localizing scan was acquired. High-resolution coronal volumetric images were acquired using a 3-dimensional T1-weighted spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) sequence generating 124 contiguous, 1.5-mm coronal slices (echo time, 4.2 milliseconds; repetition time, 15 milliseconds; field of view, 24 cm2; 256 × 192 matrix; and flip angle, 20°). The 1.0 × 1.2 × 1.5-mm acquisition parameters were determined by scan time constraints and were automatically reconstructed by the scanner to a 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.5-mm voxel size. Axial MTIs were acquired using a dual spin-echo–based MTI sequence (echo time, 30/80 milliseconds; repetition time, 1720 milliseconds; 28 contiguous 5-mm axial slices; 256 × 128 pixel image matrix; and field of view, 24 cm2) with and without a saturation pulse (16 milliseconds, 23.2-µT Hamming appodised 3 lobe sinc pulse applied 1 kHz from water resonance). The 1 × 2 × 5-mm MTI acquisition parameters were determined by scan time constraints. The scanner automatically reconstructed images to a 1 × 1 × 5-mm voxel size. The MTI sequence described in detail by Barker et al45 generates proton-density and T2-weighted images along with MT-weighted images. These images are all inherently registered to each other and to the calculated MTR image created from proton-density and MT-weighted images. The MTR is an index of signal loss in percentage units, calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis from the following formula:
MTR = [(Mo − Ms)/Mo] × 100,
where Ms and Mo are mean signal intensities with and without the saturation pulse, respectively. The MTR is not calculated in voxels if values in source images are below the mean background noise level. We used the 30-millisecond echo for MTR calculation because the resulting map has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than that from the 80-millisecond echo. Typical MTR values are 30% to 50% for white matter, 20% to 40% for gray matter, and approaching 0% for cerebrospinal fluid. For our sequence, MTR values were approximately 40% for white matter, 35% for subcortical gray matter, 32% for cortical gray matter, and 2% for cerebrospinal fluid.
Data were processed on a computer workstation (Sun Ultra; Sun Microsystems Inc, Santa Clara, Calif) using SPM99 statistical parametric mapping software (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London) and working in an analysis environment (MATLAB; The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Mass), unless otherwise stated.
Spoiled gradient recalled echo
Images were reoriented into axial slices aligned parallel to the anteroposterior commissural axis. The origin was set to the anterior commissure. Images were spatially normalized to the standard T1 template in SPM99, following a method that optimizes segmentation accuracy for VBM described by Good et al.46 Affine registration (12 nonlinear iterations, medium nonlinear regularization, resliced to 2 × 2 × 2-mm voxels) produced isotropic voxels of higher signal-to-noise ratio than the original images. The images were flipped to neurological space and then segmented using image intensity nonuniformity correction. A mixture model cluster analysis identifies voxel intensities matching tissue types (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) combined with a priori knowledge of the spatial distribution of these tissues derived from probability maps.47 Gray and white matter segments were extracted to remove nonbrain voxels and then underwent nonlinear normalization to the gray-and-white image template in SPM99 using 7 × 8 × 7 basis functions, 12 nonlinear iterations, and medium nonlinear regularization. The resulting images were segmented, producing gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid tissue maps in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space having excluded nonbrain voxels. Optimized methods, as described by Good et al,46 were used to incorporate information from the deformation fields using a modulation step to preserve within-voxel volumes that may have been altered during nonlinear normalization. Voxel values in segmented images were multiplied by Jacobian determinants, derived from spatial normalization, to provide intensity correction for the induced regional volumetric changes. Analysis of modulated data tests for regional differences in absolute tissue volume. Unmodulated data analysis is a complementary test for regional differences in tissue concentration per unit volume based on differences in image intensity.46-48
Magnetization transfer ratio
Axial images were acquired parallel to the anteroposterior commissural axis. Spatial normalization involved registration of the T2-weighted images, which are implicitly registered (from acquisition) to the MTR images, into standard space. This inherent coregistration of an MTR image and a T2-weighted image allows us to apply registration parameters determined from T2-weighted images (whose contrast matches the MNI template) to MTR images (for which no template is available). The registration used a modified algorithm for 3-dimensional alignment of positron emission tomographic images, relying on anatomic information to align 2 images by calculating the least squares difference of the 2 images on a voxel-by-voxel basis and iteratively moving the images relative to one another to minimize this cost function.49,50 The T2-weighted images were registered to the MNI T2-weighted average brain in SPM99 using affine 12-parameter, 3-dimensional linear transformations through a 2-stage process. For each participant, a transformation was first found between the T2-weighted image and the MNI T2-weighted average brain, retaining all tissue within the image (brain parenchyma, skull, scalp muscle and fat, and other extracranial tissue). Although reasonably robust, the registration is potentially susceptible to motion artifacts of brain relative to surrounding tissue. To overcome this, the inverse of the transformation found was applied to a version of the MNI T2-weighted average brain from which the skull had been removed. This transformed the skull-stripped MNI template to the native image space of the particular participant, allowing it to be used as a mask to remove nonbrain tissue from the individual participant's T2-weighted image. Each skull-stripped T2-weighted image thus created was then registered to the skull-stripped T2-weighted MNI atlas, transforming it into MNI space. As mask and T2-weighted images have now been skull stripped, this second registration is much more robust. This final transformation was then applied to the participant's MTR image, mapping it into MNI space. Nonbrain features were removed by masking with the skull-stripped T2-weighted MNI average brain. Thus, MTR images were normalized to MNI space but were not subjected to warping or segmentation. Resolution of voxel size of 1 × 1 × 5 mm was maintained for MTR images because, unlike SPGR data, resampling 1 × 1 × 5-mm MTR images to a 2 × 2 × 2-mm isotropic voxel size would have produced only a small increase in signal-to-noise ratio. To determine whether MTR changes were in gray or white matter, we overlaid MTR decreases in patients onto thresholded a priori gray and white matter probability maps provided with SPM99 using the "write filtered" function. A threshold of 16384 (50% of 32768, the intensity representing a probability of 1 in the images) on the white matter map was chosen to identify areas having a greater than 50% probability of being in white matter rather than gray matter.38
Taking account of voxel size and the size of structures within which abnormalities were predicted, images were smoothed to 15 mm (MTR) and 12 mm (SPGR) using a full-width–half-maximum Gaussian filter to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, allow for intersubject anatomical variability, and render the data more normally distributed by the central limit theorem. The probability distributions used in SPM99 for voxel and cluster analysis are approximations, which are valid within certain limits, especially with respect to smoothness and number of images. Low smoothing (full-width–half-maximum <3 times voxel size) with low df can cause aberrant voxel-level results. Consequently, smoothing of 3 times voxel size is recommended.51,52 Accordingly, we selected 15-mm full-width–half-maximum smoothing for MTR (3 times voxel size). This relatively high degree of smoothing also helped overcome problems due to the multislice nature of the MTR, which reduced the accuracy of data reconstruction in the slice direction during normalization. For SPGR data, we selected 12-mm full-width–half-maximum smoothing, the spatial scale at which the analysis is most sensitive to differences in regional gray matter. This spatial scale also allows comparison with previous SPM99 voxel-based studies in chronic schizophrenia.53-55 Each voxel in the smoothed data represents a locally weighted average intensity from a region of surrounding voxels defined by the size of the smoothing kernel.
