ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1.Ìý

Glass brain image of magnetization transfer ratio reductions in patients with first-episode schizophrenia vs controls. Arrowheads indicate peak voxel. SPM indicates statistical parametric map. Height threshold: t = 3.24; P = .001.

Figure 2.Ìý

Magnetization transfer ratio reductions in patients with first-episode schizophrenia vs controls (peak voxel in the left insula) demonstrating bilateral reductions in the insula and subcortical white matter rendered onto a T1-weighted image (threshold t = 3.97).

Figure 3.Ìý

Magnetization transfer ratio reductions in patients with first-episode schizophrenia vs controls (peak voxel in the right prefrontal cortex) demonstrating bilateral (right greater than left) reductions rendered onto a T1-weighted image (threshold t = 3.97).

Table 1.Ìý
Demographic and Clinical Data for 60 Study Participants
Table 2.Ìý
SPM Statistics of Relative Regional MTR Decreases in 30 Patients* With First-Episode Schizophrenia vs 30 Controls†
Table 3.Ìý
Post hoc Region of Interest Analysis of MTRs in the Prefrontal Cortex and Insula in a Sample of 8 Male, Right-handed Patients With First-Episode Schizophrenia and 8 Matched Control Subjects Using Native-Space MTR Images*
1.
Shenton ÌýMEDickey ÌýCCFrumin ÌýMMcCarley ÌýRWÌýA review of MRI findings in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2001;491-Ìý52
2.
Wright ÌýICRabe-Hesketh ÌýSWoodruff ÌýPWRDavid ÌýASMurray ÌýRMBullmore ÌýETÌýMeta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2000;15716-Ìý25
3.
Wright ÌýICSharma ÌýTEllison ÌýZRMcGuire ÌýPKFriston ÌýKJBrammer ÌýMJMurray ÌýRMBullmore ÌýETÌýSupra-regional brain systems and the neuropathology of schizophrenia.ÌýÌýCereb Cortex. 1999;9366-Ìý378
4.
Robbins ÌýTÌýThe case for fronto-striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Bull. 1990;16391-Ìý401
5.
Buchsbaum ÌýMSHaier ÌýRJPotkin ÌýSGNuechterlein ÌýKBracha ÌýHSKatz ÌýMLohr ÌýJWu ÌýJLottenberg ÌýSJerabek ÌýPAÌýFrontostriatal disorder of cerebral metabolism in never-medicated schizophrenics.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49935-Ìý942
6.
Friston ÌýKJFrith ÌýCDÌýSchizophrenia: a disconnection syndrome?ÌýÌýClin Neurosci. 1995;389-Ìý97
7.
Harrison ÌýPÌýThe neuropathology of schizophrenia: a critical review of the data and their interpretation.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1999;122 (pt 4) 593-Ìý624
8.
Andreason ÌýNCArndt ÌýSSwayze ÌýVCizado ÌýTFlaum ÌýMO'Leary ÌýDEhardt ÌýJCYuh ÌýWTÌýThalamic abnormalities in schizophrenia visualized through magnetic resonance image averaging.ÌýÌý³§³¦¾±±ð²Ô³¦±ð. 1994;266294-Ìý298Google Scholar
9.
Puri ÌýBKHutton ÌýSBSaeed ÌýNOatridge ÌýAHajnal ÌýJVDuncan ÌýLChapman ÌýMJBarnes ÌýTRBydder ÌýGMJoyce ÌýEMÌýA serial longitudinal quantitative MRI study of cerebral changes in first-episode schizophrenia using image segmentation and subvoxel registration.ÌýÌýPsychiatry Res. 2001;106141-Ìý150
10.
DeLisi ÌýLETew ÌýWXie ÌýSHoff ÌýALSakuma ÌýMKushner ÌýMLee ÌýGShedlack ÌýKSmith ÌýAMGrimson ÌýRÌýA prospective follow-up study of brain morphology and cognition in first episode schizophrenic patients: preliminary findings.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1995;38349-Ìý360
11.
Lim ÌýKOTew ÌýWKushner ÌýMChow ÌýKMatsumoto ÌýBDeLisi ÌýLEÌýCortical gray matter volume deficit in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1996;1531548-Ìý1553
12.
Zipursky ÌýRBLambe ÌýEKKapur ÌýSKMikulis ÌýDJÌýCerebral gray matter volume deficits in first-episode psychosis.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55540-Ìý546
13.
Lieberman ÌýJAJody ÌýDAlvir ÌýJMAshtari ÌýMLevy ÌýDLBogerts ÌýBDegreef ÌýGMayerhoff ÌýDICooper ÌýTÌýBrain morphology, dopamine, and eye-tracking abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia: prevalence and clinical correlates.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50357-Ìý368
14.
Barr ÌýWBAshtari ÌýMBilder ÌýMDegreef ÌýGLieberman ÌýJÌýBrain morphometric comparison of first-episode schizophrenia and temporal lobe epilepsy.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 1997;170515-Ìý519
15.
Gur ÌýRETuretsky ÌýBICowell ÌýPEFinkelman ÌýCMaany ÌýVGrossman ÌýRIArnold ÌýSEBilker ÌýWBGur ÌýRCÌýTemporolimbic volume reductions in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57769-Ìý775
16.
Crespo-Facorro ÌýBKim ÌýJAndreasen ÌýNCO'Leary ÌýDSBockholt ÌýHJMagnotta ÌýVÌýInsular cortex abnormalities in schizophrenia: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study of first-episode patients.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2000;4635-Ìý43Google Scholar
17.
Heckers ÌýSÌýNeuroimaging studies of the hippocampus in schizophrenia.ÌýÌý±á¾±±è±è´Ç³¦²¹³¾±è³Ü²õ. 2001;11520-Ìý528
18.
DeLisi ÌýLEStritzke ÌýPRiordan ÌýHHolan ÌýVBoccio ÌýAKushner ÌýMMcClelland ÌýJVan Eyl ÌýOAnand ÌýAÌýThe timing of brain morphological changes in schizophrenia and their relationship to clinical outcome.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1992;31241-Ìý254
19.
Bilder ÌýRMWu ÌýHBogerts ÌýBDegreef ÌýGAshtari ÌýMAlvir ÌýJMSnyder ÌýPJLieberman ÌýJAÌýAbsence of regional hemispheric volume asymmetries in first-episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1994;1511437-Ìý1447
20.
Razi ÌýKGreene ÌýKPSakuma ÌýMGe ÌýSKushner ÌýMDeLisi ÌýLEÌýReduction of the parahippocampal gyrus and the hippocampus in patients with chronic schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 1999;174512-Ìý519
21.
Laakso ÌýMPTiihonen ÌýJSyvalahti ÌýEVilkman ÌýHLaakso ÌýAAlakare ÌýBRakkolainen ÌýVSalokangas ÌýRKKoivisto ÌýEHietala ÌýJÌýA morphometric MRI study of the hippocampus in first-episode, neuroleptic-naive schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2001;503-Ìý7
22.
Wolff ÌýSDBalaban ÌýRSÌýMagnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Med. 1989;10135-Ìý144
23.
Henkelman ÌýRMStanisz ÌýGJGraham ÌýSJÌýMagnetization transfer in MRI: a review.ÌýÌýNMR Biomed. 2001;1457-Ìý64
24.
Meyerhoff ÌýDJÌýProton magnetization transfer of metabolites in human brain.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Med. 1999;42417-Ìý420
25.
Mottershead ÌýJPThornton ÌýJSClemence ÌýMScaravilli ÌýFNewcombe ÌýJCuzner ÌýMLBarker ÌýGJTofts ÌýPSParker ÌýGJMOrdidge ÌýRJMiller ÌýDHMcDonald ÌýWIÌýCorrelation of spinal cord axonal density with post mortem NMR measurements in multiple sclerosis and controls [abstract].ÌýÌýProc Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 1998;6T2163
26.
van Waesberghe ÌýJHKamphorst ÌýWDe Groot ÌýCJvan Walderveen ÌýMACastelijns ÌýJARavid ÌýRLycklama a Nijeholt ÌýGJvan der Valk ÌýPPolman ÌýCHThompson ÌýAJBarkhof ÌýFÌýAxonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability.ÌýÌýAnn Neurol. 1999;46747-Ìý754
27.
Dousset ÌýVGrossman ÌýRIRamer ÌýKNSchnall ÌýMDYoung ÌýLHGonzalez-Scarano ÌýFLavi ÌýECohen ÌýJAÌýExperimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 1992;182483-Ìý491
28.
Deloire-Grassin ÌýMSBrochet ÌýBQuesson ÌýBDelalande ÌýCDousset ÌýVCanioni ÌýPPetry ÌýKGÌýIn vivo evaluation of remyelination in rat brain by magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Sci. 2000;17810-Ìý16
29.
Lexa ÌýFJGrossman ÌýRIRosenquist ÌýACÌýMR of wallerian degeneration in the feline visual system: characterization by magnetization transfer rate with histopathologic correlation.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15201-Ìý212
30.
Kimura ÌýHMeaney ÌýDFMcGowan ÌýJCGrossman ÌýRILenkinski ÌýRERoss ÌýDTMcIntosh ÌýTKGennarelli ÌýTASmith ÌýDHÌýMagnetization transfer imaging of diffuse axonal injury following experimental brain injury in the pig: characterization by magnetization transfer ratio with histopathologic correlation.ÌýÌýJ Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20540-Ìý546
31.
Gass ÌýABarker ÌýGJKidd ÌýDThorpe ÌýJWMacManus ÌýDBrennan ÌýATofts ÌýPSThompson ÌýAJMcDonald ÌýWIMiller ÌýDHÌýCorrelation of magnetization transfer ratio and clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.ÌýÌýAnn Neurol. 1994;3662-Ìý67
32.
Silver ÌýNCBarker ÌýGJMacManus ÌýDCThorpe ÌýJWHoward ÌýRMiller ÌýDHÌýDecreased magnetization transfer ratio due to demyelination: a case of central pontine myelinolysis.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61208-Ìý209
33.
Kado ÌýHKimura ÌýHTsuchida ÌýTYonekura ÌýYTokime ÌýTTokuriki ÌýYItoh ÌýHÌýAbnormal magnetization transfer ratios in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images of patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22922-Ìý927
34.
Bosma ÌýGPRood ÌýMJZwinderman ÌýAHHuizinga ÌýTWvan Buchem ÌýMAÌýEvidence of central nervous system damage in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, demonstrated by magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýArthritis Rheum. 2000;4348-Ìý54
35.
Ernst ÌýTChang ÌýLWitt ÌýMWalot ÌýIAronow ÌýHLeonido-Yee ÌýMSinger ÌýEÌýProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and human immunodeficiency virus–associated white matter lesions in AIDS: magnetization transfer MR imaging.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 1999;210539-Ìý543
36.
Sinson ÌýGBagley ÌýLJCecil ÌýKMTorchia ÌýMMcGowan ÌýJCLenkinski ÌýREMcIntosh ÌýTKGrossman ÌýRIÌýMagnetization transfer imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of axonal injury: correlation with clinical outcome after traumatic brain injury.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22143-Ìý151
37.
Cercignani ÌýMBozzali ÌýMIannucci ÌýGComi ÌýGFilippi ÌýMÌýMagnetization transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and gray matter from patients with multiple sclerosis.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70311-Ìý317
38.
Foong ÌýJSymms ÌýMRBarker ÌýGJMaier ÌýMWoermann ÌýFGMiller ÌýDHRon ÌýMAÌýNeuropathological abnormalities in schizophrenia: evidence from magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;124882-Ìý892
39.
Selemon ÌýLDGoldman-Rakic ÌýPSÌýThe reduced neuropil hypothesis: a circuit based model of schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1999;4517-Ìý25
40.
Andreason ÌýNÌýMethods for assessing positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia: positive and negative symptoms and syndromes.ÌýAndreason ÌýNed.ÌýModern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry. 24 Basel, Switzerland S Karger AG1990;73-Ìý85
41.
Asberg ÌýMMontgomery ÌýSAPerris ÌýCSchalling ÌýDSedvall ÌýGÌýA comprehensive psychopathological rating scale.ÌýÌýActa Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978;2715-Ìý27
42.
Annett ÌýMAÌýA classification of hand preference by association analysis.ÌýÌýBr J Psychol. 1970;61303-Ìý321
43.
Goldthorpe ÌýJHHope ÌýKÌýThe Social Grading of Occupations: A New Approach and Scale.Ìý Oxford, England Clarendon Press1974;
