Key PointsQuestionÌý
What are the magnitude and moderators of the association between nurse burnout and health care quality and safety?
FindingsÌý
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies including 288 581 nurses, nurse burnout was associated with a lower patient safety climate and patient safety grade; more nosocomial infections, patient falls, medication errors, and adverse events; lower patient satisfaction ratings; and lower nurse-assessed quality of care. The associations were consistent across nurse age, sex, work experience, and geography.
MeaningÌý
These findings suggest that systems-level interventions for nurse burnout may improve patient outcomes.
ImportanceÌý
Occupational burnout syndrome is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a diminished sense of personal accomplishment and is prevalent among nurses. Although previous meta-analyses have explored the correlates of nurse burnout, none have estimated their association with health care quality and safety and patient morbidity and mortality.
ObjectiveÌý
To evaluate the magnitude and moderators of the association between nurse burnout and patient safety, patient satisfaction, and quality of care.
Data SourceÌý
The Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and ProQuest databases were searched from January 1, 1994, to February 29, 2024.
Study SelectionÌý
Two reviewers independently identified studies that reported a quantifiable association between nurse burnout and any of the outcomes of patient safety, patient satisfaction, or quality of health care.
Data Extraction and SynthesisÌý
The PRISMA 2020 guideline was followed. Two reviewers independently extracted the standardized mean difference (SMD) (Cohen d) estimates for a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were conducted using prespecified variables.
Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý
Any measure of patient safety, patient satisfaction, or quality of health care previously associated with nurse burnout.
ResultsÌý
A total of 85 studies (81 cross-sectional and 4 longitudinal) involving 288 581 nurses from 32 countries (mean [SD] age, 33.9 (2.1) years; 82.7% female; mean [SD] burnout prevalence rate with study-specific ascertainments, 30.7% [9.7%]) were included. Nurse burnout was associated with a lower safety climate or culture (SMD, −0.68; 95% CI, −0.83 to −0.54), lower safety grade (SMD, −0.53; 95% CI, −0.72 to −0.34), and more frequent nosocomial infections (SMD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.36 to −0.04), patient falls (SMD, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.03), medication errors (SMD, −0.30; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.11), adverse events or patient safety incidents (SMD, −0.42; 95% CI, −0.76 to −0.07), and missed care or care left undone (SMD, −0.58; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.26) but not with the frequency of pressure ulcers. Nurse burnout was also associated with lower patient satisfaction ratings (SMD, −0.51; 95% CI, −0.86 to −0.17) but not with the frequencies of patient complaints or patient abuse. Finally, nurse burnout was associated with lower nurse-assessed quality of care (SMD, −0.44; 95% CI, −0.57 to −0.30) but not with standardized mortality rate. The associations were consistent across nurses’ age, sex, work experience, and geography and persistent over time. For patient safety outcomes, the association was smaller for the low personal accomplishment subcomponent of burnout than for emotional exhaustion or depersonalization, as well as for nurses with a college education.
Conclusions and RelevanceÌý
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, nurse burnout was found to be associated with lower health care quality and safety and lower patient satisfaction. This association was consistent across nurse and study characteristics.
Burnout syndrome has been characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a diminished sense of personal accomplishment and is typically observed to be the result of chronic workplace stress.1 Numerous meta-analyses have estimated the prevalence of nurse burnout, which ranged from 11% to 56%2,3 and was even higher during the COVID-19 pandemic given hospital overcrowding and understaffing.4,5 Meta-analyses have also explored the correlates of nurse burnout, including younger age,6 male sex,7 single or divorced marital status,7 not having children,7 low staffing levels,8 and workplace violence9 as risk factors and resilience,10 job control,11 social support,11 and nurse empowerment12 as protective factors. A few meta-analyses have examined the association of burnout with nurses’ well-being and career, including burnout and sleep problems,13 depression,14 and turnover intention.15 However, to our knowledge, no meta-analysis has estimated the association between nurse burnout and health care quality and safety and patient morbidity and mortality. This absence is interesting as there have been several meta-analyses investigating the association between physician burnout and patient safety, satisfaction, and quality of care.16,17
Nurses are on the front line of patient care in hospitals and other settings, often present when physicians are not, and charged with making important clinical decisions.18 Because of the critical role of nurses in delivering and, in some cases, overseeing patient care, nurse burnout may be associated with many dimensions of patient outcomes.
One systematic review involving 20 studies18 concluded that there was an association between nurse burnout and health care quality and safety, but it did not include a quantitative synthesis of the evidence to estimate the magnitude of the association. Moreover, due to the nature of the analysis, we do not know whether the association was moderated by subcomponents of burnout or by nurse demographics, clinical specialty, geographic area, or when the survey was conducted. Answering these questions may help to clarify the nature and severity of the adverse effects of nurse burnout and may help to inform nurse burnout interventions.19
This study evaluates through a systematic review and meta-analysis the magnitude and moderators of the association between nurse burnout and patient safety, patient satisfaction, and quality of care. Patient safety is defined as the absence of preventable harm to a patient,20 patient satisfaction as patients’ positive evaluations of distinct dimensions of the health care,21 and quality of care as the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes.22
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses () reporting guideline.23 The population, exposure, comparator, outcomes, and study design framework was used to specify eligibility criteria.24 The protocol was pre-registered at PROSPERO ( and ). The Stanford Institutional Review Board exempted the study from review and informed consent as there were no identifiable human participants.
The population was nurses. The inclusion criteria were (1) any type of nurse (eg, registered nurse, nurse practitioner, or nurse supervisor); (2) any specialty; (3) any geographic region; and (4) any age, sex, work experience, or educational level. Exclusion criteria were populations consisting of (1) midwives, (2) nursing assistants, (3) nursing students, and (4) mixed samples of nurses and physicians.
The exposure was burnout. The inclusion criteria were (1) any validated measure of burnout; (2) any validated measure of burnout subcomponents, including emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and low sense of personal accomplishment; (3) any validated measure of widely recognized synonyms of burnout subcomponents, such as cynicism and low professional efficacy; or (4) any study-specific measure that directly referred to burnout. Exclusion criteria were exposures related to but distinct from burnout, including (1) occupational stress, (2) fatigue, and (3) depressive symptoms. The comparator was (1) a low level of burnout if a continuous measure of burnout was used or (2) nonburnout if a dichotomous characterization of burnout was reported (eg, prevalence).