Group comparisons for MTR (whole brain) and SPGR (both gray matter and white matter maps) between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and controls were performed based on the general linear model and the theory of Gaussian random fields56 using 2-sample t tests to compare populations with 1 scan per participant. Thresholds for MTR and SPGR data were set at 40% of mean image intensity to minimize low signal-to-noise voxels. Only voxels exceeding this intensity threshold(40% of mean image intensity) were included in the analyses. As calculation of mean intensity includes all the (very-low-intensity) pixels outside the head, the cutoff value of 40% of this value should not exclude any pixels that are fully brain tissue. This procedure excluded noise areas outside the brain or in the ventricles. Proportional scaling was used to normalize image intensity in SPGR gray and white matter maps. Using 2 contrasts, the analysis detected whether each voxel had a greater or lesser probability of change, that is, a reduction or increase in the parameter of interest in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with controls. The resulting set of voxel values for each contrast constitutes a statistical parametric map of the t statistic.
This study was a structural VBM analysis, and, consequently, we selected a study threshold of t>3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected). Statistical parametric mapping was originally designed to analyze functional data, and correction for multiple comparisons can be considered overly conservative when applied to structural data.57 We validated our analysis parameters by dividing the control subjects into 2 subgroups matched for age, handedness, and sex. At the threshold of t>3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected), there were no voxel-level differences in the MTR or SPGR (gray and white matter) between the 2 subgroups of controls, suggesting that this threshold minimizes false positives.
We also report cluster-level statistics for the MTR. Data histograms in a large single-slice region of interest (ROI) incorporating gray and white matter resembled a Gaussian distribution. This satisfies suggested criteria for using cluster size to assess significance in SPM99, considered appropriate only if data are normally distributed.47 This was not the case for SPGR segmented gray and white matter data. Consequently, we used only voxel-level thresholds for SPGR analysis.
There were no differences for age (t = 0.96; P = .34), sex (z = 0.81; P = .42), handedness (z = 0.46; P = .64), National Adult Reading Test premorbid IQ (t = 1.17; P = .27), or paternal social class (z = 0.86; P = .39) between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and controls using t tests for continuous variables and Mann-Whitney tests for categorical variables (Table 1).
Neither modulated (optimized) nor unmodulated (standard) SPGR T1-weighted gray matter and white matter maps revealed any significant differences between patients and controls for voxel-level statistics at a threshold of t = 3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected). Thus, regional atrophy was not detected because we did not demonstrate any significant regional differences in absolute tissue volume or tissue concentration per unit of volume of gray or white matter in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with matched controls.
At the study statistical threshold of t>3.24(P<.001, uncorrected), the MTR was reduced bilaterally in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with controls in the insula and adjacent white matter incorporating the fasciculus uncinatus, the right anteromedial frontal lobe extending into the anterior cingulate bilaterally, the right inferior and superior temporal gyrus, the left precuneus, and the left cerebellum (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3 and Table 2). Using the segmented white matter map, we ascertained that the MTR decreases were predominantly cortical, extending into white matter adjacent to the insula, encompassing the fasciculus uncinatus. To exclude the possibility that these were chance findings (type I error), a further analysis was undertaken correcting for multiple comparisons using Gaussian random fields (t>4.61; P<.05, corrected). Reductions in the MTR in the right medial prefrontal cortex, left insular cortex, and left fasciculus uncinatus survived this correction(Table 2). No MTR increases were observed in patients compared with controls at a threshold of t>3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected).
We conducted a post hoc validation study to confirm the SPM99 findings using ROI methods in native-space MTR images. Rectangular ROIs (37.9 mm2) were placed in the medial prefrontal cortex and insula using a standardized protocol in a sample of 8 male, right-handed patients with first-episode schizophrenia and age-, handedness-, and sex-matched controls using DispImage59 software. Axial proton-density slices were used to identify the lowest slice in which the head of the caudate was visible. Bilateral ROIs were placed in the medial prefrontal cortex, adjacent to the interhemispheric fissure, midway between the frontal pole and the anterior margin of the head of the caudate. Similarly, bilateral ROIs were also placed in the long gyrus of the insula in the adjacent slice. Proton-density images were coregistered to MTR images during acquisition, as previously described. The ROIs were automatically transferred to the coregistered MTR image using DispImage. Care was taken to avoid partial volume effects. The ROIs were placed masked to participant identity. Decreased MTRs were found using Mann-Whitney tests in the right prefrontal cortex and insula (bilaterally) that are consistent with the SPM99 analysis (Table 3).