44.
Nelson ÌýHWillison ÌýJÌýThe National Adult Reading Test (NART).Ìý2nd Windsor, England NFER-Nelson1991;
45.
Barker ÌýGJTofts ÌýPSGass ÌýAÌýAn interleaved sequence for accurate and reproducible clinical measurement of magnetization transfer ratio.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Imaging. 1996;14403-Ìý411
46.
Good ÌýCDJohnsrude ÌýISAshburner ÌýJHenson ÌýRNFriston ÌýKJFrackowiak ÌýRSÌýA voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;14 (pt 1) 21-Ìý36
47.
Ashburner ÌýJFriston ÌýKJÌýVoxel based morphometry: the methods.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2000;11805-Ìý821
48.
Ashburner ÌýJFriston ÌýKJÌýWhy voxel-based morphometry should be used.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141238-Ìý1243
49.
Symms ÌýMBarker ÌýGHolmes ÌýAÌýA rapid automated system for detection of serial changes in transient ischaemic attack using registration and subtraction of three dimensional images[abstract].ÌýÌýProc Int Soc Magn Reons Med. 1997;5584
50.
Woods ÌýRCherry ÌýSMazziotta ÌýJÌýRapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images.ÌýÌýJ Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16620-Ìý633
51.
Friston ÌýKJHolmes ÌýAPoline ÌýJBPrice ÌýCJFrith ÌýCDÌýDetecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1996;4 (pt 1) 223-Ìý235
52.
Stoeckael ÌýJPoline ÌýJBMalandain ÌýGAyache ÌýNDarcourt ÌýJÌýSmoothness and degrees of freedom restrictions when using SPM99 [abstract].ÌýÌýHum Brain Mapp. 2001;14suppl11365
53.
Wright ÌýICMcGuire ÌýPKPoline ÌýJBTravere ÌýJMMurray ÌýRMFrith ÌýCDFrackowiak ÌýRSFriston ÌýKJÌýA voxel-based method for the statistical analysis of gray and white matter density applied to schizophrenia.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1995;2244-Ìý252
54.
Wright ÌýICEllison ÌýZRSharma ÌýTFriston ÌýKJMurray ÌýRMMcGuire ÌýPKÌýMapping of gray matter changes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 1999;351-Ìý14
55.
Wilke ÌýMKaufmann ÌýCGrabner ÌýAPutz ÌýBWetter ÌýTCAuer ÌýDPÌýGray matter changes and correlates of disease severity in schizophrenia: a statistical parametric mapping study.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;13814-Ìý824
56.
Poline ÌýJBWorsley ÌýKJEvans ÌýACFriston ÌýKJÌýCombining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1997;583-Ìý96
57.
Sowell ÌýERThompson ÌýPMHolmes ÌýCJBatth ÌýRJernigan ÌýTLToga ÌýAWÌýLocalizing age-related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical parametric mapping.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1999;9 (pt 1) 587-Ìý597
58.
Talairach ÌýJTournoux ÌýPÌýCo-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain.Ìý New York, NY Thieme Medical Publisher1988;
59.
Plummer ÌýDLÌýDispImage: a display and analysis tool for medical images.ÌýÌýRiv Neuroradiol. 1992;5489-Ìý495
60.
Yee ÌýBKÌýCytotoxic lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex abolishes the partial reinforcement extinction effect, attenuates prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex and induces transient hyperlocomotion, while sparing spontaneous object recognition memory in the rat.ÌýÌýNeuroscience. 2000;95675-Ìý689
61.
Sigmundsson ÌýTSuckling ÌýJMaier ÌýMWilliams ÌýSBullmore ÌýEGreenwood ÌýKFukuda ÌýRRon ÌýMToone ÌýBÌýStructural abnormalities in frontal, temporal and limbic regions and interconnecting white matter tracts in schizophrenic patients with prominent negative symptoms.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2001;158234-Ìý243
62.
Hulshoff Pol ÌýHESchnack ÌýHGMandl ÌýRCvan Haren ÌýNEKoning ÌýHCollins ÌýDLEvans ÌýACKahn ÌýRSÌýFocal gray matter density changes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;581118-Ìý1125
63.
Goldstein ÌýJMGoodman ÌýJMSeidman ÌýLJKennedy ÌýDNMakris ÌýNLee ÌýHTourville ÌýICaviness ÌýVSFaraone ÌýSVTsuang ÌýMTÌýCortical abnormalities in schizophrenia identified by structural magnetic resonance imaging.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56537-Ìý547
64.
Fletcher ÌýPCHenson ÌýRNÌýFrontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;124 (pt 5) 849-Ìý881
65.
Benes ÌýFMVincent ÌýSLAlsterberg ÌýGBird ÌýEDSanGiovanni ÌýJPÌýIncreased GABAA receptor binding in superficial layers of cingulate cortex in schizophrenics.ÌýÌýJ Neurosci. 1992;12924-Ìý929
66.
Aganova ÌýEAUranova ÌýNAÌýMorphometric analysis of synaptic contacts in the anterior limbic cortex in the endogenous psychoses.ÌýÌýNeurosci Behav Physiol. 1992;2259-Ìý65
67.
Benes ÌýFMMcSparren ÌýJBird ÌýEDSanGiovanni ÌýJPVincent ÌýSLÌýDeficits in small interneurons in prefrontal and cingulate cortices of schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48996-Ìý1001
68.
Benes ÌýFMVincent ÌýSLTodtenkopf ÌýMÌýThe density of pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons in anterior cingulate cortex of schizophrenic and bipolar subjects.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 2001;50395-Ìý406
69.
Bunge ÌýSAOchsner ÌýKNDesmond ÌýJEGlover ÌýGHGabrieli ÌýJDÌýPrefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;1242074-Ìý2086
70.
van Veen ÌýVCohen ÌýJDBotvinick ÌýMMStenger ÌýVACarter ÌýCSÌýAnterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141302-Ìý1308
71.
Cummings ÌýJLÌýFrontal-subcortical circuits and human behaviour.ÌýÌýArch Neurol. 1993;50873-Ìý878
72.
Curtis ÌýVABullmore ÌýETBrammer ÌýMIWrigth ÌýICWilliams ÌýSCMorris ÌýRGSharma ÌýTSMurray ÌýRMMcGuire ÌýPKÌýAttenuated frontal activation during verbal fluency tasks in patients with schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1998;1551056-Ìý1063
73.
Crespo-Facorro ÌýBWiser ÌýAKAndreasen ÌýNCO'Leary ÌýDSWatkins ÌýGLPonto ÌýLLHichwa ÌýRDÌýNeural basis of novel and well-learned recognition memory in schizophrenia: a positron emission tomography study.ÌýÌýHum Brain Mapp. 2001;12219-Ìý231Google Scholar
74.
Augustine ÌýJRÌýCircuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans.ÌýÌýBrain Res Brain Res Rev. 1996;22229-Ìý244
75.
Cancelliere ÌýAEKertesz ÌýAÌýLesion localisation in acquired deficits of emotional expression and comprehension.ÌýÌýBrain Cogn. 1990;13133-Ìý147
76.
Mesulam ÌýMMufson ÌýEÌýInsula of the Old World monkey, II: efferent cortical output and comments on function.ÌýÌýJ Comp Neurol. 1982;21238-Ìý52
77.
Selden ÌýNRGitelman ÌýDRSalamon-Murayama ÌýNParrish ÌýTBMesulam ÌýMMÌýTrajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1998;121 (pt 12) 2249-Ìý2257
78.
Mesulam ÌýMMÌýBehavioral neuroanatomy of cholinergic innervation in the primate cerebral cortex.ÌýÌýEXS. 1989;571-Ìý11
79.
Crook ÌýJMTomaskovic-Crook ÌýECopolov ÌýDLDean ÌýBÌýLow muscarinic receptor binding in prefrontal cortex from subjects with schizophrenia: a study of Brodmann's areas 8, 9, 10, and 46 and the effects of neuroleptic drug treatment.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2001;158918-Ìý925
80.
Levine ÌýBBlack ÌýSECabeza ÌýRSinden ÌýMMcintosh ÌýARToth ÌýJPTulving ÌýEStuss ÌýDTÌýEpisodic memory and the self in a case of isolated retrograde amnesia.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1998;121 (pt 10) 1951-Ìý1973
81.
Hyde ÌýTMZiegler ÌýJCWeinberger ÌýDRÌýPsychiatric disturbances in metachromatic leukodystrophy: insights into the neurobiology of psychosis.ÌýÌýArch Neurol. 1992;49401-Ìý406
82.
Buchsbaum ÌýMSTang ÌýCYPeled ÌýSGudbjartsson ÌýHLu ÌýDHazlett ÌýEADownhill ÌýJHaznedar ÌýMFallon ÌýJHAtlas ÌýSWÌýMRI white matter diffusion anisotropy and PET metabolic rate in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýNeuroreport. 1998;9425-Ìý430
83.
Lim ÌýKOHedehus ÌýMMoseley ÌýMde Crespigny ÌýASullivan ÌýEPfeferbaum ÌýAÌýCompromised white matter tract integrity in schizophrenia inferred from diffusion tensor imaging.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56367-Ìý374
84.
Foong ÌýJMaier ÌýMDark ÌýABarker ÌýGJMiller ÌýDHRon ÌýMAÌýNeuropathological abnormalities of the corpus callosum in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68242-Ìý244
85.
Hakak ÌýYWalker ÌýJRLi ÌýCWong ÌýWHDavis ÌýKLBuxbaum ÌýJDHaroutunian ÌýVFienberg ÌýAAÌýGenome-wide expression analysis reveals dysregulation of myelination-related genes in chronic schizophrenia.ÌýÌýProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;984746-Ìý4751
86.
Uranova ÌýNOrlovskaya ÌýDVikhreva ÌýOZimina ÌýIKolomeets ÌýNVostrikov ÌýVRachmanova ÌýVÌýElectron microscopy of oligodendroglia in severe mental illness.ÌýÌýBrain Res Bull. 2001;55597-Ìý561
87.
Benes ÌýFMÌýMyelination of cortical-hippocampal relays during late adolescence.ÌýÌýSchizophr Bull. 1989;15585-Ìý593
88.
Bilder ÌýRMBogerts ÌýBAshtari ÌýMWu ÌýHAlvir ÌýJMJody ÌýDReiter ÌýGBell ÌýLLieberman ÌýJAÌýAnterior hippocampal volume reductions predict frontal lobe dysfunction in first episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 1995;1747-Ìý58
89.
Copolov ÌýDVelakoulis ÌýDMcGorry ÌýPMallard ÌýCarinaYung ÌýARees ÌýSJackson ÌýGRehn ÌýABrewer ÌýWPantelis ÌýCÌýNeurobiological findings in early phase schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBrain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;31157-Ìý165
90.
Hirayasu ÌýYShenton ÌýMESalisbury ÌýDFDickey ÌýCCFischer ÌýIAMazzoni ÌýPKisler ÌýTArakaki ÌýHKwon ÌýJSAnderson ÌýJEYurgelun-Todd ÌýDTohen ÌýMMcCarley ÌýRWÌýLower left temporal lobe MRI volumes in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with psychotic patients with first-episode affective disorder and normal subjects.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1998;1551384-Ìý1391
91.
Rosen ÌýHJGorno-Tempini ÌýMLGoldman ÌýWPPerry ÌýRJSchuff ÌýNWeiner ÌýMFeiwell ÌýRKramer ÌýJHMiller ÌýBLÌýPatterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia.ÌýÌýNeurology. 2002;58198-Ìý208
92.
Ananth ÌýHPopescu ÌýICritchley ÌýHDGood ÌýCDFrackowiak ÌýRSDolan ÌýRJÌýCortical and subcortical gray matter abnormalities in schizophrenia determined through structural magnetic resonance imaging with optimized volumetric voxel-based morphometry.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2002;1591497-Ìý1505
93.
Thieben ÌýMJDuggins ÌýAJGood ÌýCDGomes ÌýLMahant ÌýNRichards ÌýFMcCusker ÌýEFrackowiak ÌýRSÌýThe distribution of structural neuropathology in pre-clinical Huntington's disease.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2002;125 (pt 8) 1815-Ìý1828
94.
Thompson ÌýPMVidal ÌýCGiedd ÌýJNGochman ÌýPBlumenthal ÌýJNicolson ÌýRToga ÌýAWRapoport ÌýJLÌýMapping adolescent brain change reveals dynamic wave of accelerated gray matter loss in very early-onset schizophrenia.ÌýÌýProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;9811650-Ìý11655
95.
Bookstein ÌýFLÌýVoxel-based morphometry should not be used with imperfectly registered images.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141454-Ìý1462
Original Article
AugustÌý2003