For outcomes, the inclusion criteria were (1) any measure of patient safety, including safety climate or safety culture, safety grade, patient safety incidents (any medical error or adverse event similar to those selected in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality indicators25); (2) any measure of patient satisfaction, including patient satisfaction survey rating, patient complaint, and patient abuse; and (3) any measure of quality of care, including nurse-assessed overall quality of care and commonly used objective quality indicators, such as length of hospital stay and 30-day standardized mortality rate. Exclusion criteria were structural antecedents of burnout (eg, nursing foundations for quality of care26).
For study design, a study had to report a quantifiable association between nurse burnout and any of the 3 outcomes to be included; both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies were eligible. Grey literature included dissertations. Qualitative studies and conference proceedings were excluded. Publications in languages other than English were excluded.
Two reviewers (L.Z.L. and P.Y.) applied any search term from each of the nurse, burnout, and quality of health care categories using specific search strings listed in eMethods 1 in Supplement 1, which were developed in consultation with a research librarian. In February 2024, the reviewers independently searched major databases from January 1, 1994, to February 29, 2024, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL (via EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (via EBSCOhost), and ProQuest. Using prespecified eligibility criteria, they independently included studies, identified additional studies from the reference lists, and extracted data. All discrepancies were resolved through discussion. The data were recorded in an online spreadsheet, and citations were managed with EndNote (Clarivate).
Due to expected heterogeneity, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to quantitatively synthesize the association between nurse burnout and quality of care. Statistics were converted to standardized mean differences (SMDs) (Cohen d) using conventional methods (eMethods 2 in Supplement 1).
Subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed using prespecified variables to examine heterogeneity. We used forest plots to compare outcome subtypes, burnout measures and subcomponents, clinical specialties, and regions. We used random-effects meta-regression to examine the stratification by age, sex, work experience, and educational level. Self-reported race and ethnicity were collected but not analyzed because of low comparability across countries and low power among US studies. We also grouped regions into World Bank–defined geographic areas for graphical display.27
All analyses were performed using R, version 4.3.2 (R Foundation). The significance level was defined as a 2-tailed P < .05 by t test.
Bias Assessment and Sensitivity Analysis
Two reviewers (L.Z.L. and P.Y.) independently used the Risk Of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) to assess 7 risks of bias.28 We used the serial exclusion method to assess small-study effect bias. As sensitivity analyses, we used forest plots and meta-regressions to examine alternative variable coding, sample selection, and confounding adjustment.
The included studies involved 288 581 nurses from at least 5322 hospitals in 32 countries (mean [SD] age, 33.9 [2.1] years; 82.7% female and 17.3% male). The mean (SD) percentage of US nurses who self-identified as White was 70.9% (6.0%) and 29.1% (6.0%) for other races and ethnicities. The mean (SD) percentage of nurses holding college degrees (bachelor’s degrees or higher) was 42.0% (15.7%), and the mean (SD) length work experience was 10.4 (1.6) years. The mean (SD) prevalence rate of burnout was 30.7% (9.7%) based on study-specific cutoffs. The ascertainments of burnout are described in eTable 1 in Supplement 1, and the burnout measures are compared in subgroup analyses later in the Results.
We identified 6231 studies from the initial search. Using prespecified criteria, 85 studies (81 cross-sectional and 4 longitudinal) were included for meta-analysis (eTables 1-5 in Supplement 1).29-113 The studies were published between 1994 and 2024 and had a median sample size of 458 individuals (IQR, 234-1352 individuals). A flow diagram of study inclusion and exclusion is provided in eFigure 1 in Supplement 1.
From the random-effects meta-analysis, we found negative associations between nurse burnout and various patient safety outcomes (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Specifically, nurse burnout was associated with a lower safety climate or safety culture (SMD, −0.68; 95% CI −0.83 to −0.54; I2 = 97.3%), lower safety grade (SMD, −0.53; 95% CI, −0.72 to −0.34; I2 = 97.1%), more frequent nosocomial infections (SMD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.36 to −0.04; I2 = 97.0%), more frequent patient falls (SMD, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.22 to −0.03; I2 = 62.2%), more frequent medication errors (SMD, −0.30; 95% CI, −0.48 to −0.11; I2 = 87.6%), more incidences of medical errors (SMD, −0.19; 95% CI, −0.32 to −0.05; I2 = 0.0%), more frequent adverse events or patient safety incidents (SMD, −0.42; 95% CI, −0.76 to −0.07; I2 = 97.3%), and more incidences of missed care or nursing care left undone (SMD, −0.58; 95% CI, −0.91 to −0.26; I2 = 92.2%). No association was found for frequency of pressure ulcers (SMD, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.24 to 0.01; I2 = 70.7%) or for the 1 study61 that investigated frequency of adverse infusion- and transfusion-related reactions (SMD, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.14 to 0.12).
The random-effects meta-analysis showed an association between nurse burnout and lower patient satisfaction survey ratings (SMD, −0.51; 95% CI, −0.86 to −0.17; I2 = 98.1%) (Figure 3). However, the association was not significant for 2 studies61,104 on the frequencies of patient complaints (SMD, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.43 to 0.12; I2 = 89.4%) and patient abuse (SMD, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.42 to 0.11; I2 = 88.8%).
The random-effects meta-analysis also showed negative associations between nurse burnout and quality of care outcomes (Figure 4). Specifically, nurse burnout was associated with lower nurse-assessed quality of care (SMD, −0.44; 95% CI, −0.57 to −0.30; I2 = 97.2%), a higher rate of tube feeding in nursing home patients (SMD, −0.20; 95% CI, −0.27 to −0.12),49 and a higher rate of urinary catheter use in nursing home patients (SMD, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.30 to −0.14).49 No association was found for length of stay in 1 study91 (SMD, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.04 to 0.02), failure to rescue rate in 1 study91 (SMD, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.05 to 0.00), and 30-day standardized mortality rate in 2 studies79,91 (SMD, −0.27; 95% CI, −0.75 to 0.20; I2 = 99.2%).
We conducted subgroup analyses of the planned variables for the patient safety quality-of-care outcomes. These analyses were stratified by measurement scale of burnout; subcomponents of burnout; nurse age, sex, work experience, and education; clinical specialty; geographic region; and survey time.