The results of this study suggest that frontotemporal MTR abnormalities involving cortex and white matter are already present at the first episode of schizophrenia. The neuropathological basis for cortical MTR changes remains to be determined, but a variety of abnormalities could cause MTR reductions by decreasing the bound proton pool. Although creatine, choline, and N-acetylaspartate–related compounds are thought to contribute, the specific molecules responsible for the MTI signal in gray matter are yet to be specified. However, the MTI signal depends on macromolecular density, that is, mainly cell membrane proteins and phospholipids in gray matter and myelin in white matter. Reductions in the MTR in gray matter are likely to be related to decreased cell number, cell size, or dendritic density or may reflect abnormal cell membrane structure. White matter MTR reductions are likely to be related to abnormalities in myelin or reduced axonal density.
The anteromedial prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia has received little attention, although results of animal studies60 suggest that it may be relevant. Voxel-based studies in chronic schizophrenia have demonstrated anteromedial prefrontal cortex gray matter reductions in some55,61,62 but not all54 of a small number of studies. Region of interest studies have been complicated by methodological differences, with few studies evaluating frontal lobe subregions. In a study63 of patients with chronic schizophrenia and neocortex segmented into 48 topographic regions, the greatest volumetric reductions were in medial and orbitoprefrontal cortices, anterior cingulate gyrus, paracingulate gyrus, and insula. Anterior prefrontal cortex has been associated with monitoring of self-generated information and selection of appropriate executive processes, playing a central role in mediating dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortical interaction.64 Impairment in anteromedial prefrontal regions may contribute to some of the cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.
The anterior cingulate may be relevant to several psychiatric disorders having connections with the hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala. In schizophrenia, abnormalities in the anterior cingulate include increased glutamatergic axons,65 axospinous synapses,66 decreased inhibitory interneurons,67 and projection neuron loss in deeper laminae.68 Anterior cingulate volume reductions have been reported in first-episode16 and chronic61,63 schizophrenia. Functional imaging data suggest that anterior cingulate cortex may be essential for the internal monitoring necessary to engage top-down attentional processes in adapting to a changing environment.69,70 Disruption of cingulate-striate circuits has been associated with apathy and a lack of drive,71 characteristic negative symptoms of schizophrenia.
Recent studies have found decreased insular volume in first-episode16 and chronic54,61 schizophrenia. Functional imaging studies72,73 have reported reduced cerebral blood flow in insular cortex during verbal fluency and recognition memory tasks. The insula may also have a pivotal role in cognitive and emotional processes, permitting the internal representation of external events,74,75 and in the differentiation of internally and externally generated sensory stimuli.76 Impairment of these processes may mediate some perceptual disturbances in schizophrenia.
Abnormalities in the fasciculus uncinatus replicate findings from a recent study61 of patients with schizophrenia and predominantly negative symptoms. The fasciculus uncinatus is a bundle of association fibers connecting orbitofrontal, superofrontal, and middle frontal gyri with anterior temporal lobe cortex, and it may play an important role in schizophrenia. It contains the lateral cholinergic pathway originating in the nucleus basalis of Meynert and innervates frontal, parietal, and temporal neocortex.77 Cortical cholinergic pathways are important mediators in processing information essential for cognition.78 Fasciculus uncinatus abnormalities may explain the reduced postsynaptic prefrontal muscarinic receptor binding recently reported in schizophrenia.79 Right frontotemporal disconnection after injury to the right ventral frontal lobe and underlying fasciculus uncinatus leads to impaired awareness of self over time, which is integral to the formulation and implementation of future goals.80
White matter abnormalities may be relevant in schizophrenia. Schizophrenialike symptoms occur in metachromatic leukodystrophy,81 and recent diffusion imaging studies have reported reduced anisotropy in prefrontal white matter82,83 and corpus callosum,84 suggesting myelin or axonal abnormalities. Differential expression of myelination-related genes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex,85 apoptosis, and necrosis of oligodendroglial cells and damaged myelin sheaths in prefrontal cortex and caudate nucleus have been reported in schizophrenia.86 Myelination of frontotemporal connections continues into early adulthood.87 Delayed or abnormal frontotemporal myelination in schizophrenia could explain the onset of symptoms in early adulthood.
We did not demonstrate atrophy. Our volumetric findings are contrary to those of some studies demonstrating decreases in medial temporal lobe structures, particularly the hippocampus,17,88,89 superior temporal gyrus,90 insula,16 and prefrontal cortex54 in first-episode schizophrenia. This may reflect the heterogeneity of first-episode schizophrenia populations, which include patients with variable disease outcomes. However, there is considerable variance in image intensity in small medial temporal lobe structures, and some subcortical gray matter structures have image intensities similar to white matter, increasing risk of tissue misclassification during segmentation in these regions. Partial volume effects may have contributed, as the model assumes that all voxels contain only 1 tissue type, and those containing more than 1 may be modeled incorrectly. Accordingly, ROI methods may be more sensitive in such subcortical structures. These methodological problems, however, are unlikely to account for our findings for several reasons. First, the normalization and segmentation procedures used in SPM99 have been considered robust and accurate for volumetric T1-weighted images.47 Second, gray matter losses have been reported in cortical and subcortical gray matter in patients with chronic schizophrenia and other conditions using similar analysis methods.38,55,91-93 Third, we excluded nonbrain voxels and used a modulation step that allows comparison of absolute amounts of gray matter. Finally, despite normal findings in volumetric imaging, MTR abnormalities were detected in regions where volumetric deficits have been reported in chronic and first-episode studies.