Gray and White Matter Brain Abnormalities in First-Episode Schizophrenia Inferred From Magnetization Transfer Imaging

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neuroinflammation, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, University College London (Drs Bagary, Symms, Barker, and Ron), and Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus (Mr Mutsatsa and Dr Joyce), London, England.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60(8):779-788. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.8.779
Abstract

BackgroundÌý Neuroimaging studies suggest that schizophrenia is associated with gray and possibly white matter changes. It is unclear whether these changes are present at illness onset or which brain structures are selectively affected. New imaging methods such as magnetization transfer imaging may be more sensitive than conventional volumetric imaging to the subtle structural brain changes in schizophrenia.

MethodsÌý High-resolution volumetric T1-weighted images and magnetization transfer images were acquired from 30 patients (29 with first-episode schizophrenia and 1 with schizophreniform psychoses) and 30 control subjects. Images were processed using voxel-based morphometry, which allows whole-brain analysis.

ResultsÌý Compared with controls, the magnetization transfer ratio (an index of signal loss derived from magnetization transfer imaging) was reduced bilaterally in the medial prefrontal cortex (right greater than left), insula (left greater than right), and white matter incorporating the fasciculus uncinatus (left greater than right) in the patient group. Analysis of the T1-weighted images did not reveal significant volumetric differences between patients and controls.

ConclusionsÌý Gray and white matter abnormalities are present in schizophrenia at illness onset. The magnetization transfer ratio is sensitive to these abnormalities, which cannot be explained by detectable atrophy in our patient group.

A RECENT REVIEW1 concluded that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain abnormalities are common in schizophrenia populations. Frequencies of regional changes, expressed as a percentage of studies reviewed, were 100% for volume loss in the superior temporal gyrus, 74% for medial temporal structures, 59% for prefrontal regions, 31% for the cerebellum, and 80% for ventricular enlargement.1 A contemporary meta-analysis2 also reported increased ventricular volume and decreases in medial temporal lobe structures and cerebral volume. Converging evidence from neuroimaging, neuropathological, and neurocognitive studies suggests that abnormalities in frontotemporal, frontostriatal,3-7 and frontothalamic-cerebellar8 pathways may explain many of the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia. It remains uncertain whether structural changes are reversible9 or progressive, at least in some patients,10 and whether different clinical and cognitive phenotypes are associated with distinctive brain abnormalities.

Recently, attention has focused on first-episode schizophrenia, in which detectable brain abnormalities are more likely to reflect the primary disease process, diminishing confounds such as medication exposure and chronicity. In their review, Shenton et al1 concluded that abnormalities described in patients with first-episode schizophrenia were similar to those in chronic schizophrenia populations. Reduced gray matter volume,11,12 increased ventricular volumes,13,14 and temporolimbic abnormalities15,16 are the most commonly reported abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia. Hippocampus volume reduction has been considered one of the most consistent structural abnormalities in schizophrenia, and it may be present at illness onset.17 Perhaps because early structural changes may be subtle and patients with first-episode schizophrenia are more likely to have variable disease outcomes, some such studies have not found significant volumetric abnormalities for ventricles and temporal lobes,18 regional or total hemisphere volumes,19 and the hippocampus or parahippocampal gyrus.20,21 Although high-resolution imaging continues to improve sensitivity with progressively decreasing slice thickness, the limitations of volumetric MRI include lack of neuropathological specificity and poor sensitivity to subtle neuropathological changes that may not culminate in atrophy. In schizophrenia neuroimaging, the enhanced sensitivity and neuropathological specificity of magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) offers considerable advantages.

First described by Wolff and Balaban,22 MTI is based on the interaction of protons bound to macromolecular structures and free protons in tissue water. In brain tissue, the major macromolecules in the bound proton pool are thought to be cell membrane proteins and phospholipids in gray matter and myelin in white matter. Bound protons are preferentially saturated using an off-resonance radiofrequency pulse. Chemical exchange or direct dipolar coupling transfers macromolecular saturation from bound to free protons, causing decreased longitudinal magnetization undetected by conventional MRI because bound protons have short relaxation times in biological tissues. The reduction in signal intensity depends on macromolecular density. The nature of the interaction sites has yet to be fully determined.23 However, creatine-containing compounds seem to be involved in through-space dipolar interactions to a greater extent than glutamine/glutamate, N-acetylaspartate, and lactate, whereas chemical interaction may be more important for the latter.24 The degree of signal loss, measured in percentage units, is the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR).