Stratification by Measurement Scale of Burnout
An association between nurse burnout and patient safety and quality of care was found for most burnout measurement scales (eFigures 2 and 3 in Supplement 1), including the Maslach Burnout Inventory (safety: SMD, −0.51 [95% CI, −0.61 to −0.41]; quality: SMD, −0.33 [95% CI, −0.45 to −0.21]), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (safety: SMD, −0.85; 95% CI, −1.04 to −0.66), Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (safety: SMD, −0.80; 95% CI, −1.06 to −0.53), and Bergen Burnout Inventory (safety: SMD, −2.32; 95% CI, −3.08 to −1.56). The Professional Quality of Life Questionnaire did not find an association of nurse burnout with patient safety (SMD, −0.81; 95% CI, −1.63 to 0.02), possibly due to low power, but found a significant association with quality of care (SMD, −0.92; 95% CI, −1.19 to −0.66). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory found a significant association of nurse burnout with patient safety (SMD, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.27 to −0.02) but did not find an association with quality of care (SMD, −0.84; 95% CI, −1.72 to 0.05).
Stratification by Subcomponent of Burnout
Forest plots (eFigures 4 and 5 in Supplement 1) showed that among the studies that used the Maslach Burnout Inventory as the measurement tool, the low personal accomplishment subcomponent of burnout had a smaller association with patient safety (SMD, −0.28; 95% CI, −0.38 to −0.19) than the emotional exhaustion subcomponent (SMD, −0.52; 95% CI, −0.63 to −0.41; z = −3.15; P = .002) and the depersonalization subcomponent (SMD, −0.45; 95% CI, −0.57 to −0.33; z = −2.10; P = .04). However, the forest plots did not show any difference in the association between nurse burnout and quality of care across the burnout subcomponents.
Stratification by Nurse Age, Sex, Work Experience, and Education
Meta-regression results indicated that the association between nurse burnout and patient safety and quality of care was consistent across various demographic characteristics. Specifically, the association was not moderated by nurses’ age (safety: meta-regression coefficient, −0.01 [95% CI, −0.03 to 0.02; P = .63]; quality: meta-regression coefficient, 0.01 [95% CI, −0.04 to 0.02; P = .48]), sex (safety: meta-regression coefficient, −0.43 [95% CI, −1.39 to 0.54; P = .39]; quality: meta-regression coefficient, 0.34 [95% CI, −1.63 to 2.30; P = .74]), or work experience (safety: meta-regression coefficient, −0.02 [95% CI, −0.05 to 0.01; P = .20]; quality: meta-regression coefficient, 0.01 [95% CI, −0.02 to 0.05; P = .46±Õ).
The association between nurse burnout and quality of care was not moderated by nurses’ educational level (meta-regression coefficient, −0.01; 95% CI, −0.49 to 0.47; P = .97) (eFigure 6 in Supplement 1). However, the association between nurse burnout and lower patient safety was smaller for the nurses with a higher percentage of college degrees (meta-regression coefficient, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.15-0.89; P = .006) (Figure 5). Stratification by graduate degrees (master’s degree or higher) is presented in eMethods 3 in Supplement 1, with the caveat of lower power.
Stratification by Clinical Specialty
The meta-regression showed negative associations between nurse burnout and patient safety and quality of care in most nursing specialties. Associations between nurse burnout and patient safety and quality of care by clinical specialty (eFigures 7 and 8 in Supplement 1) were as follows: nurses without a reported specialty (safety: SMD, −0.50 [95% CI, −0.62 to −0.38]; quality: SMD, −0.34 [95% CI, −0.49 to −0.19]), primary care (quality: SMD, −1.05; 95% CI, −1.29 to −0.80), acute care (safety: SMD, −0.55 [95% CI, −0.83 to −0.26]; quality: SMD, −0.34 [95% CI, −0.74 to 0.06]), emergency department or urgent care (safety: SMD, −0.16; 95% CI, −0.48 to 0.16), intensive care unit or critical care (safety: SMD, −0.62 [95% CI, −1.10 to −0.14]; quality: SMD, −0.66 [95% CI, −0.82 to −0.51]), pediatrics (safety: SMD, −0.29; 95% CI, −0.56 to −0.01), geriatrics (safety: SMD, −0.43 [95% CI, −0.93 to 0.06]; quality: SMD, −0.60 [95% CI, −1.26 to 0.07]), psychiatry (quality: SMD, −0.05; 95% CI, −0.22 to 0.12), maternity (safety: SMD, −0.76; 95% CI, −0.88 to −0.64), and oncology (safety: SMD, −0.93 [95% CI, −1.02 to −0.84]; quality: SMD, −0.55 [95% CI, −1.07 to −0.02]). For patient safety, the negative association was significant for all but geriatric and emergency nurses, possibly due to low power. For quality of care, the negative association was significant for all specialties except geriatrics, psychiatry, and acute care.
Stratification by Geography and Survey Time
The meta-regression showed negative associations between nurse burnout and health care quality and safety in most countries. A significant association between nurse burnout and patient safety was found in Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Ecuador, Germany, Iran, Ireland, Japan, Korea, Norway, Oman, the Slovak Republic, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the US but not in Greece, Italy, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia (eFigure 9 in Supplement 1). A significant association between nurse burnout and quality of care was observed in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Iceland, Iran, Italy, South Africa, Thailand, and the US but not in Germany, Japan, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (eFigure 10 in Supplement 1). eFigure 36 in Supplement 1 presents a graph of the mean association by geographic area.
The association between nurse burnout and patient safety was not moderated by when the survey was conducted (meta-regression coefficient, −0.00; 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.02; P = .98 (eFigure 11 in Supplement 1) over a 33-year survey completion period from 1991 to 2023. However, the association between nurse burnout and quality of care was more negative over time (meta-regression coefficient, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.009; P = .006) (eFigure 12 in Supplement 1), even after excluding the studies published after 2019 to account for the COVID-19 pandemic (eFigures 13 and 14 in Supplement 1).
Risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of exposure scores for each included study are provided in eTable 6 in Supplement 1 and a bubble plot in eFigure 15 in Supplement 1. The Begg rank test (z = −1.16; P = .25) (eFigures 16-19 in Supplement 1) did not indicate small-study effects, and a meta-analysis of nonaffirmative results suggested that the results were highly robust to hypothetical worst-case publication bias and p-hacking (eFigure 20 in Supplement 1).114 Serial exclusion of the studies found that each study contributed to a mean (SD) 0.00% (0.97%) of the Cohen d estimate (eTable 7 in Supplement 1). We show strength of evidence under effect heterogeneity115 in eFigures 21 and 22 in Supplement 1. We used robust variance estimation to account for multiple outcomes from the same study (eTable 8 in Supplement 1). Sensitivity analyses (eFigures 23 and 24 in Supplement 1) showed that burnout levels or prevalence rates did not moderate the association, suggesting that the results were not driven by divergent ascertainments of burnout.116 We found similar results using alternative variable coding (odds ratio conversion) (eFigures 25-30 in Supplement 1), sample selection (mixed professions) (eFigures 31-33 in Supplement 1), and confounding adjustment (eFigures 34 and 35 in Supplement 1).