The discrepancy between circumscribed MTR abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia reported herein and the more widespread abnormalities previously reported in chronic schizophrenia by Foong et al38 deserve comment. There are 2 possible explanations. The first assumes that any brain abnormalities in schizophrenia are static and that widespread cortical abnormalities occur only in those with severe, chronic disease. If this model is correct, a much larger sample of patients with first-episode schizophrenia than is reported herein would be required to ensure that sufficient numbers of patients destined to have severe chronic illness were included. The alternative is that brain abnormalities are progressive, at least in some patients, and that cortical abnormalities spread as disease becomes chronic. Support for this explanation accrues from the longitudinal study of Thompson et al94 reporting progressive gray matter loss extending from parietal regions to include temporal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and frontal eyefield cortices in a small sample with childhood-onset schizophrenia. Longitudinal studies are ongoing to determine whether the abnormalities we reported are progressive and the relationship to illness course and treatment response.
Several limitations of this study should be mentioned. There are potential limitations in the use of VBM that have been discussed in detail elsewhere.46-48,95 Data on MTRs could be prone to partial volume effects due to the 5-mm slices. However, we did not segment or warp the MTR data, which minimizes the risk of tissue misclassification. In addition, our post hoc native-space MTR ROI analysis was consistent with the SPM99 analysis. We reported cluster and voxel analyses for MTR data. Histograms of our data samples incorporating gray and white matter on a given slice resembled a Gaussian distribution, as previously demonstrated in chronic schizophrenia in reporting cluster analysis.38 The use of cluster size to assess significance in SPM is appropriate only if the data are normally distributed.47 It is possible that the MTR signal may not be normally distributed locally. A permutation analysis may be more reliable for cluster analysis in future studies. Most patients were receiving neuroleptic agents, and it could be argued that our findings may be different in a drug-naive population. However, there is little evidence from neuropathological studies, conducted mainly in animals, to suggest that neuroleptic medication causes or exacerbates brain abnormalities in schizophrenia,7 and most of our patients were receiving atypical neuroleptic agents for short periods, making this even less likely. Nonetheless, the effects of neuroleptic medication use on MTRs have not been studied and could be a potential confound. We repeated our analysis excluding the 5 unmedicated patients. Decreases in MTRs were found in the same regions. We did not analyze unmedicated patients separately because the sample size would have insufficient df to produce meaningful results. Our sample was relatively small, and it may not be possible to generalize our findings to other first-episode schizophrenia populations.
Corresponding author and reprints: Manny S. Bagary, MRCPsych, Box 15, Section of Neuropsychiatry and NMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG England (e-mail: m.bagary@ion.ucl.ac.uk).
Submitted for publication April 2, 2002; final revision received February 6, 2003; accepted February 7, 2003.
This study was supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust, London.
We thank the members of the NMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, for their assistance, and we thank all the patients and volunteers who participated in the study.
1.Shenton
ÌýMEDickey
ÌýCCFrumin
ÌýMMcCarley
ÌýRWÌýA review of MRI findings in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2001;491-Ìý52
2.Wright
ÌýICRabe-Hesketh
ÌýSWoodruff
ÌýPWRDavid
ÌýASMurray
ÌýRMBullmore
ÌýETÌýMeta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2000;15716-Ìý25
3.Wright
ÌýICSharma
ÌýTEllison
ÌýZRMcGuire
ÌýPKFriston
ÌýKJBrammer
ÌýMJMurray
ÌýRMBullmore
ÌýETÌýSupra-regional brain systems and the neuropathology of schizophrenia.ÌýÌýCereb Cortex. 1999;9366-Ìý378
4.Robbins
ÌýTÌýThe case for fronto-striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Bull. 1990;16391-Ìý401
5.Buchsbaum
ÌýMSHaier
ÌýRJPotkin
ÌýSGNuechterlein
ÌýKBracha
ÌýHSKatz
ÌýMLohr
ÌýJWu
ÌýJLottenberg
ÌýSJerabek
ÌýPAÌýFrontostriatal disorder of cerebral metabolism in never-medicated schizophrenics.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49935-Ìý942
6.Friston
ÌýKJFrith
ÌýCDÌýSchizophrenia: a disconnection syndrome?ÌýÌýClin Neurosci. 1995;389-Ìý97