An MTR reduction correlates with myelin and axonal loss in postmortem tissue from the spinal cord25 and brain26 in multiple sclerosis, experimental allergic encephalitis,27 toxic demyelination,28 wallerian degeneration,29 and experimental brain injury.30 In vivo white matter MTR decreases occur in conditions with myelin or axonal loss, for example, multiple sclerosis,31 central pontine myelinolysis,32 cerebral ischemia,33 systemic lupus,34 human immunodeficiency virus infection,35 and traumatic brain injury.36 Gray matter abnormalities have been studied less extensively, but wallerian degeneration triggered by distant axonal damage and microscopic lesions are thought to explain cortical MTR reductions in multiple sclerosis.37 The first study to use MTI in chronic schizophrenia38 reported widespread cortical MTR reductions indicative of subtle structural abnormalities, which may reflect reported changes in dendritic density.39

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first application of MTI to the investigation of patients with first-episode schizophrenia, whom we compared with healthy volunteers using the MTR, an index of signal loss derived from MTIs. We also acquired high-resolution volumetric images to assess for atrophy. Voxel-based morphometric (VBM) analysis was used to study group differences using both types of imaging because VBM reduces observer bias and allows whole-brain analysis. Our hypothesis was that frontotemporal abnormalities would be detectable by the time patients first present to medical attention. Based on findings in chronic schizophrenia,38 we further predicted that the MTR would be more sensitive to these abnormalities than conventional T1-weighted volumetric imaging.

Methods
Participants

Thirty patients (19 were men and 3 were left-handed) with a mean age of 27.3 years (range, 18-47 years) were examined. The catchment area included deprived inner city and affluent suburban areas of London. Patients were recruited as soon as possible after first presenting to mental health services with schizophreniform psychosis (DSM-IV). Diagnostic criteria were reviewed by 2 experienced clinicians (E.M.J.) 1 year after recruitment to establish a diagnosis of schizophrenia. One patient was lost to follow-up before this diagnostic review. Antipsychotic medications included olanzapine, risperidone, sulpiride, haloperidol, and zuclopenthixol (19 patients used atypical agents, 6 used typical agents, and 5 were unmedicated). Symptom severity was assessed using the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms,40 and the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale.41 We also determined handedness42 and parental social class43 and estimated premorbid IQ using the National Adult Reading Test.44Table 1 summarizes demographic and clinical indices.

Thirty healthy volunteers (18 were men and 2 were left-handed) with a mean age of 28.9 years (range, 21-49 years) were recruited to match the patient group for age, sex, handedness, and estimated premorbid IQ. Controls with a history of neurological or systemic illness, head injury, substance abuse, or alcohol intake greater than 240 g/wk were excluded. Controls with a personal or family history of psychiatric illness were also excluded. Permission to conduct the study was obtained from all relevant research ethics committees. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. A neuroradiologist reviewed the brain MRIs. No gross abnormalities were reported.

Magnetic resonance imaging

Participants underwent MRI using a 1.5-tesla scanner (Signa; GE Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis) with a standard quadrature head coil. Total scanning time (including sequences not reported herein) was 60 minutes. A preliminary sagittal localizing scan was acquired. High-resolution coronal volumetric images were acquired using a 3-dimensional T1-weighted spoiled gradient recalled echo (SPGR) sequence generating 124 contiguous, 1.5-mm coronal slices (echo time, 4.2 milliseconds; repetition time, 15 milliseconds; field of view, 24 cm2; 256 × 192 matrix; and flip angle, 20°). The 1.0 × 1.2 × 1.5-mm acquisition parameters were determined by scan time constraints and were automatically reconstructed by the scanner to a 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.5-mm voxel size. Axial MTIs were acquired using a dual spin-echo–based MTI sequence (echo time, 30/80 milliseconds; repetition time, 1720 milliseconds; 28 contiguous 5-mm axial slices; 256 × 128 pixel image matrix; and field of view, 24 cm2) with and without a saturation pulse (16 milliseconds, 23.2-µT Hamming appodised 3 lobe sinc pulse applied 1 kHz from water resonance). The 1 × 2 × 5-mm MTI acquisition parameters were determined by scan time constraints. The scanner automatically reconstructed images to a 1 × 1 × 5-mm voxel size. The MTI sequence described in detail by Barker et al45 generates proton-density and T2-weighted images along with MT-weighted images. These images are all inherently registered to each other and to the calculated MTR image created from proton-density and MT-weighted images. The MTR is an index of signal loss in percentage units, calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis from the following formula:

MTR = [(Mo − Ms)/Mo] × 100,

where Ms and Mo are mean signal intensities with and without the saturation pulse, respectively. The MTR is not calculated in voxels if values in source images are below the mean background noise level. We used the 30-millisecond echo for MTR calculation because the resulting map has a higher signal-to-noise ratio than that from the 80-millisecond echo. Typical MTR values are 30% to 50% for white matter, 20% to 40% for gray matter, and approaching 0% for cerebrospinal fluid. For our sequence, MTR values were approximately 40% for white matter, 35% for subcortical gray matter, 32% for cortical gray matter, and 2% for cerebrospinal fluid.

Image processing

Data were processed on a computer workstation (Sun Ultra; Sun Microsystems Inc, Santa Clara, Calif) using SPM99 statistical parametric mapping software (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London) and working in an analysis environment (MATLAB; The MathWorks Inc, Natick, Mass), unless otherwise stated.

Spoiled gradient recalled echo

Images were reoriented into axial slices aligned parallel to the anteroposterior commissural axis. The origin was set to the anterior commissure. Images were spatially normalized to the standard T1 template in SPM99, following a method that optimizes segmentation accuracy for VBM described by Good et al.46 Affine registration (12 nonlinear iterations, medium nonlinear regularization, resliced to 2 × 2 × 2-mm voxels) produced isotropic voxels of higher signal-to-noise ratio than the original images. The images were flipped to neurological space and then segmented using image intensity nonuniformity correction. A mixture model cluster analysis identifies voxel intensities matching tissue types (gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid) combined with a priori knowledge of the spatial distribution of these tissues derived from probability maps.47 Gray and white matter segments were extracted to remove nonbrain voxels and then underwent nonlinear normalization to the gray-and-white image template in SPM99 using 7 × 8 × 7 basis functions, 12 nonlinear iterations, and medium nonlinear regularization. The resulting images were segmented, producing gray matter, white matter, and cerebrospinal fluid tissue maps in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space having excluded nonbrain voxels. Optimized methods, as described by Good et al,46 were used to incorporate information from the deformation fields using a modulation step to preserve within-voxel volumes that may have been altered during nonlinear normalization. Voxel values in segmented images were multiplied by Jacobian determinants, derived from spatial normalization, to provide intensity correction for the induced regional volumetric changes. Analysis of modulated data tests for regional differences in absolute tissue volume. Unmodulated data analysis is a complementary test for regional differences in tissue concentration per unit volume based on differences in image intensity.46-48

Magnetization transfer ratio

Axial images were acquired parallel to the anteroposterior commissural axis. Spatial normalization involved registration of the T2-weighted images, which are implicitly registered (from acquisition) to the MTR images, into standard space. This inherent coregistration of an MTR image and a T2-weighted image allows us to apply registration parameters determined from T2-weighted images (whose contrast matches the MNI template) to MTR images (for which no template is available). The registration used a modified algorithm for 3-dimensional alignment of positron emission tomographic images, relying on anatomic information to align 2 images by calculating the least squares difference of the 2 images on a voxel-by-voxel basis and iteratively moving the images relative to one another to minimize this cost function.49,50 The T2-weighted images were registered to the MNI T2-weighted average brain in SPM99 using affine 12-parameter, 3-dimensional linear transformations through a 2-stage process. For each participant, a transformation was first found between the T2-weighted image and the MNI T2-weighted average brain, retaining all tissue within the image (brain parenchyma, skull, scalp muscle and fat, and other extracranial tissue). Although reasonably robust, the registration is potentially susceptible to motion artifacts of brain relative to surrounding tissue. To overcome this, the inverse of the transformation found was applied to a version of the MNI T2-weighted average brain from which the skull had been removed. This transformed the skull-stripped MNI template to the native image space of the particular participant, allowing it to be used as a mask to remove nonbrain tissue from the individual participant's T2-weighted image. Each skull-stripped T2-weighted image thus created was then registered to the skull-stripped T2-weighted MNI atlas, transforming it into MNI space. As mask and T2-weighted images have now been skull stripped, this second registration is much more robust. This final transformation was then applied to the participant's MTR image, mapping it into MNI space. Nonbrain features were removed by masking with the skull-stripped T2-weighted MNI average brain. Thus, MTR images were normalized to MNI space but were not subjected to warping or segmentation. Resolution of voxel size of 1 × 1 × 5 mm was maintained for MTR images because, unlike SPGR data, resampling 1 × 1 × 5-mm MTR images to a 2 × 2 × 2-mm isotropic voxel size would have produced only a small increase in signal-to-noise ratio. To determine whether MTR changes were in gray or white matter, we overlaid MTR decreases in patients onto thresholded a priori gray and white matter probability maps provided with SPM99 using the "write filtered" function. A threshold of 16384 (50% of 32768, the intensity representing a probability of 1 in the images) on the white matter map was chosen to identify areas having a greater than 50% probability of being in white matter rather than gray matter.38

Smoothing

Taking account of voxel size and the size of structures within which abnormalities were predicted, images were smoothed to 15 mm (MTR) and 12 mm (SPGR) using a full-width–half-maximum Gaussian filter to improve the signal-to-noise ratio, allow for intersubject anatomical variability, and render the data more normally distributed by the central limit theorem. The probability distributions used in SPM99 for voxel and cluster analysis are approximations, which are valid within certain limits, especially with respect to smoothness and number of images. Low smoothing (full-width–half-maximum <3 times voxel size) with low df can cause aberrant voxel-level results. Consequently, smoothing of 3 times voxel size is recommended.51,52 Accordingly, we selected 15-mm full-width–half-maximum smoothing for MTR (3 times voxel size). This relatively high degree of smoothing also helped overcome problems due to the multislice nature of the MTR, which reduced the accuracy of data reconstruction in the slice direction during normalization. For SPGR data, we selected 12-mm full-width–half-maximum smoothing, the spatial scale at which the analysis is most sensitive to differences in regional gray matter. This spatial scale also allows comparison with previous SPM99 voxel-based studies in chronic schizophrenia.53-55 Each voxel in the smoothed data represents a locally weighted average intensity from a region of surrounding voxels defined by the size of the smoothing kernel.

