ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Original Investigation
July 3, 2024

Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus and Longitudinal Assessment and Risk for Cognitive Impairment

Author Affiliations
  • 1Framingham Heart Study, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Department of Medicine (Biomedical Genetics), Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 3Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
  • 4George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
  • 5Department of Psychology, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey
  • 6Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 7Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 8Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 9Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 10Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 11Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 12Department of Psychiatry, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 13Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 14Department of Ophthalmology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024;81(10):993-1002. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.1678
Key Points

QuestionÌý Among cognitively normal adults in the community, what is the risk from subjective cognitive decline (SCD), using SCD-plus (SCD+) criteria and assessed longitudinally, associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer disease (AD), and all-cause dementia?

FindingsÌý In this cohort study using longitudinal data from the Framingham Heart Study including 3585 participants, SCD+ was significantly associated with survival time to MCI, AD, and all-cause dementia. Associations were independent of APOE status and an AD polygenic risk score.

MeaningÌý In a community setting, SCD+ was associated with an increased risk of future MCI, AD, and all-cause dementia with similar hazards estimated in clinic-based settings.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is recognized to be in the Alzheimer disease (AD) cognitive continuum. The SCD Initiative International Working Group recently proposed SCD-plus (SCD+) features that increase risk for future objective cognitive decline but that have not been assessed in a large community-based setting.

ObjectiveÌý To assess SCD risk for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD, and all-cause dementia, using SCD+ criteria among cognitively normal adults.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsÌý The Framingham Heart Study, a community-based prospective cohort study, assessed SCD between 2005 and 2019, with up to 12 years of follow-up. Participants 60 years and older with normal cognition at analytic baseline were included. Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models were adjusted for baseline age, sex, education, APOE ε4 status, and tertiles of AD polygenic risk score (PRS), excluding the APOE region. Data were analyzed from May 2021 to November 2023.

ExposureÌý SCD was assessed longitudinally using a single question and considered present if endorsed at the last cognitively normal visit. It was treated as a time-varying variable, beginning at the first of consecutive, cognitively normal visits, including the last, at which it was endorsed.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý Consensus-diagnosed MCI, AD, and all-cause dementia.

ResultsÌý This study included 3585 participants (mean [SD] baseline age, 68.0 [7.7] years; 1975 female [55.1%]). A total of 1596 participants (44.5%) had SCD, and 770 (21.5%) were carriers of APOE ε4. APOE ε4 and tertiles of AD PRS status did not significantly differ between the SCD and non-SCD groups. MCI, AD, and all-cause dementia were diagnosed in 236 participants (6.6%), 73 participants (2.0%), and 89 participants (2.5%), respectively, during follow-up. On average, SCD preceded MCI by 4.4 years, AD by 6.8 years, and all-cause dementia by 6.9 years. SCD was significantly associated with survival time to MCI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.22-2.03; P <.001), AD (HR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.89-4.70; P <.001), and all-cause dementia (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.44-3.18; P <.001). After adjustment for APOE and AD PRS, the hazards of SCD were largely unchanged.

Conclusions and RelevanceÌý Results of this cohort study suggest that in a community setting, SCD reflecting SCD+ features was associated with an increased risk of future MCI, AD, and all-cause dementia with similar hazards estimated in clinic-based settings. SCD may be an independent risk factor for AD and other dementias beyond the risk incurred by APOE ε4 and AD PRS.

Add or change institution
1 Comment for this article
EXPAND ALL
Comment on "Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus and Longitudinal Assessment and Risk for Cognitive Impairment"
Angelo Torrente, MD | Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (Bi.N.D.), University of Palermo, 90129, Via La Loggia 1, Palermo, Italy
Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is a clinical construct that has recently been identified as a risk factor for cognitive deterioration [1]. This condition is based on persistent, self-perceived cognitive disturbances without objective cognitive impairment. Certain characteristics increase the likelihood of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (i.e. the so-called SCD plus, SCD+)[1], including: subjective memory-related decline, onset of SCD within the last 5 years, age at onset ≥60 years, worries associated with SCD, feeling less performant than people of the same age, confirmation of cognitive decline by an informant, apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 genotype and biomarkers of AD. We read with interest the article by Kang et al, which is the largest prospective study to date on the evolution of SCD towards Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia [2]; in particular, SCD+ was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident MCI, AD, and all-cause dementia, regardless of the presence of APOE ε4.
We would like to discuss some methodological considerations regarding this article. First, it should be considered that there may be subjects who revert to non-SCD at follow-up (probably due to a behavioral trait) [3]. Unfortunately, Kang et al. in their study did not evaluate the different trajectories of persistent vs. non-persistent SCD in increasing the risk for MCI and dementia. On the other hand, it could be speculated that those who no longer complain of SCD may have lost awareness of the disease. Second, regarding comorbidities, residual confounding can be assumed. Indeed, although the authors assessed the presence of depression and cardiovascular disease, they did not consider other relevant disorders such as sleep disorders, which has been described as a robust predictor of SCD[3]. Last, SCD has also been shown to be negatively associated with health-related quality of life [4], interacting with cognitive reserve in increasing the risk of dementia at follow-up [5]. Therefore, also these factors should be considered in future prospective work on SCD.
In conclusion, SCD is a highly prevalent condition that deserves to be studied to early identify AD and dementia. However, future studies should also evaluate the possibility of prospective reversion to a non-SCD state with probable behavioral genesis, by multimodally assessing the presence of somatic comorbidities and including factors such as cognitive reserve and health-related quality of life. Such data will be critical to better assess and define the prognostic value of SCD. Roberto Monastero, MD, PhD, Associate Professor; Angelo Torrente, MD; Nicola Veronese, MD.

References
1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Van Boxtel M, Breteler M, Ceccaldi M, Chételat G, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s and Dementia. 2014 Nov 1;10(6):844–52.
2. Kang M, Li C, Mahajan A, Spat-Lemus J, Durape S, Chen J, et al. Subjective Cognitive Decline Plus and Longitudinal Assessment and Risk for Cognitive Impairment. JAMA Psychiatry [Internet]. 2024 Jul 3;
3. Ball HA, Coulthard E, Fish M, Bayer A, Gallacher J, Ben-Shlomo Y. Predictors and prognosis of population-based subjective cognitive decline: longitudinal evidence from the Caerphilly Prospective Study (CaPS). BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 16;13(10):e073205. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073205. PMID: 37844990; PMCID: PMC10582873.
4. Königsberg A, Belau MH, Ascone L, Gallinat J, Kühn S, Jensen M, Gerloff C, Cheng B, Thomalla G. Subjective
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
×