This meta-analysis shows a negative association between nurse burnout and patient safety, patient satisfaction, and quality of care. The association between nurse burnout and these outcomes was consistent independent of nurses’ age, sex, work experience, and geography. The associations and effect size between nurse burnout and quality of care were also consistent with previous meta-analyses of burnout and quality of care in physicians and pooled studies of health care professionals.16,17
The emotional exhaustion and depersonalization dimensions of burnout, more so than personal accomplishment, were observed to be the most closely associated with patient safety. This finding is consistent with previous research suggesting that the personal accomplishment dimension may be a somewhat distinct construct.117
The association of nurse burnout with patient safety was persistent over time, and the association with quality of care was increasingly negative over 3 decades, even after accounting for the COVID-19 pandemic. This finding is concerning considering decades of national and organizational efforts for quality improvement.
The moderation of having a bachelor’s degree on patient safety and having a graduate degree on quality of care were consistent with a previous finding that higher levels of nurse education were associated with lower patient mortality.117 Accordingly, investments in nursing education and training may be considered as a component of burnout mitigation efforts.
To date, most antiburnout efforts have focused on individual interventions, such as mindfulness or personal resilience training designed to help people more effectively cope with stress, instead of interventions to reduce stress and burnout in the workplace.118 Many effective interventions are at the work unit level, where health care workers experience teamwork, feelings of community, professional development, and recognition. Numerous health care organizations have begun to take action, including appointing senior leaders to develop an organizational strategy to address the root cause issues in the clinical practice environment, such as low staffing levels and long work hours or overtime.119 Hospital accrediting bodies have also begun evaluating such organizational efforts, which may encourage more widespread adoption.120
The US Surgeon General has prioritized the mitigation of burnout for the nation’s health care delivery system.121 The National Academy of Medicine has launched a holistic action collaborative involving stakeholder groups, including health care payers, technology companies, government agencies, professional societies, and health care organizations to promote well-being for health care workers.122 Congress has passed legislation allocating more than $100 million of funding to promote mental health, foster resilience, and reduce stigma among health care professionals.123 Allocation of even more substantive funding, commensurate with the magnitude and adverse effects of health worker burnout, seems necessary to support research and implementation of evidence-based approaches to reduce clinician burnout.
This study is subject to several limitations. One key limitation of the meta-analysis is the heterogeneity across the included studies, which is common among studies of psychosocial factors. Another limitation is that most included studies used cross-sectional research designs, which prevented us from determining the causal direction of the association between nurse burnout and the outcomes. We also combined 2 separate preregistrations because we determined that patient safety is an inseparable dimension of quality of care.124 Finally, despite many countries included, the comparisons by geography did not represent all countries in an area and should be interpreted with that qualification.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 85 studies, nurse burnout was associated with lower health care quality and safety and lower patient satisfaction. These associations were consistent across nurses’ age, sex, work experience, and geography and have been persistent over time.
Accepted for Publication: September 12, 2024.
Published: November 5, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43059
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2024 Li LZ et al. ÌÇÐÄvlog Open.
Corresponding Author: Peilin Yang, BS, Department of Economics, Barcelona School of Economics, Carrer de Ramon Trias Fargas, 25-27, Sant MartÃ, 08005 Barcelona, Spain (peilin.yang@upf.edu).
Author Contributions: Messrs Li and Yang had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Messrs Li and Yang contributed equally as co–first authors.
Concept and design: Li, Yang, Pfeffer.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Li, Yang, Singer, Mathur, Shanafelt.
Drafting of the manuscript: Li.
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Yang, Singer, Pfeffer, Mathur, Shanafelt.
Statistical analysis: Yang, Mathur.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Yang.
Supervision: Pfeffer, Mathur.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Shanafelt reported receiving patents for well-being index and leadership behavior index instruments, with royalties shared with the Mayo Clinic (the copyright holder), and speaker honoraria from Baylor Scott & White Health; UT Southwestern Medical Center; California Pacific Medical Center; Albany Medical Center; Doctors’ Health SA; Southwestern Health Resources; University of California, San Diego; All American Entertainment (on behalf of the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada); Samaritan Health Services; American Society of Clinical Oncology; Centra; American Medical Group Association; Inland Empire Health Plan; Cleveland Clinic; NYU Grossman School of Medicine (Emergency Medicine); Beamtree Health Roundtable; Well-Being Collaborative of Arizona Health Professionals; Corewell Health; Mercy Clinic East Community; Federation of Medical Specialists of Quebec; Sutter Health; Overlake Hospital; Gould Medical Group; Optum Massachusetts (Reliant Medical Group and Atrius Health); DAP Health; Children’s National Hospital; Georgia Heart Institute; Honor Health of Arizona; Meharry Medical College; and the University of Kentucky College of Medicine and UK HealthCare, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Business, Government, and Society Research Fund from the Stanford Graduate School of Business (Mr Li).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
Additional Contributions: The authors acknowledge suggestions from Phyllis Kayten, PhD, Stanford University Libraries, on the development of search keywords and strategies and suggestions from Sarah A. Soule, PhD, Stanford University. Dr Kayten and Prof Soule did not receive compensation for their contributions.
