ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Neoadjuvant Exercise Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Phase 1, Decentralized Nonrandomized ControlledTrial | Reproductive Health | JAMA Oncology | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Iyengar ÌýNM, Jones ÌýLW. ÌýDevelopment of exercise as interception therapy for cancer: a review.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Oncol. 2019;5(11):1620-1627. doi:
2.
Friedenreich ÌýCM, Wang ÌýQ, Neilson ÌýHK, Kopciuk ÌýKA, McGregor ÌýSE, Courneya ÌýKS. ÌýPhysical activity and survival after prostate cancer.Ìý ÌýEur Urol. 2016;70(4):576-585. doi:
3.
Kenfield ÌýSA, Stampfer ÌýMJ, Giovannucci ÌýE, Chan ÌýJM. ÌýPhysical activity and survival after prostate cancer diagnosis in the health professionals follow-up study.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2011;29(6):726-732. doi:
4.
Richman ÌýEL, Kenfield ÌýSA, Stampfer ÌýMJ, Paciorek ÌýA, Carroll ÌýPR, Chan ÌýJM. ÌýPhysical activity after diagnosis and risk of prostate cancer progression: data from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor.Ìý Ìý°ä²¹²Ô³¦±ð°ù Res. 2011;71(11):3889-3895. doi:
5.
Wang ÌýY, Jacobs ÌýEJ, Gapstur ÌýSM, Ìýet al. ÌýRecreational physical activity in relation to prostate cancer–specific mortality among men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer.Ìý ÌýEur Urol. 2017;72(6):931-939. doi:
6.
Kang ÌýDW, Fairey ÌýAS, Boulé ÌýNG, Field ÌýCJ, Wharton ÌýSA, Courneya ÌýKS. ÌýEffects of exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness and biochemical progression in men with localized prostate cancer under active surveillance: the ERASE randomized clinical trial.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Oncol. 2021;7(10):1487-1495. doi:
7.
Yang ÌýZ, Gao ÌýY, He ÌýK, Ìýet al. ÌýVoluntarily wheel running inhibits the growth of CRPC xenograft by inhibiting HMGB1 in mice.Ìý ÌýExp Gerontol. 2023;174:112118. doi:
8.
Jones ÌýLW, Antonelli ÌýJ, Masko ÌýEM, Ìýet al. ÌýExercise modulation of the host-tumor interaction in an orthotopic model of murine prostate cancer.Ìý ÌýJ Appl Physiol (1985). 2012;113(2):263-272. doi:
9.
Bourke ÌýL, Stevenson ÌýR, Turner ÌýR, Ìýet al. ÌýExercise training as a novel primary treatment for localised prostate cancer: a multi-site randomised controlled phase II study.Ìý ÌýSci Rep. 2018;8(1):8374. doi:
10.
Jones ÌýLW, Hornsby ÌýWE, Freedland ÌýSJ, Ìýet al. ÌýEffects of nonlinear aerobic training on erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular function following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.Ìý ÌýEur Urol. 2014;65(5):852-855. doi:
11.
Galvão ÌýDA, Taaffe ÌýDR, Spry ÌýN, Joseph ÌýD, Newton ÌýRU. ÌýCombined resistance and aerobic exercise program reverses muscle loss in men undergoing androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer without bone metastases: a randomized controlled trial.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):340-347. doi:
12.
Segal ÌýRJ, Reid ÌýRD, Courneya ÌýKS, Ìýet al. ÌýRandomized controlled trial of resistance or aerobic exercise in men receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2009;27(3):344-351. doi:
13.
Segal ÌýRJ, Reid ÌýRD, Courneya ÌýKS, Ìýet al. ÌýResistance exercise in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2003;21(9):1653-1659. doi:
14.
Jones ÌýLW. ÌýPrecision oncology framework for investigation of exercise as treatment for cancer.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2015;33(35):4134-4137. doi:
15.
Hawk ÌýET, Greenwood ÌýA, Gritz ÌýER, Ìýet al; Translational Research Working Group. ÌýThe Translational Research Working Group developmental pathway for lifestyle alterations.Ìý ÌýClin Cancer Res. 2008;14(18):5707-5713. doi:
16.
Sasso ÌýJP, Eves ÌýND, Christensen ÌýJF, Koelwyn ÌýGJ, Scott ÌýJ, Jones ÌýLW. ÌýA framework for prescription in exercise-oncology research.Ìý ÌýJ Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2015;6(2):115-124. doi:
17.
Yap ÌýTA, Smith ÌýAD, Ferraldeschi ÌýR, Al-Lazikani ÌýB, Workman ÌýP, de Bono ÌýJS. ÌýDrug discovery in advanced prostate cancer: translating biology into therapy.Ìý ÌýNat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(10):699-718. doi:
18.
Ligibel ÌýJA, Bohlke ÌýK, May ÌýAM, Ìýet al. ÌýExercise, diet, and weight management during cancer treatment: ASCO guideline.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2022;40(22):2491-2507. doi:
19.
American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians. ÌýATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing.Ìý ÌýAm J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(2):211-277. doi:
20.
O’Quigley ÌýJ, Pepe ÌýM, Fisher ÌýL. ÌýContinual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer.Ìý Ìýµþ¾±´Ç³¾±ð³Ù°ù¾±³¦²õ. 1990;46(1):33-48. doi:
21.
Iasonos ÌýA, Wilton ÌýAS, Riedel ÌýER, Seshan ÌýVE, Spriggs ÌýDR. ÌýA comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme in Phase I dose-finding studies.Ìý ÌýClin Trials. 2008;5(5):465-477. doi:
22.
Scott ÌýJM, Iyengar ÌýNM, Nilsen ÌýTS, Ìýet al. ÌýFeasibility, safety, and efficacy of aerobic training in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial.Ìý Ìý°ä²¹²Ô³¦±ð°ù. 2018;124(12):2552-2560. doi:
23.
Berney ÌýDM, Gopalan ÌýA, Kudahetti ÌýS, Ìýet al. ÌýKi-67 and outcome in clinically localised prostate cancer: analysis of conservatively treated prostate cancer patients from the Trans-Atlantic Prostate Group study.Ìý ÌýBr J Cancer. 2009;100(6):888-893. doi:
24.
Tretiakova ÌýMS, Wei ÌýW, Boyer ÌýHD, Ìýet al. ÌýPrognostic value of Ki67 in localized prostate carcinoma: a multi-institutional study of >1000 prostatectomies.Ìý ÌýProstate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016;19(3):264-270. doi:
25.
Fisher ÌýG, Yang ÌýZH, Kudahetti ÌýS, Ìýet al; Transatlantic Prostate Group. ÌýPrognostic value of Ki-67 for prostate cancer death in a conservatively managed cohort.Ìý ÌýBr J Cancer. 2013;108(2):271-277. doi:
26.
Gasinska ÌýA, Jaszczynski ÌýJ, Rychlik ÌýU, Åuczynska ÌýE, Pogodzinski ÌýM, Palaczynski ÌýM. ÌýPrognostic significance of serum PSA level and telomerase, VEGF and GLUT-1 protein expression for the biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.Ìý ÌýPathol Oncol Res. 2020;26(2):1049-1056. doi:
27.
Stephenson ÌýAJ, Kattan ÌýMW, Eastham ÌýJA, Ìýet al. ÌýProstate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy for patients treated in the prostate-specific antigen era.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2009;27(26):4300-4305. doi:
28.
Demark-Wahnefried ÌýW, Rais-Bahrami ÌýS, Desmond ÌýRA, Ìýet al. ÌýPresurgical weight loss affects tumour traits and circulating biomarkers in men with prostate cancer.Ìý ÌýBr J Cancer. 2017;117(9):1303-1313. doi:
29.
Berruti ÌýA, Generali ÌýD, Kaufmann ÌýM, Ìýet al. ÌýInternational expert consensus on primary systemic therapy in the management of early breast cancer: highlights of the Fourth Symposium on Primary Systemic Therapy in the Management of Operable Breast Cancer, Cremona, Italy (2010).Ìý ÌýJ Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2011;2011(43):147-151. doi:
30.
Dowsett ÌýM, Nielsen ÌýTO, A’Hern ÌýR, Ìýet al; International Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Working Group. ÌýAssessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer working group.Ìý ÌýJ Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(22):1656-1664. doi:
31.
Nilsen ÌýTS, Scott ÌýJM, Michalski ÌýM, Ìýet al. ÌýNovel methods for reporting of exercise dose and adherence: an exploratory analysis.Ìý ÌýMed Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(6):1134-1141. doi:
32.
Scott ÌýJM, Zabor ÌýEC, Schwitzer ÌýE, Ìýet al. ÌýEfficacy of exercise therapy on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2018;36(22):2297-2305. doi:
33.
Hansen ÌýAR, Cook ÌýN, Amir ÌýE, Siu ÌýLL, Abdul Razak ÌýAR. ÌýDeterminants of the recommended phase 2 dose of molecular targeted agents.Ìý Ìý°ä²¹²Ô³¦±ð°ù. 2017;123(8):1409-1415. doi:
34.
Carey ÌýLA. ÌýNeoadjuvant clinical trial designs: challenges of the genomic era.Ìý Ìýµþ°ù±ð²¹²õ³Ù. 2015;24(suppl 2):S88-S90. doi:
35.
De Mattos-Arruda ÌýL, Shen ÌýR, Reis-Filho ÌýJS, Cortés ÌýJ. ÌýTranslating neoadjuvant therapy into survival benefits: one size does not fit all.Ìý ÌýNat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(9):566-579. doi:
36.
Holmes ÌýMD, Chen ÌýWY, Feskanich ÌýD, Kroenke ÌýCH, Colditz ÌýGA. ÌýPhysical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡. 2005;293(20):2479-2486. doi:
37.
Meyerhardt ÌýJA, Heseltine ÌýD, Niedzwiecki ÌýD, Ìýet al. ÌýImpact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: findings from CALGB 89803.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Oncol. 2006;24(22):3535-3541. doi:
38.
Campbell ÌýKL, Winters-Stone ÌýKM, Wiskemann ÌýJ, Ìýet al. ÌýExercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable.Ìý ÌýMed Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(11):2375-2390. doi:
39.
Patel ÌýAV, Friedenreich ÌýCM, Moore ÌýSC, Ìýet al. ÌýAmerican College of Sports Medicine roundtable report on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and cancer prevention and control.Ìý ÌýMed Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(11):2391-2402. doi:
Views 4,068
Original Investigation
July 18, 2024