Statistical analysis

Group comparisons for MTR (whole brain) and SPGR (both gray matter and white matter maps) between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and controls were performed based on the general linear model and the theory of Gaussian random fields56 using 2-sample t tests to compare populations with 1 scan per participant. Thresholds for MTR and SPGR data were set at 40% of mean image intensity to minimize low signal-to-noise voxels. Only voxels exceeding this intensity threshold(40% of mean image intensity) were included in the analyses. As calculation of mean intensity includes all the (very-low-intensity) pixels outside the head, the cutoff value of 40% of this value should not exclude any pixels that are fully brain tissue. This procedure excluded noise areas outside the brain or in the ventricles. Proportional scaling was used to normalize image intensity in SPGR gray and white matter maps. Using 2 contrasts, the analysis detected whether each voxel had a greater or lesser probability of change, that is, a reduction or increase in the parameter of interest in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with controls. The resulting set of voxel values for each contrast constitutes a statistical parametric map of the t statistic.

This study was a structural VBM analysis, and, consequently, we selected a study threshold of t>3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected). Statistical parametric mapping was originally designed to analyze functional data, and correction for multiple comparisons can be considered overly conservative when applied to structural data.57 We validated our analysis parameters by dividing the control subjects into 2 subgroups matched for age, handedness, and sex. At the threshold of t>3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected), there were no voxel-level differences in the MTR or SPGR (gray and white matter) between the 2 subgroups of controls, suggesting that this threshold minimizes false positives.

We also report cluster-level statistics for the MTR. Data histograms in a large single-slice region of interest (ROI) incorporating gray and white matter resembled a Gaussian distribution. This satisfies suggested criteria for using cluster size to assess significance in SPM99, considered appropriate only if data are normally distributed.47 This was not the case for SPGR segmented gray and white matter data. Consequently, we used only voxel-level thresholds for SPGR analysis.

Results

There were no differences for age (t = 0.96; P = .34), sex (z = 0.81; P = .42), handedness (z = 0.46; P = .64), National Adult Reading Test premorbid IQ (t = 1.17; P = .27), or paternal social class (z = 0.86; P = .39) between patients with first-episode schizophrenia and controls using t tests for continuous variables and Mann-Whitney tests for categorical variables (Table 1).

Spgr group differences

Neither modulated (optimized) nor unmodulated (standard) SPGR T1-weighted gray matter and white matter maps revealed any significant differences between patients and controls for voxel-level statistics at a threshold of t = 3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected). Thus, regional atrophy was not detected because we did not demonstrate any significant regional differences in absolute tissue volume or tissue concentration per unit of volume of gray or white matter in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with matched controls.

Mtr group differences

At the study statistical threshold of t>3.24(P<.001, uncorrected), the MTR was reduced bilaterally in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with controls in the insula and adjacent white matter incorporating the fasciculus uncinatus, the right anteromedial frontal lobe extending into the anterior cingulate bilaterally, the right inferior and superior temporal gyrus, the left precuneus, and the left cerebellum (Figure 1, Figure 2, and Figure 3 and Table 2). Using the segmented white matter map, we ascertained that the MTR decreases were predominantly cortical, extending into white matter adjacent to the insula, encompassing the fasciculus uncinatus. To exclude the possibility that these were chance findings (type I error), a further analysis was undertaken correcting for multiple comparisons using Gaussian random fields (t>4.61; P<.05, corrected). Reductions in the MTR in the right medial prefrontal cortex, left insular cortex, and left fasciculus uncinatus survived this correction(Table 2). No MTR increases were observed in patients compared with controls at a threshold of t>3.24 (P<.001, uncorrected).

We conducted a post hoc validation study to confirm the SPM99 findings using ROI methods in native-space MTR images. Rectangular ROIs (37.9 mm2) were placed in the medial prefrontal cortex and insula using a standardized protocol in a sample of 8 male, right-handed patients with first-episode schizophrenia and age-, handedness-, and sex-matched controls using DispImage59 software. Axial proton-density slices were used to identify the lowest slice in which the head of the caudate was visible. Bilateral ROIs were placed in the medial prefrontal cortex, adjacent to the interhemispheric fissure, midway between the frontal pole and the anterior margin of the head of the caudate. Similarly, bilateral ROIs were also placed in the long gyrus of the insula in the adjacent slice. Proton-density images were coregistered to MTR images during acquisition, as previously described. The ROIs were automatically transferred to the coregistered MTR image using DispImage. Care was taken to avoid partial volume effects. The ROIs were placed masked to participant identity. Decreased MTRs were found using Mann-Whitney tests in the right prefrontal cortex and insula (bilaterally) that are consistent with the SPM99 analysis (Table 3).

Comment

The results of this study suggest that frontotemporal MTR abnormalities involving cortex and white matter are already present at the first episode of schizophrenia. The neuropathological basis for cortical MTR changes remains to be determined, but a variety of abnormalities could cause MTR reductions by decreasing the bound proton pool. Although creatine, choline, and N-acetylaspartate–related compounds are thought to contribute, the specific molecules responsible for the MTI signal in gray matter are yet to be specified. However, the MTI signal depends on macromolecular density, that is, mainly cell membrane proteins and phospholipids in gray matter and myelin in white matter. Reductions in the MTR in gray matter are likely to be related to decreased cell number, cell size, or dendritic density or may reflect abnormal cell membrane structure. White matter MTR reductions are likely to be related to abnormalities in myelin or reduced axonal density.

The anteromedial prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia has received little attention, although results of animal studies60 suggest that it may be relevant. Voxel-based studies in chronic schizophrenia have demonstrated anteromedial prefrontal cortex gray matter reductions in some55,61,62 but not all54 of a small number of studies. Region of interest studies have been complicated by methodological differences, with few studies evaluating frontal lobe subregions. In a study63 of patients with chronic schizophrenia and neocortex segmented into 48 topographic regions, the greatest volumetric reductions were in medial and orbitoprefrontal cortices, anterior cingulate gyrus, paracingulate gyrus, and insula. Anterior prefrontal cortex has been associated with monitoring of self-generated information and selection of appropriate executive processes, playing a central role in mediating dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortical interaction.64 Impairment in anteromedial prefrontal regions may contribute to some of the cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

The anterior cingulate may be relevant to several psychiatric disorders having connections with the hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, and amygdala. In schizophrenia, abnormalities in the anterior cingulate include increased glutamatergic axons,65 axospinous synapses,66 decreased inhibitory interneurons,67 and projection neuron loss in deeper laminae.68 Anterior cingulate volume reductions have been reported in first-episode16 and chronic61,63 schizophrenia. Functional imaging data suggest that anterior cingulate cortex may be essential for the internal monitoring necessary to engage top-down attentional processes in adapting to a changing environment.69,70 Disruption of cingulate-striate circuits has been associated with apathy and a lack of drive,71 characteristic negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Recent studies have found decreased insular volume in first-episode16 and chronic54,61 schizophrenia. Functional imaging studies72,73 have reported reduced cerebral blood flow in insular cortex during verbal fluency and recognition memory tasks. The insula may also have a pivotal role in cognitive and emotional processes, permitting the internal representation of external events,74,75 and in the differentiation of internally and externally generated sensory stimuli.76 Impairment of these processes may mediate some perceptual disturbances in schizophrenia.

Abnormalities in the fasciculus uncinatus replicate findings from a recent study61 of patients with schizophrenia and predominantly negative symptoms. The fasciculus uncinatus is a bundle of association fibers connecting orbitofrontal, superofrontal, and middle frontal gyri with anterior temporal lobe cortex, and it may play an important role in schizophrenia. It contains the lateral cholinergic pathway originating in the nucleus basalis of Meynert and innervates frontal, parietal, and temporal neocortex.77 Cortical cholinergic pathways are important mediators in processing information essential for cognition.78 Fasciculus uncinatus abnormalities may explain the reduced postsynaptic prefrontal muscarinic receptor binding recently reported in schizophrenia.79 Right frontotemporal disconnection after injury to the right ventral frontal lobe and underlying fasciculus uncinatus leads to impaired awareness of self over time, which is integral to the formulation and implementation of future goals.80

White matter abnormalities may be relevant in schizophrenia. Schizophrenialike symptoms occur in metachromatic leukodystrophy,81 and recent diffusion imaging studies have reported reduced anisotropy in prefrontal white matter82,83 and corpus callosum,84 suggesting myelin or axonal abnormalities. Differential expression of myelination-related genes in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex,85 apoptosis, and necrosis of oligodendroglial cells and damaged myelin sheaths in prefrontal cortex and caudate nucleus have been reported in schizophrenia.86 Myelination of frontotemporal connections continues into early adulthood.87 Delayed or abnormal frontotemporal myelination in schizophrenia could explain the onset of symptoms in early adulthood.