1.Maslach
ÌýC, Schaufeli
ÌýWB, Leiter
ÌýMP. ÌýJob burnout.Ìý ÌýAnnu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):397-422. doi:
2.Woo
ÌýT, Ho
ÌýR, Tang
ÌýA, Tam
ÌýW. ÌýGlobal prevalence of burnout symptoms among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýJ Psychiatr Res. 2020;123:9-20. doi:
3.Zhang
ÌýYY, Han
ÌýWL, Qin
ÌýW,
Ìýet al. ÌýExtent of compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue and burnout in nursing: a meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Manag. 2018;26(7):810-819. doi:
4.Ge
ÌýMW, Hu
ÌýFH, Jia
ÌýYJ, Tang
ÌýW, Zhang
ÌýWQ, Chen
ÌýHL. ÌýGlobal prevalence of nursing burnout syndrome and temporal trends for the last 10 years: a meta-analysis of 94 studies covering over 30 countries.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Nurs. 2023;32(17-18):5836-5854. doi:
5.Shah
ÌýMK, Gandrakota
ÌýN, Cimiotti
ÌýJP, Ghose
ÌýN, Moore
ÌýM, Ali
ÌýMK. ÌýPrevalence of and factors associated with nurse burnout in the US.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2036469. doi:
6.Gómez-Urquiza
ÌýJL, Vargas
ÌýC, De la Fuente
ÌýEI, Fernández-Castillo
ÌýR, Cañadas-De la Fuente
ÌýGA. ÌýAge as a risk factor for burnout syndrome in nursing professionals: a meta-analytic study.Ìý ÌýRes Nurs Health. 2017;40(2):99-110. doi:
7.Cañadas-De la Fuente
ÌýGA, Ortega
ÌýE, Ramirez-Baena
ÌýL, De la Fuente-Solana
ÌýEI, Vargas
ÌýC, Gómez-Urquiza
ÌýJL. ÌýGender, marital status, and children as risk factors for burnout in nurses: a meta-analytic study.Ìý ÌýInt J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2102. doi:
8.Shin
ÌýS, Park
ÌýJH, Bae
ÌýSH. ÌýNurse staffing and nurse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýNurs Outlook. 2018;66(3):273-282. doi:
9.Wang
ÌýJ, Zeng
ÌýQ, Wang
ÌýY,
Ìýet al. ÌýWorkplace violence and the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder and burnout among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Manag. 2022;30(7):2854-2868. doi:
10.Castillo-González
ÌýA, Velando-Soriano
ÌýA, De La Fuente-Solana
ÌýEI,
Ìýet al. ÌýRelation and effect of resilience on burnout in nurses: a literature review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýInt Nurs Rev. 2024;71(1):160-167. doi:
11.Aronsson
ÌýG, Theorell
ÌýT, Grape
ÌýT,
Ìýet al. ÌýA systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms.Ìý ÌýBMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):264. doi:
12.Şenol Çelik
ÌýS, Sariköse
ÌýS, Çelik
ÌýY. ÌýStructural and psychological empowerment and burnout among nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýInt Nurs Rev. 2024;71(1):189-201. doi:
13.Membrive-Jiménez
ÌýMJ, Gómez-Urquiza
ÌýJL, Suleiman-Martos
ÌýN,
Ìýet al. ÌýRelation between burnout and sleep problems in nurses: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýHealthcare (Basel). 2022;10(5):954. doi:
14.Özkan
ÌýAH. ÌýThe effect of burnout and its dimensions on turnover intention among nurses: a meta-analytic review.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Manag. 2022;30(3):660-669. doi:
15.Chen
ÌýC, Meier
ÌýST. ÌýBurnout and depression in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2021;124:104099. doi:
16.Hodkinson
ÌýA, Zhou
ÌýA, Johnson
ÌýJ,
Ìýet al. ÌýAssociations of physician burnout with career engagement and quality of patient care: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2022;378:e070442. doi:
17.Tawfik
ÌýDS, Scheid
ÌýA, Profit
ÌýJ,
Ìýet al. ÌýEvidence relating health care provider burnout and quality of care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýAnn Intern Med. 2019;171(8):555-567. doi:
18.Jun
ÌýJ, Ojemeni
ÌýMM, Kalamani
ÌýR, Tong
ÌýJ, Crecelius
ÌýML. ÌýRelationship between nurse burnout, patient and organizational outcomes: systematic review.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2021;119:103933. doi:
19.Lee
ÌýM, Cha
ÌýC. ÌýInterventions to reduce burnout among clinical nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ìý ÌýSci Rep. 2023;13(1):10971. doi:
20.Patient safety. World Health Organization. 2024. Accessed February 24, 2024.
21.Linder-Pelz
ÌýSU. ÌýToward a theory of patient satisfaction.Ìý ÌýSoc Sci Med. 1982;16(5):577-582. doi:
22.Quality of care. World Health Organization. 2024. Accessed February 24, 2024.
23.Page
ÌýMJ, McKenzie
ÌýJE, Bossuyt
ÌýPM,
Ìýet al. ÌýThe PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.Ìý Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2021;372:n71. doi:
24.Morgan
ÌýRL, Whaley
ÌýP, Thayer
ÌýKA, Schünemann
ÌýHJ. ÌýIdentifying the PECO: a framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes.Ìý ÌýEnviron Int. 2018;121(pt 1):1027-1031. doi:
25.PSI 90 fact sheet. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. August 31, 2016. Accessed March 24, 2024.
26.Lake
ÌýET. ÌýDevelopment of the practice environment scale of the Nursing Work Index.Ìý ÌýRes Nurs Health. 2002;25(3):176-188. doi:
27.World Bank country and lending groups. The World Bank Group. March 26, 2024. Accessed February 24, 2024.
28.Morgan
ÌýRL, Thayer
ÌýKA, Santesso
ÌýN,
Ìýet al; GRADE Working Group. ÌýA risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: a users’ guide to its application in the context of GRADE.Ìý ÌýEnviron Int. 2019;122:168-184. doi:
29.Abraham
ÌýCM, Zheng
ÌýK, Norful
ÌýAA, Ghaffari
ÌýA, Liu
ÌýJ, Poghosyan
ÌýL. ÌýPrimary care nurse practitioner burnout and perceptions of quality of care.Ìý ÌýNurs Forum. 2021;56(3):550-559. doi:
30.Aiken
ÌýLH, Sermeus
ÌýW, Van den Heede
ÌýK,
Ìýet al. ÌýPatient safety, satisfaction, and quality of hospital care: cross sectional surveys of nurses and patients in 12 countries in Europe and the United States.Ìý Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2012;344:e1717. doi:
31.Aiken
ÌýLH, Lasater
ÌýKB, Sloane
ÌýDM,
Ìýet al; US Clinician Wellbeing Study Consortium. ÌýPhysician and nurse well-being and preferred interventions to address burnout in hospital practice: factors associated with turnover, outcomes, and patient safety.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡ Health Forum. 2023;4(7):e231809. doi:
32.Al Ma’mari
ÌýQ, Sharour
ÌýLA, Al Omari
ÌýO. ÌýFatigue, burnout, work environment, workload and perceived patient safety culture among critical care nurses.Ìý ÌýBr J Nurs. 2020;29(1):28-34. doi:
33.Alves
ÌýDFS, Guirardello
ÌýEB. ÌýSafety climate, emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction among Brazilian paediatric professional nurses.Ìý ÌýInt Nurs Rev. 2016;63(3):328-335. doi:
34.Aly
ÌýNAEFM, Ghanem
ÌýM, El-Shanawany
ÌýS. ÌýOrganizational cynicism and its consequences on nurses and quality of care in critical care and toxicology units.Ìý ÌýJ Educ Pract. 2016;7(8):85-96.