7.Harrison
ÌýPÌýThe neuropathology of schizophrenia: a critical review of the data and their interpretation.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1999;122
(pt 4)
593-Ìý624
8.Andreason
ÌýNCArndt
ÌýSSwayze
ÌýVCizado
ÌýTFlaum
ÌýMO'Leary
ÌýDEhardt
ÌýJCYuh
ÌýWTÌýThalamic abnormalities in schizophrenia visualized through magnetic resonance image averaging.Ìý
Ìý³§³¦¾±±ð²Ô³¦±ð. 1994;266294-Ìý298
Google Scholar 9.Puri
ÌýBKHutton
ÌýSBSaeed
ÌýNOatridge
ÌýAHajnal
ÌýJVDuncan
ÌýLChapman
ÌýMJBarnes
ÌýTRBydder
ÌýGMJoyce
ÌýEMÌýA serial longitudinal quantitative MRI study of cerebral changes in first-episode schizophrenia using image segmentation and subvoxel registration.ÌýÌýPsychiatry Res. 2001;106141-Ìý150
10.DeLisi
ÌýLETew
ÌýWXie
ÌýSHoff
ÌýALSakuma
ÌýMKushner
ÌýMLee
ÌýGShedlack
ÌýKSmith
ÌýAMGrimson
ÌýRÌýA prospective follow-up study of brain morphology and cognition in first episode schizophrenic patients: preliminary findings.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1995;38349-Ìý360
11.Lim
ÌýKOTew
ÌýWKushner
ÌýMChow
ÌýKMatsumoto
ÌýBDeLisi
ÌýLEÌýCortical gray matter volume deficit in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1996;1531548-Ìý1553
12.Zipursky
ÌýRBLambe
ÌýEKKapur
ÌýSKMikulis
ÌýDJÌýCerebral gray matter volume deficits in first-episode psychosis.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55540-Ìý546
13.Lieberman
ÌýJAJody
ÌýDAlvir
ÌýJMAshtari
ÌýMLevy
ÌýDLBogerts
ÌýBDegreef
ÌýGMayerhoff
ÌýDICooper
ÌýTÌýBrain morphology, dopamine, and eye-tracking abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia: prevalence and clinical correlates.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50357-Ìý368
14.Barr
ÌýWBAshtari
ÌýMBilder
ÌýMDegreef
ÌýGLieberman
ÌýJÌýBrain morphometric comparison of first-episode schizophrenia and temporal lobe epilepsy.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 1997;170515-Ìý519
15.Gur
ÌýRETuretsky
ÌýBICowell
ÌýPEFinkelman
ÌýCMaany
ÌýVGrossman
ÌýRIArnold
ÌýSEBilker
ÌýWBGur
ÌýRCÌýTemporolimbic volume reductions in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57769-Ìý775
16.Crespo-Facorro
ÌýBKim
ÌýJAndreasen
ÌýNCO'Leary
ÌýDSBockholt
ÌýHJMagnotta
ÌýVÌýInsular cortex abnormalities in schizophrenia: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study of first-episode patients.Ìý
ÌýSchizophr Res. 2000;4635-Ìý43
Google Scholar 17.Heckers
ÌýSÌýNeuroimaging studies of the hippocampus in schizophrenia.ÌýÌý±á¾±±è±è´Ç³¦²¹³¾±è³Ü²õ. 2001;11520-Ìý528
18.DeLisi
ÌýLEStritzke
ÌýPRiordan
ÌýHHolan
ÌýVBoccio
ÌýAKushner
ÌýMMcClelland
ÌýJVan Eyl
ÌýOAnand
ÌýAÌýThe timing of brain morphological changes in schizophrenia and their relationship to clinical outcome.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1992;31241-Ìý254
19.Bilder
ÌýRMWu
ÌýHBogerts
ÌýBDegreef
ÌýGAshtari
ÌýMAlvir
ÌýJMSnyder
ÌýPJLieberman
ÌýJAÌýAbsence of regional hemispheric volume asymmetries in first-episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1994;1511437-Ìý1447
20.Razi
ÌýKGreene
ÌýKPSakuma
ÌýMGe
ÌýSKushner
ÌýMDeLisi
ÌýLEÌýReduction of the parahippocampal gyrus and the hippocampus in patients with chronic schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 1999;174512-Ìý519
21.Laakso
ÌýMPTiihonen
ÌýJSyvalahti
ÌýEVilkman
ÌýHLaakso
ÌýAAlakare
ÌýBRakkolainen
ÌýVSalokangas
ÌýRKKoivisto
ÌýEHietala
ÌýJÌýA morphometric MRI study of the hippocampus in first-episode, neuroleptic-naive schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2001;503-Ìý7
22.Wolff
ÌýSDBalaban
ÌýRSÌýMagnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Med. 1989;10135-Ìý144
23.Henkelman
ÌýRMStanisz
ÌýGJGraham
ÌýSJÌýMagnetization transfer in MRI: a review.ÌýÌýNMR Biomed. 2001;1457-Ìý64
24.Meyerhoff
ÌýDJÌýProton magnetization transfer of metabolites in human brain.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Med. 1999;42417-Ìý420
25.Mottershead
ÌýJPThornton
ÌýJSClemence
ÌýMScaravilli
ÌýFNewcombe
ÌýJCuzner
ÌýMLBarker
ÌýGJTofts
ÌýPSParker
ÌýGJMOrdidge
ÌýRJMiller
ÌýDHMcDonald
ÌýWIÌýCorrelation of spinal cord axonal density with post mortem NMR measurements in multiple sclerosis and controls [abstract].ÌýÌýProc Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 1998;6T2163
26.van Waesberghe
ÌýJHKamphorst
ÌýWDe Groot
ÌýCJvan Walderveen
ÌýMACastelijns
ÌýJARavid
ÌýRLycklama a Nijeholt
ÌýGJvan der Valk
ÌýPPolman
ÌýCHThompson
ÌýAJBarkhof
ÌýFÌýAxonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability.ÌýÌýAnn Neurol. 1999;46747-Ìý754
27.Dousset
ÌýVGrossman
ÌýRIRamer
ÌýKNSchnall
ÌýMDYoung
ÌýLHGonzalez-Scarano
ÌýFLavi
ÌýECohen
ÌýJAÌýExperimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 1992;182483-Ìý491
28.Deloire-Grassin
ÌýMSBrochet
ÌýBQuesson
ÌýBDelalande
ÌýCDousset
ÌýVCanioni
ÌýPPetry