We did not demonstrate atrophy. Our volumetric findings are contrary to those of some studies demonstrating decreases in medial temporal lobe structures, particularly the hippocampus,17,88,89 superior temporal gyrus,90 insula,16 and prefrontal cortex54 in first-episode schizophrenia. This may reflect the heterogeneity of first-episode schizophrenia populations, which include patients with variable disease outcomes. However, there is considerable variance in image intensity in small medial temporal lobe structures, and some subcortical gray matter structures have image intensities similar to white matter, increasing risk of tissue misclassification during segmentation in these regions. Partial volume effects may have contributed, as the model assumes that all voxels contain only 1 tissue type, and those containing more than 1 may be modeled incorrectly. Accordingly, ROI methods may be more sensitive in such subcortical structures. These methodological problems, however, are unlikely to account for our findings for several reasons. First, the normalization and segmentation procedures used in SPM99 have been considered robust and accurate for volumetric T1-weighted images.47 Second, gray matter losses have been reported in cortical and subcortical gray matter in patients with chronic schizophrenia and other conditions using similar analysis methods.38,55,91-93 Third, we excluded nonbrain voxels and used a modulation step that allows comparison of absolute amounts of gray matter. Finally, despite normal findings in volumetric imaging, MTR abnormalities were detected in regions where volumetric deficits have been reported in chronic and first-episode studies.

The discrepancy between circumscribed MTR abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia reported herein and the more widespread abnormalities previously reported in chronic schizophrenia by Foong et al38 deserve comment. There are 2 possible explanations. The first assumes that any brain abnormalities in schizophrenia are static and that widespread cortical abnormalities occur only in those with severe, chronic disease. If this model is correct, a much larger sample of patients with first-episode schizophrenia than is reported herein would be required to ensure that sufficient numbers of patients destined to have severe chronic illness were included. The alternative is that brain abnormalities are progressive, at least in some patients, and that cortical abnormalities spread as disease becomes chronic. Support for this explanation accrues from the longitudinal study of Thompson et al94 reporting progressive gray matter loss extending from parietal regions to include temporal, dorsolateral prefrontal, and frontal eyefield cortices in a small sample with childhood-onset schizophrenia. Longitudinal studies are ongoing to determine whether the abnormalities we reported are progressive and the relationship to illness course and treatment response.

Several limitations of this study should be mentioned. There are potential limitations in the use of VBM that have been discussed in detail elsewhere.46-48,95 Data on MTRs could be prone to partial volume effects due to the 5-mm slices. However, we did not segment or warp the MTR data, which minimizes the risk of tissue misclassification. In addition, our post hoc native-space MTR ROI analysis was consistent with the SPM99 analysis. We reported cluster and voxel analyses for MTR data. Histograms of our data samples incorporating gray and white matter on a given slice resembled a Gaussian distribution, as previously demonstrated in chronic schizophrenia in reporting cluster analysis.38 The use of cluster size to assess significance in SPM is appropriate only if the data are normally distributed.47 It is possible that the MTR signal may not be normally distributed locally. A permutation analysis may be more reliable for cluster analysis in future studies. Most patients were receiving neuroleptic agents, and it could be argued that our findings may be different in a drug-naive population. However, there is little evidence from neuropathological studies, conducted mainly in animals, to suggest that neuroleptic medication causes or exacerbates brain abnormalities in schizophrenia,7 and most of our patients were receiving atypical neuroleptic agents for short periods, making this even less likely. Nonetheless, the effects of neuroleptic medication use on MTRs have not been studied and could be a potential confound. We repeated our analysis excluding the 5 unmedicated patients. Decreases in MTRs were found in the same regions. We did not analyze unmedicated patients separately because the sample size would have insufficient df to produce meaningful results. Our sample was relatively small, and it may not be possible to generalize our findings to other first-episode schizophrenia populations.

Corresponding author and reprints: Manny S. Bagary, MRCPsych, Box 15, Section of Neuropsychiatry and NMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG England (e-mail: m.bagary@ion.ucl.ac.uk).

Submitted for publication April 2, 2002; final revision received February 6, 2003; accepted February 7, 2003.

This study was supported by a grant from the Wellcome Trust, London.

We thank the members of the NMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, University College London, for their assistance, and we thank all the patients and volunteers who participated in the study.