35.Azimilolaty
ÌýH, Rezaei
ÌýS, Khorram
ÌýM, Mousavinasab
ÌýSN, Heidari
ÌýT. ÌýCorrelation between the quality of nursing care and burnout of nurses in the teaching hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.Ìý ÌýIran J Nurs. 2021;33(128):54-66. doi:
36.Bagnasco
ÌýA, Dasso
ÌýN, Rossi
ÌýS,
Ìýet al. ÌýA cross-sectional multisite exploration of Italian paediatric nurses’ reported burnout and its relationship to perceptions of clinical safety and adverse events using the RN4CAST@IT-Ped.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2020;76(8):2072-2081. doi:
37.Bao
ÌýY, Vedina
ÌýR, Moodie
ÌýS, Dolan
ÌýS. ÌýThe relationship between value incongruence and individual and organizational well-being outcomes: an exploratory study among Catalan nurses.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2013;69(3):631-641. doi:
38.Betsiou
ÌýS, Pitsiou
ÌýG, Panagiotidou
ÌýE, Sarridou
ÌýD, Kioumis
ÌýI, Boutou
ÌýAK. ÌýNursing errors in intensive care unit and their association with burnout, anxiety, insomnia and working environment: a cross-sectional study.Ìý Ìý±á¾±±è±è´Ç°ì°ù²¹³Ù¾±²¹. 2022;26(3):110-117.
39.Bilal
ÌýH, Yildirim Sari
ÌýH. ÌýRelación entre agotamiento emocional y la actitud hacia la seguridad del paciente en enfermeras pediátricas en un hospital de TurquÃa.Ìý ÌýEnferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2020;30(1):37-41. doi:
40.Boamah
ÌýSA, Read
ÌýEA, Spence Laschinger
ÌýHK. ÌýFactors influencing new graduate nurse burnout development, job satisfaction and patient care quality: a time-lagged study.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2017;73(5):1182-1195. doi:
41.Brooks Carthon
ÌýJM, Hatfield
ÌýL, Brom
ÌýH,
Ìýet al. ÌýSystem-level improvements in work environments lead to lower nurse burnout and higher patient satisfaction.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Care Qual. 2021;36(1):7-13. doi:
42.Chao
ÌýM, Shih
ÌýCT, Hsu
ÌýSF. ÌýNurse occupational burnout and patient-rated quality of care: the boundary conditions of emotional intelligence and demographic profiles.Ìý ÌýJpn J Nurs Sci. 2016;13(1):156-165. doi:
43.Cheng
ÌýC, Bartram
ÌýT, Karimi
ÌýL, Leggat
ÌýS. ÌýTransformational leadership and social identity as predictors of team climate, perceived quality of care, burnout and turnover intention among nurses.Ìý ÌýPerson Rev. 2016;45(6):1200-1216. doi:
44.Cheng
ÌýH, Yang
ÌýH, Ding
ÌýY, Wang
ÌýB. ÌýNurses’ mental health and patient safety: an extension of the Job Demands-Resources model.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Manag. 2020;28(3):653-663. doi:
45.Cimiotti
ÌýJP, Aiken
ÌýLH, Sloane
ÌýDM, Wu
ÌýES. ÌýNurse staffing, burnout, and health care-associated infection.Ìý ÌýAm J Infect Control. 2012;40(6):486-490. doi:
46.Clark
ÌýRRS, Lake
ÌýE. ÌýBurnout, job dissatisfaction and missed care among maternity nurses.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Manag. 2020;28(8):2001-2006. doi:
47.Colindres
ÌýCV, Bryce
ÌýE, Coral-Rosero
ÌýP, Ramos-Soto
ÌýRM, Bonilla
ÌýF, Yassi
ÌýA. ÌýEffect of effort-reward imbalance and burnout on infection control among Ecuadorian nurses.Ìý ÌýInt Nurs Rev. 2018;65(2):190-199. doi:
48.Dimitrios
ÌýM, Maria
ÌýP, Kloutsiniotis
ÌýP. ÌýThe influence of leadership on structural empowerment and work-life balance on nurses’ burnout and patients’ assessed quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic.Ìý ÌýMed Res Arch. 2023;11(7.1). doi:
49.Eltaybani
ÌýS, Yamamoto-Mitani
ÌýN, Ninomiya
ÌýA, Igarashi
ÌýA. ÌýThe association between nurses’ burnout and objective care quality indicators: a cross-sectional survey in long-term care wards.Ìý ÌýBMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):34. doi:
50.Fish
ÌýJA, Sharplin
ÌýG, Wang
ÌýL, An
ÌýY, Fan
ÌýX, Eckert
ÌýM. ÌýCross-cultural differences in nurse burnout and the relationship with patient safety: an East-West comparative study.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2022;78(4):1001-1011. doi:
51.Gensimore
ÌýMM, Maduro
ÌýRS, Morgan
ÌýMK, McGee
ÌýGW, Zimbro
ÌýKS. ÌýThe effect of nurse practice environment on retention and quality of care via burnout, work characteristics, and resilience: a moderated mediation model.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Adm. 2020;50(10):546-553. doi:
52.Giorgi
ÌýF, Mattei
ÌýA, Notarnicola
ÌýI, Petrucci
ÌýC, Lancia
ÌýL. ÌýCan sleep quality and burnout affect the job performance of shift-work nurses? a hospital cross-sectional study.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2018;74(3):698-708. doi:
53.Gravlin
ÌýGL. ÌýThe Relationships Among Nurse Work Satisfaction, Burnout, and Patient Satisfaction With Nursing Care. Teachers College, Columbia University; 1994.
54.Guirardello
ÌýEB. ÌýImpact of critical care environment on burnout, perceived quality of care and safety attitude of the nursing team.Ìý ÌýRev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2017;25(0):e2884. doi:
55.Gunnarsdóttir
ÌýS. ÌýQuality of Working Life and Quality of Care in Icelandic Hospital Nursing. University of London, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2006.