ÌýKGÌýIn vivo evaluation of remyelination in rat brain by magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Sci. 2000;17810-Ìý16
29.Lexa
ÌýFJGrossman
ÌýRIRosenquist
ÌýACÌýMR of wallerian degeneration in the feline visual system: characterization by magnetization transfer rate with histopathologic correlation.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15201-Ìý212
30.Kimura
ÌýHMeaney
ÌýDFMcGowan
ÌýJCGrossman
ÌýRILenkinski
ÌýRERoss
ÌýDTMcIntosh
ÌýTKGennarelli
ÌýTASmith
ÌýDHÌýMagnetization transfer imaging of diffuse axonal injury following experimental brain injury in the pig: characterization by magnetization transfer ratio with histopathologic correlation.ÌýÌýJ Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20540-Ìý546
31.Gass
ÌýABarker
ÌýGJKidd
ÌýDThorpe
ÌýJWMacManus
ÌýDBrennan
ÌýATofts
ÌýPSThompson
ÌýAJMcDonald
ÌýWIMiller
ÌýDHÌýCorrelation of magnetization transfer ratio and clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.ÌýÌýAnn Neurol. 1994;3662-Ìý67
32.Silver
ÌýNCBarker
ÌýGJMacManus
ÌýDCThorpe
ÌýJWHoward
ÌýRMiller
ÌýDHÌýDecreased magnetization transfer ratio due to demyelination: a case of central pontine myelinolysis.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61208-Ìý209
33.Kado
ÌýHKimura
ÌýHTsuchida
ÌýTYonekura
ÌýYTokime
ÌýTTokuriki
ÌýYItoh
ÌýHÌýAbnormal magnetization transfer ratios in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images of patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22922-Ìý927
34.Bosma
ÌýGPRood
ÌýMJZwinderman
ÌýAHHuizinga
ÌýTWvan Buchem
ÌýMAÌýEvidence of central nervous system damage in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, demonstrated by magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýArthritis Rheum. 2000;4348-Ìý54
35.Ernst
ÌýTChang
ÌýLWitt
ÌýMWalot
ÌýIAronow
ÌýHLeonido-Yee
ÌýMSinger
ÌýEÌýProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and human immunodeficiency virus–associated white matter lesions in AIDS: magnetization transfer MR imaging.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 1999;210539-Ìý543
36.Sinson
ÌýGBagley
ÌýLJCecil
ÌýKMTorchia
ÌýMMcGowan
ÌýJCLenkinski
ÌýREMcIntosh
ÌýTKGrossman
ÌýRIÌýMagnetization transfer imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of axonal injury: correlation with clinical outcome after traumatic brain injury.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22143-Ìý151
37.Cercignani
ÌýMBozzali
ÌýMIannucci
ÌýGComi
ÌýGFilippi
ÌýMÌýMagnetization transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and gray matter from patients with multiple sclerosis.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70311-Ìý317
38.Foong
ÌýJSymms
ÌýMRBarker
ÌýGJMaier
ÌýMWoermann
ÌýFGMiller
ÌýDHRon
ÌýMAÌýNeuropathological abnormalities in schizophrenia: evidence from magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;124882-Ìý892
39.Selemon
ÌýLDGoldman-Rakic
ÌýPSÌýThe reduced neuropil hypothesis: a circuit based model of schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1999;4517-Ìý25
40.Andreason
ÌýNÌýMethods for assessing positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia: positive and negative symptoms and syndromes.ÌýAndreason
ÌýNed.ÌýModern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry. 24 Basel, Switzerland S Karger AG1990;73-Ìý85
41.Asberg
ÌýMMontgomery
ÌýSAPerris
ÌýCSchalling
ÌýDSedvall
ÌýGÌýA comprehensive psychopathological rating scale.ÌýÌýActa Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978;2715-Ìý27
42.Annett
ÌýMAÌýA classification of hand preference by association analysis.ÌýÌýBr J Psychol. 1970;61303-Ìý321
43.Goldthorpe
ÌýJHHope
ÌýKÌýThe Social Grading of Occupations: A New Approach and Scale.Ìý Oxford, England Clarendon Press1974;
44.Nelson
ÌýHWillison
ÌýJÌýThe National Adult Reading Test (NART).Ìý2nd Windsor, England NFER-Nelson1991;
45.Barker
ÌýGJTofts
ÌýPSGass
ÌýAÌýAn interleaved sequence for accurate and reproducible clinical measurement of magnetization transfer ratio.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Imaging. 1996;14403-Ìý411
46.Good
ÌýCDJohnsrude
ÌýISAshburner
ÌýJHenson
ÌýRNFriston
ÌýKJFrackowiak
ÌýRSÌýA voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;14
(pt 1)
21-Ìý36
47.Ashburner
ÌýJFriston
ÌýKJÌýVoxel based morphometry: the methods.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2000;11805-Ìý821
48.Ashburner
ÌýJFriston
ÌýKJÌýWhy voxel-based morphometry should be used.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141238-Ìý1243
49.Symms
ÌýMBarker
ÌýGHolmes
ÌýAÌýA rapid automated system for detection of serial changes in transient ischaemic attack using registration and subtraction of three dimensional images[abstract].ÌýÌýProc Int Soc Magn Reons Med. 1997;5584
50.Woods
ÌýRCherry
ÌýSMazziotta
ÌýJÌýRapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images.ÌýÌýJ Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16620-Ìý633