References
1.
Shenton ÌýMEDickey ÌýCCFrumin ÌýMMcCarley ÌýRWÌýA review of MRI findings in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2001;491-Ìý52
2.
Wright ÌýICRabe-Hesketh ÌýSWoodruff ÌýPWRDavid ÌýASMurray ÌýRMBullmore ÌýETÌýMeta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2000;15716-Ìý25
3.
Wright ÌýICSharma ÌýTEllison ÌýZRMcGuire ÌýPKFriston ÌýKJBrammer ÌýMJMurray ÌýRMBullmore ÌýETÌýSupra-regional brain systems and the neuropathology of schizophrenia.ÌýÌýCereb Cortex. 1999;9366-Ìý378
4.
Robbins ÌýTÌýThe case for fronto-striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Bull. 1990;16391-Ìý401
5.
Buchsbaum ÌýMSHaier ÌýRJPotkin ÌýSGNuechterlein ÌýKBracha ÌýHSKatz ÌýMLohr ÌýJWu ÌýJLottenberg ÌýSJerabek ÌýPAÌýFrontostriatal disorder of cerebral metabolism in never-medicated schizophrenics.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49935-Ìý942
6.
Friston ÌýKJFrith ÌýCDÌýSchizophrenia: a disconnection syndrome?ÌýÌýClin Neurosci. 1995;389-Ìý97
7.
Harrison ÌýPÌýThe neuropathology of schizophrenia: a critical review of the data and their interpretation.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1999;122 (pt 4) 593-Ìý624
8.
Andreason ÌýNCArndt ÌýSSwayze ÌýVCizado ÌýTFlaum ÌýMO'Leary ÌýDEhardt ÌýJCYuh ÌýWTÌýThalamic abnormalities in schizophrenia visualized through magnetic resonance image averaging.ÌýÌý³§³¦¾±±ð²Ô³¦±ð. 1994;266294-Ìý298Google Scholar
9.
Puri ÌýBKHutton ÌýSBSaeed ÌýNOatridge ÌýAHajnal ÌýJVDuncan ÌýLChapman ÌýMJBarnes ÌýTRBydder ÌýGMJoyce ÌýEMÌýA serial longitudinal quantitative MRI study of cerebral changes in first-episode schizophrenia using image segmentation and subvoxel registration.ÌýÌýPsychiatry Res. 2001;106141-Ìý150
10.
DeLisi ÌýLETew ÌýWXie ÌýSHoff ÌýALSakuma ÌýMKushner ÌýMLee ÌýGShedlack ÌýKSmith ÌýAMGrimson ÌýRÌýA prospective follow-up study of brain morphology and cognition in first episode schizophrenic patients: preliminary findings.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1995;38349-Ìý360
11.
Lim ÌýKOTew ÌýWKushner ÌýMChow ÌýKMatsumoto ÌýBDeLisi ÌýLEÌýCortical gray matter volume deficit in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1996;1531548-Ìý1553
12.
Zipursky ÌýRBLambe ÌýEKKapur ÌýSKMikulis ÌýDJÌýCerebral gray matter volume deficits in first-episode psychosis.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55540-Ìý546
13.
Lieberman ÌýJAJody ÌýDAlvir ÌýJMAshtari ÌýMLevy ÌýDLBogerts ÌýBDegreef ÌýGMayerhoff ÌýDICooper ÌýTÌýBrain morphology, dopamine, and eye-tracking abnormalities in first-episode schizophrenia: prevalence and clinical correlates.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50357-Ìý368
14.
Barr ÌýWBAshtari ÌýMBilder ÌýMDegreef ÌýGLieberman ÌýJÌýBrain morphometric comparison of first-episode schizophrenia and temporal lobe epilepsy.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 1997;170515-Ìý519
15.
Gur ÌýRETuretsky ÌýBICowell ÌýPEFinkelman ÌýCMaany ÌýVGrossman ÌýRIArnold ÌýSEBilker ÌýWBGur ÌýRCÌýTemporolimbic volume reductions in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57769-Ìý775
16.
Crespo-Facorro ÌýBKim ÌýJAndreasen ÌýNCO'Leary ÌýDSBockholt ÌýHJMagnotta ÌýVÌýInsular cortex abnormalities in schizophrenia: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study of first-episode patients.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2000;4635-Ìý43Google Scholar
17.
Heckers ÌýSÌýNeuroimaging studies of the hippocampus in schizophrenia.ÌýÌý±á¾±±è±è´Ç³¦²¹³¾±è³Ü²õ. 2001;11520-Ìý528
18.
DeLisi ÌýLEStritzke ÌýPRiordan ÌýHHolan ÌýVBoccio ÌýAKushner ÌýMMcClelland ÌýJVan Eyl ÌýOAnand ÌýAÌýThe timing of brain morphological changes in schizophrenia and their relationship to clinical outcome.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1992;31241-Ìý254
19.
Bilder ÌýRMWu ÌýHBogerts ÌýBDegreef ÌýGAshtari ÌýMAlvir ÌýJMSnyder ÌýPJLieberman ÌýJAÌýAbsence of regional hemispheric volume asymmetries in first-episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1994;1511437-Ìý1447
20.
Razi ÌýKGreene ÌýKPSakuma ÌýMGe ÌýSKushner ÌýMDeLisi ÌýLEÌýReduction of the parahippocampal gyrus and the hippocampus in patients with chronic schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBr J Psychiatry. 1999;174512-Ìý519
21.
Laakso ÌýMPTiihonen ÌýJSyvalahti ÌýEVilkman ÌýHLaakso ÌýAAlakare ÌýBRakkolainen ÌýVSalokangas ÌýRKKoivisto ÌýEHietala ÌýJÌýA morphometric MRI study of the hippocampus in first-episode, neuroleptic-naive schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 2001;503-Ìý7
22.
Wolff ÌýSDBalaban ÌýRSÌýMagnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and tissue water proton relaxation in vivo.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Med. 1989;10135-Ìý144
23.
Henkelman ÌýRMStanisz ÌýGJGraham ÌýSJÌýMagnetization transfer in MRI: a review.ÌýÌýNMR Biomed. 2001;1457-Ìý64
24.
Meyerhoff ÌýDJÌýProton magnetization transfer of metabolites in human brain.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Med. 1999;42417-Ìý420
25.
Mottershead ÌýJPThornton ÌýJSClemence ÌýMScaravilli ÌýFNewcombe ÌýJCuzner ÌýMLBarker ÌýGJTofts ÌýPSParker ÌýGJMOrdidge ÌýRJMiller ÌýDHMcDonald ÌýWIÌýCorrelation of spinal cord axonal density with post mortem NMR measurements in multiple sclerosis and controls [abstract].ÌýÌýProc Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 1998;6T2163
26.
van Waesberghe ÌýJHKamphorst ÌýWDe Groot ÌýCJvan Walderveen ÌýMACastelijns ÌýJARavid ÌýRLycklama a Nijeholt ÌýGJvan der Valk ÌýPPolman ÌýCHThompson ÌýAJBarkhof ÌýFÌýAxonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability.ÌýÌýAnn Neurol. 1999;46747-Ìý754
27.
Dousset ÌýVGrossman ÌýRIRamer ÌýKNSchnall ÌýMDYoung ÌýLHGonzalez-Scarano ÌýFLavi ÌýECohen ÌýJAÌýExperimental allergic encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis: lesion characterization with magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 1992;182483-Ìý491
28.
Deloire-Grassin ÌýMSBrochet ÌýBQuesson ÌýBDelalande ÌýCDousset ÌýVCanioni ÌýPPetry ÌýKGÌýIn vivo evaluation of remyelination in rat brain by magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Sci. 2000;17810-Ìý16
29.
Lexa ÌýFJGrossman ÌýRIRosenquist ÌýACÌýMR of wallerian degeneration in the feline visual system: characterization by magnetization transfer rate with histopathologic correlation.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15201-Ìý212
30.
Kimura ÌýHMeaney ÌýDFMcGowan ÌýJCGrossman ÌýRILenkinski ÌýRERoss ÌýDTMcIntosh ÌýTKGennarelli ÌýTASmith ÌýDHÌýMagnetization transfer imaging of diffuse axonal injury following experimental brain injury in the pig: characterization by magnetization transfer ratio with histopathologic correlation.ÌýÌýJ Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20540-Ìý546
31.
Gass ÌýABarker ÌýGJKidd ÌýDThorpe ÌýJWMacManus ÌýDBrennan ÌýATofts ÌýPSThompson ÌýAJMcDonald ÌýWIMiller ÌýDHÌýCorrelation of magnetization transfer ratio and clinical disability in multiple sclerosis.ÌýÌýAnn Neurol. 1994;3662-Ìý67
32.
Silver ÌýNCBarker ÌýGJMacManus ÌýDCThorpe ÌýJWHoward ÌýRMiller ÌýDHÌýDecreased magnetization transfer ratio due to demyelination: a case of central pontine myelinolysis.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61208-Ìý209
33.
Kado ÌýHKimura ÌýHTsuchida ÌýTYonekura ÌýYTokime ÌýTTokuriki ÌýYItoh ÌýHÌýAbnormal magnetization transfer ratios in normal-appearing white matter on conventional MR images of patients with occlusive cerebrovascular disease.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22922-Ìý927
34.
Bosma ÌýGPRood ÌýMJZwinderman ÌýAHHuizinga ÌýTWvan Buchem ÌýMAÌýEvidence of central nervous system damage in patients with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus, demonstrated by magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýArthritis Rheum. 2000;4348-Ìý54
35.
Ernst ÌýTChang ÌýLWitt ÌýMWalot ÌýIAronow ÌýHLeonido-Yee ÌýMSinger ÌýEÌýProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and human immunodeficiency virus–associated white matter lesions in AIDS: magnetization transfer MR imaging.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 1999;210539-Ìý543
36.
Sinson ÌýGBagley ÌýLJCecil ÌýKMTorchia ÌýMMcGowan ÌýJCLenkinski ÌýREMcIntosh ÌýTKGrossman ÌýRIÌýMagnetization transfer imaging and proton MR spectroscopy in the evaluation of axonal injury: correlation with clinical outcome after traumatic brain injury.ÌýÌýAJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22143-Ìý151
37.
Cercignani ÌýMBozzali ÌýMIannucci ÌýGComi ÌýGFilippi ÌýMÌýMagnetization transfer ratio and mean diffusivity of normal appearing white and gray matter from patients with multiple sclerosis.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70311-Ìý317
38.
Foong ÌýJSymms ÌýMRBarker ÌýGJMaier ÌýMWoermann ÌýFGMiller ÌýDHRon ÌýMAÌýNeuropathological abnormalities in schizophrenia: evidence from magnetization transfer imaging.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;124882-Ìý892
39.
Selemon ÌýLDGoldman-Rakic ÌýPSÌýThe reduced neuropil hypothesis: a circuit based model of schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 1999;4517-Ìý25
40.
Andreason ÌýNÌýMethods for assessing positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia: positive and negative symptoms and syndromes.ÌýAndreason ÌýNed.ÌýModern Problems in Pharmacopsychiatry. 24 Basel, Switzerland S Karger AG1990;73-Ìý85
41.
Asberg ÌýMMontgomery ÌýSAPerris ÌýCSchalling ÌýDSedvall ÌýGÌýA comprehensive psychopathological rating scale.ÌýÌýActa Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1978;2715-Ìý27
42.
Annett ÌýMAÌýA classification of hand preference by association analysis.ÌýÌýBr J Psychol. 1970;61303-Ìý321
43.
Goldthorpe ÌýJHHope ÌýKÌýThe Social Grading of Occupations: A New Approach and Scale.Ìý Oxford, England Clarendon Press1974;
44.
Nelson ÌýHWillison ÌýJÌýThe National Adult Reading Test (NART).Ìý2nd Windsor, England NFER-Nelson1991;
45.
Barker ÌýGJTofts ÌýPSGass ÌýAÌýAn interleaved sequence for accurate and reproducible clinical measurement of magnetization transfer ratio.ÌýÌýMagn Reson Imaging. 1996;14403-Ìý411
46.
Good ÌýCDJohnsrude ÌýISAshburner ÌýJHenson ÌýRNFriston ÌýKJFrackowiak ÌýRSÌýA voxel-based morphometric study of ageing in 465 normal adult human brains.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;14 (pt 1) 21-Ìý36
47.