56.Halbesleben
ÌýJRB, Wakefield
ÌýBJ, Wakefield
ÌýDS, Cooper
ÌýLB. ÌýNurse burnout and patient safety outcomes: nurse safety perception versus reporting behavior.Ìý ÌýWest J Nurs Res. 2008;30(5):560-577. doi:
57.Holden
ÌýRJ, Scanlon
ÌýMC, Patel
ÌýNR,
Ìýet al. ÌýA human factors framework and study of the effect of nursing workload on patient safety and employee quality of working life.Ìý Ìýµþ²Ñ´³ Qual Saf. 2011;20(1):15-24. doi:
58.Im
ÌýC, Song
ÌýS, Kim
ÌýK. ÌýThe associations of psychological burnout and time factors on medication errors in rotating shift nurses in Korea: a cross sectional descriptive study.Ìý ÌýNurs Open. 2023;10(8):5550-5559. doi:
59.Johnson
ÌýJ, Cameron
ÌýL, Mitchinson
ÌýL,
Ìýet al. ÌýAn investigation into the relationships between bullying, discrimination, burnout and patient safety in nurses and midwives: is burnout a mediator?Ìý ÌýJ Res Nurs. 2019;24(8):604-619. doi:
60.Johnson
ÌýJ, Louch
ÌýG, Dunning
ÌýA,
Ìýet al. ÌýBurnout mediates the association between depression and patient safety perceptions: a cross-sectional study in hospital nurses.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2017;73(7):1667-1680. doi:
61.Kakemam
ÌýE, Chegini
ÌýZ, Rouhi
ÌýA, Ahmadi
ÌýF, Majidi
ÌýS. ÌýBurnout and its relationship to self-reported quality of patient care and adverse events during COVID-19: a cross-sectional online survey among nurses.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Manag. 2021;29(7):1974-1982. doi:
62.Khatatbeh
ÌýH, Al-Dwaikat
ÌýT, Alfatafta
ÌýH, Ali
ÌýAM, Pakai
ÌýA. ÌýBurnout, quality of life and perceived patient adverse events among paediatric nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Nurs. 2023;32(13-14):3874-3886. doi:
63.Khatatbeh
ÌýH, Al-Dwaikat
ÌýT, Rababah
ÌýJ, Oláh
ÌýA, Pakai
ÌýA. ÌýPaediatric nurses’ burnout, quality of life and perceived patient adverse events during the COVID-19 pandemic: testing an integrated model using structural equation modelling.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Nurs. 2024;33(1):255-264. doi:
64.Kim
ÌýMJ, Kim
ÌýYJ, Sim
ÌýHS. ÌýThe relationship between fatigue, burnout and patient safety management activities in clinical nurses.Ìý ÌýIndian J Sci Technol. 2015;8(35). doi:
65.Kirwan
ÌýM, Matthews
ÌýA, Scott
ÌýPA. ÌýThe impact of the work environment of nurses on patient safety outcomes: a multi-level modelling approach.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(2):253-263. doi:
66.Kwon
ÌýCY, Lee
ÌýB, Kwon
ÌýOJ, Kim
ÌýMS, Sim
ÌýKL, Choi
ÌýYH. ÌýEmotional labor, burnout, medical error, and turnover intention among South Korean nursing staff in a university hospital setting.Ìý ÌýInt J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10111. doi:
67.Laschinger
ÌýHKS, Shamian
ÌýJ, Thomson
ÌýD. ÌýImpact of magnet hospital characteristics on nurses’ perceptions of trust, burnout, quality of care, and work satisfaction.Ìý ÌýNurs Econ. 2001;19(5):209-219.
68.Spence Laschinger
ÌýHK, Leiter
ÌýMP. ÌýThe impact of nursing work environments on patient safety outcomes: the mediating role of burnout/engagement.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Adm. 2006;36(5):259-267. doi:
69.Leiter
ÌýMP, Harvie
ÌýP, Frizzell
ÌýC. ÌýThe correspondence of patient satisfaction and nurse burnout.Ìý ÌýSoc Sci Med. 1998;47(10):1611-1617. doi:
70.Liu
ÌýJ, Zheng
ÌýJ, Liu
ÌýK, You
ÌýL. ÌýRelationship between work environments, nurse outcomes, and quality of care in ICUs: mediating role of nursing care left undone.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Care Qual. 2019;34(3):250-255. doi:
71.Liu
ÌýJ, Zheng
ÌýJ, Liu
ÌýK,
Ìýet al. ÌýWorkplace violence against nurses, job satisfaction, burnout, and patient safety in Chinese hospitals.Ìý ÌýNurs Outlook. 2019;67(5):558-566. doi:
72.Liu
ÌýM, Liu
ÌýL, Lv
ÌýZ, Ma
ÌýF, Mao
ÌýY, Liu
ÌýY. ÌýEffects of burnout and work engagement in the relationship between self-efficacy and safety behaviours—a chained mediation modelling analysis.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2024;80(4):1473-1483. doi:
73.Liu
ÌýX, Zheng
ÌýJ, Liu
ÌýK,
Ìýet al. ÌýHospital nursing organizational factors, nursing care left undone, and nurse burnout as predictors of patient safety: a structural equation modeling analysis.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2018;86:82-89. doi:
74.Liu
ÌýY, Aungsuroch
ÌýY. ÌýFactors influencing nurse-assessed quality nursing care: a cross-sectional study in hospitals.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2018;74(4):935-945. doi:
75.Majrabi
ÌýM. ÌýNurses burnout, resilience and its association with safety culture: a cross sectional study.Ìý ÌýOpen J Nurs. 2022;12(1):70-102. doi:
76.Mansour
ÌýH, Abu Sharour
ÌýL. ÌýResults of survey on perception of patient safety culture among emergency nurses in Jordan: influence of burnout, job satisfaction, turnover intention, and workload.Ìý ÌýJ Healthc Qual Res. 2021;36(6):370-377. doi:
77.Melnyk
ÌýBM, Tan
ÌýA, Hsieh
ÌýAP,
Ìýet al. ÌýCritical care nurses’ physical and mental health, worksite wellness support, and medical errors.Ìý ÌýAm J Crit Care. 2021;30(3):176-184. doi:
78.Mohammadi
ÌýM, Peyrovi
ÌýH, Mahmoodi
ÌýM. ÌýThe relationship between professional quality of life and caring ability in critical care nurses.Ìý ÌýDimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36(5):273-277. doi:
79.Mohr
ÌýDC, Swamy
ÌýL, Wong
ÌýES, Mealer
ÌýM, Moss
ÌýM, Rinne
ÌýST. ÌýCritical care nurse burnout in Veterans Health Administration: relation to clinician and patient outcomes.Ìý ÌýAm J Crit Care. 2021;30(6):435-442. doi:
80.Montgomery
ÌýAP, Azuero
ÌýA, Baernholdt
ÌýM,
Ìýet al. ÌýNurse burnout predicts self-reported medication administration errors in acute care hospitals.Ìý ÌýJ Healthc Qual. 2021;43(1):13-23. doi:
81.Montgomery
ÌýAP, Patrician
ÌýPA, Azuero
ÌýA. ÌýNurse burnout syndrome and work environment impact patient safety grade.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Care Qual. 2022;37(1):87-93. doi:
82.Nantsupawat
ÌýA, Nantsupawat
ÌýR, Kunaviktikul
ÌýW, Turale
ÌýS, Poghosyan
ÌýL. ÌýNurse burnout, nurse-reported quality of care, and patient outcomes in Thai hospitals.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Scholarsh. 2016;48(1):83-90. doi:
83.Nantsupawat
ÌýA, Wichaikhum
ÌýOA, Abhicharttibutra
ÌýK, Sadarangani
ÌýT, Poghosyan
ÌýL. ÌýThe relationship between nurse burnout, missed nursing care, and care quality following COVID-19 pandemic.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Nurs. 2023;32(15-16):5076-5083. doi:
84.Poghosyan
ÌýL, Clarke
ÌýSP, Finlayson
ÌýM, Aiken
ÌýLH. ÌýNurse burnout and quality of care: cross-national investigation in six countries.Ìý ÌýRes Nurs Health. 2010;33(4):288-298. doi:
85.Prapanjaroensin
ÌýA. ÌýInvestigating the Relationship Between Nurse Burnout and Self-Reported Medication Administration Errors in Alabama Hospitals. The University of Alabama at Birmingham; 2019.