51.Friston
ÌýKJHolmes
ÌýAPoline
ÌýJBPrice
ÌýCJFrith
ÌýCDÌýDetecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1996;4
(pt 1)
223-Ìý235
52.Stoeckael
ÌýJPoline
ÌýJBMalandain
ÌýGAyache
ÌýNDarcourt
ÌýJÌýSmoothness and degrees of freedom restrictions when using SPM99 [abstract].ÌýÌýHum Brain Mapp. 2001;14suppl11365
53.Wright
ÌýICMcGuire
ÌýPKPoline
ÌýJBTravere
ÌýJMMurray
ÌýRMFrith
ÌýCDFrackowiak
ÌýRSFriston
ÌýKJÌýA voxel-based method for the statistical analysis of gray and white matter density applied to schizophrenia.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1995;2244-Ìý252
54.Wright
ÌýICEllison
ÌýZRSharma
ÌýTFriston
ÌýKJMurray
ÌýRMMcGuire
ÌýPKÌýMapping of gray matter changes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 1999;351-Ìý14
55.Wilke
ÌýMKaufmann
ÌýCGrabner
ÌýAPutz
ÌýBWetter
ÌýTCAuer
ÌýDPÌýGray matter changes and correlates of disease severity in schizophrenia: a statistical parametric mapping study.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;13814-Ìý824
56.Poline
ÌýJBWorsley
ÌýKJEvans
ÌýACFriston
ÌýKJÌýCombining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1997;583-Ìý96
57.Sowell
ÌýERThompson
ÌýPMHolmes
ÌýCJBatth
ÌýRJernigan
ÌýTLToga
ÌýAWÌýLocalizing age-related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical parametric mapping.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1999;9
(pt 1)
587-Ìý597
58.Talairach
ÌýJTournoux
ÌýPÌýCo-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain.Ìý New York, NY Thieme Medical Publisher1988;
59.Plummer
ÌýDLÌýDispImage: a display and analysis tool for medical images.ÌýÌýRiv Neuroradiol. 1992;5489-Ìý495
60.Yee
ÌýBKÌýCytotoxic lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex abolishes the partial reinforcement extinction effect, attenuates prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex and induces transient hyperlocomotion, while sparing spontaneous object recognition memory in the rat.ÌýÌýNeuroscience. 2000;95675-Ìý689
61.Sigmundsson
ÌýTSuckling
ÌýJMaier
ÌýMWilliams
ÌýSBullmore
ÌýEGreenwood
ÌýKFukuda
ÌýRRon
ÌýMToone
ÌýBÌýStructural abnormalities in frontal, temporal and limbic regions and interconnecting white matter tracts in schizophrenic patients with prominent negative symptoms.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2001;158234-Ìý243
62.Hulshoff Pol
ÌýHESchnack
ÌýHGMandl
ÌýRCvan Haren
ÌýNEKoning
ÌýHCollins
ÌýDLEvans
ÌýACKahn
ÌýRSÌýFocal gray matter density changes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;581118-Ìý1125
63.Goldstein
ÌýJMGoodman
ÌýJMSeidman
ÌýLJKennedy
ÌýDNMakris
ÌýNLee
ÌýHTourville
ÌýICaviness
ÌýVSFaraone
ÌýSVTsuang
ÌýMTÌýCortical abnormalities in schizophrenia identified by structural magnetic resonance imaging.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56537-Ìý547
64.Fletcher
ÌýPCHenson
ÌýRNÌýFrontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;124
(pt 5)
849-Ìý881
65.Benes
ÌýFMVincent
ÌýSLAlsterberg
ÌýGBird
ÌýEDSanGiovanni
ÌýJPÌýIncreased GABAA receptor binding in superficial layers of cingulate cortex in schizophrenics.ÌýÌýJ Neurosci. 1992;12924-Ìý929
66.Aganova
ÌýEAUranova
ÌýNAÌýMorphometric analysis of synaptic contacts in the anterior limbic cortex in the endogenous psychoses.ÌýÌýNeurosci Behav Physiol. 1992;2259-Ìý65
67.Benes
ÌýFMMcSparren
ÌýJBird
ÌýEDSanGiovanni
ÌýJPVincent
ÌýSLÌýDeficits in small interneurons in prefrontal and cingulate cortices of schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48996-Ìý1001
68.Benes
ÌýFMVincent
ÌýSLTodtenkopf
ÌýMÌýThe density of pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons in anterior cingulate cortex of schizophrenic and bipolar subjects.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 2001;50395-Ìý406
69.Bunge
ÌýSAOchsner
ÌýKNDesmond
ÌýJEGlover
ÌýGHGabrieli
ÌýJDÌýPrefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;1242074-Ìý2086
70.van Veen
ÌýVCohen
ÌýJDBotvinick
ÌýMMStenger
ÌýVACarter
ÌýCSÌýAnterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141302-Ìý1308
71.Cummings
ÌýJLÌýFrontal-subcortical circuits and human behaviour.ÌýÌýArch Neurol. 1993;50873-Ìý878
72.Curtis
ÌýVABullmore
ÌýETBrammer
ÌýMIWrigth
ÌýICWilliams
ÌýSCMorris
ÌýRGSharma
ÌýTSMurray
ÌýRMMcGuire
ÌýPKÌýAttenuated frontal activation during verbal fluency tasks in patients with schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1998;1551056-Ìý1063
73.Crespo-Facorro
ÌýBWiser
ÌýAKAndreasen
ÌýNCO'Leary
ÌýDSWatkins
ÌýGLPonto
ÌýLLHichwa
ÌýRDÌýNeural basis of novel and well-learned recognition memory in schizophrenia: a positron emission tomography study.Ìý
ÌýHum Brain Mapp. 2001;12219-Ìý231
Google Scholar 74.Augustine
ÌýJRÌýCircuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans.ÌýÌýBrain Res Brain Res Rev. 1996;22229-Ìý244