Ashburner ÌýJFriston ÌýKJÌýVoxel based morphometry: the methods.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2000;11805-Ìý821
48.
Ashburner ÌýJFriston ÌýKJÌýWhy voxel-based morphometry should be used.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141238-Ìý1243
49.
Symms ÌýMBarker ÌýGHolmes ÌýAÌýA rapid automated system for detection of serial changes in transient ischaemic attack using registration and subtraction of three dimensional images[abstract].ÌýÌýProc Int Soc Magn Reons Med. 1997;5584
50.
Woods ÌýRCherry ÌýSMazziotta ÌýJÌýRapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images.ÌýÌýJ Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;16620-Ìý633
51.
Friston ÌýKJHolmes ÌýAPoline ÌýJBPrice ÌýCJFrith ÌýCDÌýDetecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1996;4 (pt 1) 223-Ìý235
52.
Stoeckael ÌýJPoline ÌýJBMalandain ÌýGAyache ÌýNDarcourt ÌýJÌýSmoothness and degrees of freedom restrictions when using SPM99 [abstract].ÌýÌýHum Brain Mapp. 2001;14suppl11365
53.
Wright ÌýICMcGuire ÌýPKPoline ÌýJBTravere ÌýJMMurray ÌýRMFrith ÌýCDFrackowiak ÌýRSFriston ÌýKJÌýA voxel-based method for the statistical analysis of gray and white matter density applied to schizophrenia.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1995;2244-Ìý252
54.
Wright ÌýICEllison ÌýZRSharma ÌýTFriston ÌýKJMurray ÌýRMMcGuire ÌýPKÌýMapping of gray matter changes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 1999;351-Ìý14
55.
Wilke ÌýMKaufmann ÌýCGrabner ÌýAPutz ÌýBWetter ÌýTCAuer ÌýDPÌýGray matter changes and correlates of disease severity in schizophrenia: a statistical parametric mapping study.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;13814-Ìý824
56.
Poline ÌýJBWorsley ÌýKJEvans ÌýACFriston ÌýKJÌýCombining spatial extent and peak intensity to test for activations in functional imaging.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1997;583-Ìý96
57.
Sowell ÌýERThompson ÌýPMHolmes ÌýCJBatth ÌýRJernigan ÌýTLToga ÌýAWÌýLocalizing age-related changes in brain structure between childhood and adolescence using statistical parametric mapping.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 1999;9 (pt 1) 587-Ìý597
58.
Talairach ÌýJTournoux ÌýPÌýCo-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain.Ìý New York, NY Thieme Medical Publisher1988;
59.
Plummer ÌýDLÌýDispImage: a display and analysis tool for medical images.ÌýÌýRiv Neuroradiol. 1992;5489-Ìý495
60.
Yee ÌýBKÌýCytotoxic lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex abolishes the partial reinforcement extinction effect, attenuates prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex and induces transient hyperlocomotion, while sparing spontaneous object recognition memory in the rat.ÌýÌýNeuroscience. 2000;95675-Ìý689
61.
Sigmundsson ÌýTSuckling ÌýJMaier ÌýMWilliams ÌýSBullmore ÌýEGreenwood ÌýKFukuda ÌýRRon ÌýMToone ÌýBÌýStructural abnormalities in frontal, temporal and limbic regions and interconnecting white matter tracts in schizophrenic patients with prominent negative symptoms.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2001;158234-Ìý243
62.
Hulshoff Pol ÌýHESchnack ÌýHGMandl ÌýRCvan Haren ÌýNEKoning ÌýHCollins ÌýDLEvans ÌýACKahn ÌýRSÌýFocal gray matter density changes in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;581118-Ìý1125
63.
Goldstein ÌýJMGoodman ÌýJMSeidman ÌýLJKennedy ÌýDNMakris ÌýNLee ÌýHTourville ÌýICaviness ÌýVSFaraone ÌýSVTsuang ÌýMTÌýCortical abnormalities in schizophrenia identified by structural magnetic resonance imaging.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56537-Ìý547
64.
Fletcher ÌýPCHenson ÌýRNÌýFrontal lobes and human memory: insights from functional neuroimaging.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;124 (pt 5) 849-Ìý881
65.
Benes ÌýFMVincent ÌýSLAlsterberg ÌýGBird ÌýEDSanGiovanni ÌýJPÌýIncreased GABAA receptor binding in superficial layers of cingulate cortex in schizophrenics.ÌýÌýJ Neurosci. 1992;12924-Ìý929
66.
Aganova ÌýEAUranova ÌýNAÌýMorphometric analysis of synaptic contacts in the anterior limbic cortex in the endogenous psychoses.ÌýÌýNeurosci Behav Physiol. 1992;2259-Ìý65
67.
Benes ÌýFMMcSparren ÌýJBird ÌýEDSanGiovanni ÌýJPVincent ÌýSLÌýDeficits in small interneurons in prefrontal and cingulate cortices of schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48996-Ìý1001
68.
Benes ÌýFMVincent ÌýSLTodtenkopf ÌýMÌýThe density of pyramidal and nonpyramidal neurons in anterior cingulate cortex of schizophrenic and bipolar subjects.ÌýÌýBiol Psychiatry. 2001;50395-Ìý406
69.
Bunge ÌýSAOchsner ÌýKNDesmond ÌýJEGlover ÌýGHGabrieli ÌýJDÌýPrefrontal regions involved in keeping information in and out of mind.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2001;1242074-Ìý2086
70.
van Veen ÌýVCohen ÌýJDBotvinick ÌýMMStenger ÌýVACarter ÌýCSÌýAnterior cingulate cortex, conflict monitoring, and levels of processing.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141302-Ìý1308
71.
Cummings ÌýJLÌýFrontal-subcortical circuits and human behaviour.ÌýÌýArch Neurol. 1993;50873-Ìý878
72.
Curtis ÌýVABullmore ÌýETBrammer ÌýMIWrigth ÌýICWilliams ÌýSCMorris ÌýRGSharma ÌýTSMurray ÌýRMMcGuire ÌýPKÌýAttenuated frontal activation during verbal fluency tasks in patients with schizophrenia.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1998;1551056-Ìý1063
73.
Crespo-Facorro ÌýBWiser ÌýAKAndreasen ÌýNCO'Leary ÌýDSWatkins ÌýGLPonto ÌýLLHichwa ÌýRDÌýNeural basis of novel and well-learned recognition memory in schizophrenia: a positron emission tomography study.ÌýÌýHum Brain Mapp. 2001;12219-Ìý231Google Scholar
74.
Augustine ÌýJRÌýCircuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans.ÌýÌýBrain Res Brain Res Rev. 1996;22229-Ìý244
75.
Cancelliere ÌýAEKertesz ÌýAÌýLesion localisation in acquired deficits of emotional expression and comprehension.ÌýÌýBrain Cogn. 1990;13133-Ìý147
76.
Mesulam ÌýMMufson ÌýEÌýInsula of the Old World monkey, II: efferent cortical output and comments on function.ÌýÌýJ Comp Neurol. 1982;21238-Ìý52
77.
Selden ÌýNRGitelman ÌýDRSalamon-Murayama ÌýNParrish ÌýTBMesulam ÌýMMÌýTrajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1998;121 (pt 12) 2249-Ìý2257
78.
Mesulam ÌýMMÌýBehavioral neuroanatomy of cholinergic innervation in the primate cerebral cortex.ÌýÌýEXS. 1989;571-Ìý11
79.
Crook ÌýJMTomaskovic-Crook ÌýECopolov ÌýDLDean ÌýBÌýLow muscarinic receptor binding in prefrontal cortex from subjects with schizophrenia: a study of Brodmann's areas 8, 9, 10, and 46 and the effects of neuroleptic drug treatment.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2001;158918-Ìý925
80.
Levine ÌýBBlack ÌýSECabeza ÌýRSinden ÌýMMcintosh ÌýARToth ÌýJPTulving ÌýEStuss ÌýDTÌýEpisodic memory and the self in a case of isolated retrograde amnesia.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 1998;121 (pt 10) 1951-Ìý1973
81.
Hyde ÌýTMZiegler ÌýJCWeinberger ÌýDRÌýPsychiatric disturbances in metachromatic leukodystrophy: insights into the neurobiology of psychosis.ÌýÌýArch Neurol. 1992;49401-Ìý406
82.
Buchsbaum ÌýMSTang ÌýCYPeled ÌýSGudbjartsson ÌýHLu ÌýDHazlett ÌýEADownhill ÌýJHaznedar ÌýMFallon ÌýJHAtlas ÌýSWÌýMRI white matter diffusion anisotropy and PET metabolic rate in schizophrenia.ÌýÌýNeuroreport. 1998;9425-Ìý430
83.
Lim ÌýKOHedehus ÌýMMoseley ÌýMde Crespigny ÌýASullivan ÌýEPfeferbaum ÌýAÌýCompromised white matter tract integrity in schizophrenia inferred from diffusion tensor imaging.ÌýÌýArch Gen Psychiatry. 1999;56367-Ìý374
84.
Foong ÌýJMaier ÌýMDark ÌýABarker ÌýGJMiller ÌýDHRon ÌýMAÌýNeuropathological abnormalities of the corpus callosum in schizophrenia: a diffusion tensor imaging study.ÌýÌýJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;68242-Ìý244
85.
Hakak ÌýYWalker ÌýJRLi ÌýCWong ÌýWHDavis ÌýKLBuxbaum ÌýJDHaroutunian ÌýVFienberg ÌýAAÌýGenome-wide expression analysis reveals dysregulation of myelination-related genes in chronic schizophrenia.ÌýÌýProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;984746-Ìý4751
86.
Uranova ÌýNOrlovskaya ÌýDVikhreva ÌýOZimina ÌýIKolomeets ÌýNVostrikov ÌýVRachmanova ÌýVÌýElectron microscopy of oligodendroglia in severe mental illness.ÌýÌýBrain Res Bull. 2001;55597-Ìý561
87.
Benes ÌýFMÌýMyelination of cortical-hippocampal relays during late adolescence.ÌýÌýSchizophr Bull. 1989;15585-Ìý593
88.
Bilder ÌýRMBogerts ÌýBAshtari ÌýMWu ÌýHAlvir ÌýJMJody ÌýDReiter ÌýGBell ÌýLLieberman ÌýJAÌýAnterior hippocampal volume reductions predict frontal lobe dysfunction in first episode schizophrenia.ÌýÌýSchizophr Res. 1995;1747-Ìý58
89.
Copolov ÌýDVelakoulis ÌýDMcGorry ÌýPMallard ÌýCarinaYung ÌýARees ÌýSJackson ÌýGRehn ÌýABrewer ÌýWPantelis ÌýCÌýNeurobiological findings in early phase schizophrenia.ÌýÌýBrain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;31157-Ìý165
90.
Hirayasu ÌýYShenton ÌýMESalisbury ÌýDFDickey ÌýCCFischer ÌýIAMazzoni ÌýPKisler ÌýTArakaki ÌýHKwon ÌýJSAnderson ÌýJEYurgelun-Todd ÌýDTohen ÌýMMcCarley ÌýRWÌýLower left temporal lobe MRI volumes in patients with first-episode schizophrenia compared with psychotic patients with first-episode affective disorder and normal subjects.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 1998;1551384-Ìý1391
91.
Rosen ÌýHJGorno-Tempini ÌýMLGoldman ÌýWPPerry ÌýRJSchuff ÌýNWeiner ÌýMFeiwell ÌýRKramer ÌýJHMiller ÌýBLÌýPatterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia.ÌýÌýNeurology. 2002;58198-Ìý208
92.
Ananth ÌýHPopescu ÌýICritchley ÌýHDGood ÌýCDFrackowiak ÌýRSDolan ÌýRJÌýCortical and subcortical gray matter abnormalities in schizophrenia determined through structural magnetic resonance imaging with optimized volumetric voxel-based morphometry.ÌýÌýAm J Psychiatry. 2002;1591497-Ìý1505
93.
Thieben ÌýMJDuggins ÌýAJGood ÌýCDGomes ÌýLMahant ÌýNRichards ÌýFMcCusker ÌýEFrackowiak ÌýRSÌýThe distribution of structural neuropathology in pre-clinical Huntington's disease.ÌýÌýµþ°ù²¹¾±²Ô. 2002;125 (pt 8) 1815-Ìý1828
94.
Thompson ÌýPMVidal ÌýCGiedd ÌýJNGochman ÌýPBlumenthal ÌýJNicolson ÌýRToga ÌýAWRapoport ÌýJLÌýMapping adolescent brain change reveals dynamic wave of accelerated gray matter loss in very early-onset schizophrenia.ÌýÌýProc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;9811650-Ìý11655
95.
Bookstein ÌýFLÌýVoxel-based morphometry should not be used with imperfectly registered images.ÌýÌýNeuroimage. 2001;141454-Ìý1462
×