Neoadjuvant Exercise Therapy in Prostate Cancer: A Phase 1, Decentralized Nonrandomized ControlledTrial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • 2Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
  • 3Institute for Precision Health, University of California, Los Angeles
  • 4Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
  • 5Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles
  • 6Department of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles
  • 7Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(9):1187-1194. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.2156
Key Points

QuestionÌý What is the feasibility and tumor biological activity of neoadjuvant exercise therapy in men with localized prostate cancer?

FindingsÌý In this decentralized, phase 1a, nonrandomized clinical trial that included 53 men with treatment-naive localized prostate cancer in the preoperative setting, all exercise therapy dose levels were feasible, with 225 to 375 minutes per week showing promising biological activity.

MeaningÌý The results of this trial suggest that 225 minutes per week can be selected as the recommended phase 2 dose; further evaluation of exercise therapy at this dose is warranted in prostate and other solid tumors.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý Observational data have shown that postdiagnosis exercise is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer death. The feasibility and tumor biological activity of exercise therapy is not known.

ObjectiveÌý To identify recommended phase 2 dose of exercise therapy for patients with prostate cancer.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsÌý This single-center, phase 1a dose-finding trial was conducted at a tertiary cancer center using a patientcentric, decentralized platform and included 53 inactive men with treatment-naive localized prostate cancer scheduled to undergo surgical resection between June 2019 and January 2023. Data were analyzed in June 2024.

InterventionÌý Six escalated exercise therapy dose levels ranging from 90 to 450 minutes per week of individualized, moderate-intensity treadmill walking, allocated using adaptive continual reassessment. All exercise therapy sessions were conducted remotely with real-time monitoring.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý Feasibility was evaluated by relative exercise dose intensity (REDI). A dose level was considered feasible if 70% or more of patients achieved an REDI of 75% or greater. Activity end points were changes in tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) and plasma prostate-specific antigen levels between pretreatment and postintervention. Safety and changes in patient physiology were also assessed.

ResultsÌý A total of 53 men were enrolled (median [IQR] age, 61 [56-66] years). All dose levels were feasible (≥75% REDI). The mean (95% CI) changes in Ki67 were 5.0% (–4.3% to 14.0%) for 90 minutes per week, 2.4% (–1.3% to 6.2%) for 150 minutes per week, –1.3% (–5.8% to 3.3%) for 225 minutes per week, –0.2% (–4.0% to 3.7%) for 300 minutes per week, –2.6% (–9.2% to 4.1%) for 375 minutes per week, and 2.2% (−0.8% to 5.1%) for 450 minutes per week. Changes in prostate-specific antigen levels were 1.0 ng/mL (–1.8 to 3.8) for 90 minutes per week, 0.2 ng/mL (–1.1 to 1.5) for 150 minutes per week, –0.5 ng/mL (–1.2 to 0.3) for 225 minutes per week, –0.2 (–1.7 to 1.3) for 300 minutes per week, –0.7 ng/mL (–1.7 to 0.4) for 375 minutes per week, and –0.9 ng/mL (–2.4 to 0.7) for 450 minutes per week. No serious adverse events were observed. Overall, 225 minutes per week (approximately 45 minutes per treatment at 5 times weekly) was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose.

Conclusions and RelevanceÌý The results of this nonrandomized clinical trial suggest that neoadjuvant exercise therapy is feasible and safe with promising activity in localized prostate cancer.

Trial RegistrationÌý ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

×