75.Cancelliere
ÌýAEKertesz
ÌýAÌýLesion localisation in acquired deficits of emotional expression and comprehension.ÌýÌýBrain Cogn. 1990;13133-Ìý147
76.Mesulam
ÌýMMufson
ÌýEÌýInsula of the Old World monkey, II: efferent cortical output and comments on function.ÌýÌýJ Comp Neurol. 1982;21238-Ìý52
77.Selden
ÌýNRGitelman
ÌýDRSalamon-Murayama
ÌýNParrish
ÌýTBMesulam
ÌýMMÌýTrajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1998;121
(pt 12)
2249-Ìý2257
78.Mesulam
ÌýMMÌýBehavioral neuroanatomy of cholinergic innervation in the primate cerebral cortex.ÌýÌýEXS. 1989;571-Ìý11
79.Crook
ÌýJMTomaskovic-Crook
ÌýECopolov
ÌýDLDean
ÌýBÌýLow muscarinic receptor binding in prefrontal cortex from subjects with schizophrenia: a study of Brodmann's areas 8, 9, 10, and 46 and the effects of neuroleptic drug treatment.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2001;158918-Ìý925
80.Levine
ÌýBBlack
ÌýSECabeza
ÌýRSinden
ÌýMMcintosh
ÌýARToth
ÌýJPTulving
ÌýEStuss
ÌýDTÌýEpisodic memory and the self in a case of isolated retrograde amnesia.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1998;121
(pt 10)
1951-Ìý1973
81.Hyde
ÌýTMZiegler
ÌýJCWeinberger
ÌýDRÌýPsychiatric disturbances in metachromatic leukodystrophy: insights into the neurobiology of psychosis.ÌýÌýArch Neurol. 1992;49401-Ìý406
82.Buchsbaum
ÌýMSTang
ÌýCYPeled
ÌýSGudbjartsson
ÌýHLu
ÌýDHazlett
ÌýEADownhill
ÌýJHaznedar
ÌýMFallon
ÌýJHAtlas
ÌýSWÌýMRI white matter diffusion anisotropy and PET metabolic rate in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýNeuroreport. 1998;9425-Ìý430
83.Lim
ÌýKOHedehus
ÌýMMoseley
ÌýMde Crespigny
ÌýASullivan
ÌýEPfeferbaum
ÌýAÌýCompromised white matter tract integrity in schizophrenia inferred from diffusion tensor imaging.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56367-Ìý374
84.Foong
ÌýJMaier
ÌýMDark
ÌýABarker
ÌýGJMiller
ÌýDHRon
ÌýMAÌýNeuropathological abnormalities of the corpus callosum in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68242-Ìý244
85.Hakak
ÌýYWalker
ÌýJRLi
ÌýCWong
ÌýWHDavis
ÌýKLBuxbaum
ÌýJDHaroutunian
ÌýVFienberg
ÌýAAÌýGenome-wide expression analysis reveals dysregulation of myelination-related genes in chronic schizophrenia.ÌýÌýProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;984746-Ìý4751
86.Uranova
ÌýNOrlovskaya
ÌýDVikhreva
ÌýOZimina
ÌýIKolomeets
ÌýNVostrikov
ÌýVRachmanova
ÌýVÌýElectron microscopy of oligodendroglia in severe mental illness.ÌýÌýBrain Res Bull. 2001;55597-Ìý561
87.Benes
ÌýFMÌýMyelination of cortical-hippocampal relays during late adolescence.ÌýÌýSchizophr Bull. 1989;15585-Ìý593
88.Bilder
ÌýRMBogerts
ÌýBAshtari
ÌýMWu
ÌýHAlvir
ÌýJMJody
ÌýDReiter
ÌýGBell
ÌýLLieberman
ÌýJAÌýAnterior hippocampal volume reductions predict frontal lobe dysfunction in first episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 1995;1747-Ìý58
89.Copolov
ÌýDVelakoulis
ÌýDMcGorry
ÌýPMallard
ÌýCarinaYung
ÌýARees
ÌýSJackson
ÌýGRehn
ÌýABrewer
ÌýWPantelis
ÌýCÌýNeurobiological findings in early phase schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBrain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;31157-Ìý165
90.Hirayasu
ÌýYShenton
ÌýMESalisbury
ÌýDFDickey
ÌýCCFischer
ÌýIAMazzoni
ÌýPKisler
ÌýTArakaki
ÌýHKwon
ÌýJSAnderson
ÌýJEYurgelun-Todd
ÌýDTohen
ÌýMMcCarley
ÌýRWÌýLower left temporal lobe MRI volumes in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with psychotic patients with first-episode affective disorder and normal subjects.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1998;1551384-Ìý1391
91.Rosen
ÌýHJGorno-Tempini
ÌýMLGoldman
ÌýWPPerry
ÌýRJSchuff
ÌýNWeiner
ÌýMFeiwell
ÌýRKramer
ÌýJHMiller
ÌýBLÌýPatterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia.ÌýÌýNeurology. 2002;58198-Ìý208
92.Ananth
ÌýHPopescu
ÌýICritchley
ÌýHDGood
ÌýCDFrackowiak
ÌýRSDolan
ÌýRJÌýCortical and subcortical gray matter abnormalities in schizophrenia determined through structural magnetic resonance imaging with optimized volumetric voxel-based morphometry.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2002;1591497-Ìý1505
93.Thieben
ÌýMJDuggins
ÌýAJGood
ÌýCDGomes
ÌýLMahant
ÌýNRichards
ÌýFMcCusker
ÌýEFrackowiak
ÌýRSÌýThe distribution of structural neuropathology in pre-clinical Huntington's disease.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2002;125
(pt 8)
1815-Ìý1828
94.Thompson
ÌýPMVidal
ÌýCGiedd
ÌýJNGochman
ÌýPBlumenthal
ÌýJNicolson
ÌýRToga
ÌýAWRapoport
ÌýJLÌýMapping adolescent brain change reveals dynamic wave of accelerated gray matter loss in very early-onset schizophrenia.ÌýÌýProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;9811650-Ìý11655
95.Bookstein
ÌýFLÌýVoxel-based morphometry should not be used with imperfectly registered images.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141454-Ìý1462