vlog

Object moved to here.

Complete Response to Locoregional Therapy Plus Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Targeted and Immune Therapy | JAMA Oncology | vlog

vlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1 Comment for this article
EXPAND ALL
Complete Response to Locoregional Therapy Plus Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
penghui luo, Doctorate | The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University
Chiang CL and colleagues1 reported that the patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, who were therapid by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus anti– programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody or anti–programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, could attain the long-term survival after achieved radiologic CR. However, we raise some points for discussion.
First, whether antiviral therapy was accepted? For the people with HBV- or HCV-related HCC, antiviral therapy is associated with their long-term survival and helps lower the recurrence risk.2
Second, should plus bevacizumab in the sudy? In IMbrave150 trial3, the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in
patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly improved with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab than sorafenib. It was included in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (NCCN, version 1.2024) as a first-line treatment option for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, which is a Category I recommendation.
Third, how to avoid radiation liver disease (RILD) when radiotherapy is given to tumors as large as 18 cm, even tumors with a total lesion of 31.1 cm? For the greater the range of radiation exposure, the higher the incidence of RILD, which may even be fatal. The risk of RILD is even higher when RT is used in combination with immunotherapy.4

Reference
1. Chiang CL, Chan KSK, Chiu KWH, et al. Complete Response to Locoregional Therapy Plus Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 2024;26:e244085.
2. Huang DQ, Hoang JK, Kamal R, et al. Antiviral Therapy Utilization and 10-Year Outcomes in Resected Hepatitis B Virus- and Hepatitis C Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(7):790-799.
3. Cheng AL, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Updated efficacy and safety data from IMbrave150: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs. sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):862-873.
4. Du S, Chen G, Yuan B, et al. DNA sensing and associated type 1 interferon signaling contributes to progression of radiation-induced liver injury. Cell Mol Immunol. 2021;18(7):1718-1728.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
Original Investigation
September 26, 2024

Complete Response to Locoregional Therapy Plus Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong and University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 3Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 4Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 5Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  • 6Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  • 7Clinical Oncology Center, University of Hong Kong–Shenzhen Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  • 8Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, Gleneagles Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  • 9Medical Physics Unit, Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, China
  • 10Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 11State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(11):1548-1553. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.4085
Key Points

Question What are the long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who are placed on a watch-and-wait protocol after achieving radiologic complete remission (CR) with combined locoregional therapy (LRT) and immunotherapy (IO)?

Findings In this cohort study of 63 patients, 46% achieved CR after LRT-IO and 76% of patients with CR were alive at 3 years.

Meaning Watch and wait may be a feasible strategy in patients who have achieved CR after LRT-IO, and further randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Abstract

Importance Previous studies showed that 42% to 50% of patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) achieved complete remission (CR) after combined locoregional therapy (LRT) plus immunotherapy (IO). However, data on predictors of CR and long-term clinical outcomes without surgery and after discontinuation of IO are lacking.

Objective To assess the long-term clinical outcomes among patients with unresectable HCC who achieved CR after LRT-IO and were placed on a watch-and-wait protocol.

Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included patients with unresectable HCC who achieved CR after LRT-IO in 2 prospective studies between January 2018 and December 2022. The time of data cutoff was June 2023. Radiologic CR was defined per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. All patients underwent close surveillance after CR without surgical interventions, and IO was discontinued.

Exposure All patients had received stereotactic body radiotherapy followed by anti–programmed cell death protein 1 or anti–programmed death ligand 1 therapy. Forty-nine patients had received a dose of transarterial chemoembolization before stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary outcomes included the 3-year time-to-progression rate, 3-year local control rate, and relapse pattern. Factors associated with CR were analyzed using multivariate analyses.

Results A total of 63 patients were enrolled (58 male [92.1%]; median age, 69 years [range, 18-90 years]); 38 patients (60.3%) had macrovascular invasion, and the median tumor diameter was 10 cm (range, 3.8-31.1 cm). The median follow-up time was 34.7 months (95% CI, 6.5-64.6 months). Twenty-nine patients (46.0%) achieved CR. The patients achieving CR had a significantly better 3-year OS rate than patients not achieving CR (75.5% [95% CI, 58.2%-98.3%] vs 28.1% [95% CI, 7.4%-29.4%]; P < .001). Among the 29 patients with CR, the 3-year time-to-progression rate was 58.7% (95% CI, 38.7%-79.1%) and the 3-year local control rate was 90.5% (95% CI, 78.2%-100%). Ten patients (34.5%) developed recurrence; among them, 6 (60.0%) with solitary intrahepatic disease relapse underwent curative surgical treatment. The absence of tumor vascular invasion (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.89) and the sum of the largest lesion diameters of 8 cm or less (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.98) were associated with CR.

Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study of LRT-IO with long-term follow-up data found a durable response in patients with locally advanced unresectable HCC. Long-term survival was attainable in patients with radiologic CR. Further randomized clinical trials are warranted.

×