86.Rainbow
ÌýJG, Drake
ÌýDA, Steege
ÌýLM. ÌýNurse health, work environment, presenteeism and patient safety.Ìý ÌýWest J Nurs Res. 2020;42(5):332-339. doi:
87.Ramanujam
ÌýR, Abrahamson
ÌýK, Anderson
ÌýJG. ÌýInfluence of workplace demands on nurses’ perception of patient safety.Ìý ÌýNurs Health Sci. 2008;10(2):144-150. doi:
88.RÃos-Risquez
ÌýMI, GarcÃa-Izquierdo
ÌýM. ÌýPatient satisfaction, stress and burnout in nursing personnel in emergency departments: a cross-sectional study.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2016;59:60-67. doi:
89.Russell
ÌýK. ÌýPerceptions of burnout, its prevention, and its effect on patient care as described by oncology nurses in the hospital setting.Ìý ÌýOncol Nurs Forum. 2016;43(1):103-109. doi:
90.Ryu
ÌýIS, Shim
ÌýJ. ÌýThe influence of burnout on patient safety management activities of shift nurses: the mediating effect of compassion satisfaction.Ìý ÌýInt J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12210. doi:
91.Schlak
ÌýAE, Aiken
ÌýLH, Chittams
ÌýJ, Poghosyan
ÌýL, McHugh
ÌýM. ÌýLeveraging the work environment to minimize the negative impact of nurse burnout on patient outcomes.Ìý ÌýInt J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):610. doi:
92.Schmidt
ÌýSG, Dichter
ÌýMN, Bartholomeyczik
ÌýS, Hasselhorn
ÌýHM. ÌýThe satisfaction with the quality of dementia care and the health, burnout and work ability of nurses: a longitudinal analysis of 50 German nursing homes.Ìý ÌýGeriatr Nurs. 2014;35(1):42-46. doi:
93.Soósová
ÌýMS. ÌýAssociation between nurses’ burnout, hospital patient safety climate and quality of nursing care.Ìý ÌýCent Eur J Nurs Midw. 2021;12(1):245-256. doi:
94.Squires
ÌýM, Tourangeau
ÌýA, Spence Laschinger
ÌýHK, Doran
ÌýD. ÌýThe link between leadership and safety outcomes in hospitals.Ìý ÌýJ Nurs Manag. 2010;18(8):914-925. doi:
95.Teng
ÌýCI, Shyu
ÌýYIL, Chiou
ÌýWK, Fan
ÌýHC, Lam
ÌýSM. ÌýInteractive effects of nurse-experienced time pressure and burnout on patient safety: a cross-sectional survey.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(11):1442-1450. doi:
96.Vahey
ÌýDC, Aiken
ÌýLH, Sloane
ÌýDM, Clarke
ÌýSP, Vargas
ÌýD. ÌýNurse burnout and patient satisfaction.Ìý ÌýMed Care. 2004;42(2)(suppl):II57-II66. doi:
97.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Clarke
ÌýS, Roelant
ÌýE, Meulemans
ÌýH, Van de Heyning
ÌýP. ÌýImpacts of unit-level nurse practice environment and burnout on nurse-reported outcomes: a multilevel modelling approach.Ìý ÌýJ Clin Nurs. 2010;19(11-12):1664-1674. doi:
98.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Clarke
ÌýS, Willems
ÌýR, Mondelaers
ÌýM. ÌýNurse practice environment, workload, burnout, job outcomes, and quality of care in psychiatric hospitals: a structural equation model approach.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2013;69(7):1515-1524. doi:
99.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Clarke
ÌýS, Wouters
ÌýK, Franck
ÌýE, Willems
ÌýR, Mondelaers
ÌýM. ÌýImpacts of unit-level nurse practice environment, workload and burnout on nurse-reported outcomes in psychiatric hospitals: a multilevel modelling approach.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(3):357-365. doi:
100.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Dilles
ÌýT, Wouters
ÌýK, Rompaey
ÌýBV. ÌýPractice environment, work characteristics and levels of burnout as predictors of nurse reported job outcomes, quality of care and patient adverse events: a study across residential aged care services.Ìý ÌýOpen J Nurs. 2014;04(5):343-355. doi:
101.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Kowalski
ÌýC, Weeks
ÌýSM, Van Heusden
ÌýD, Clarke
ÌýSP. ÌýThe relationship between nurse practice environment, nurse work characteristics, burnout and job outcome and quality of nursing care: a cross-sectional survey.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(12):1667-1677. doi:
102.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Meulemans
ÌýH, Clarke
ÌýS, Vermeyen
ÌýK, Van de Heyning
ÌýP. ÌýHospital nurse practice environment, burnout, job outcomes and quality of care: test of a structural equation model.Ìý ÌýJ Adv Nurs. 2009;65(10):2175-2185. doi:
103.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Peremans
ÌýL, Van Heusden
ÌýD,
Ìýet al. ÌýPredictors of burnout, work engagement and nurse reported job outcomes and quality of care: a mixed method study.Ìý ÌýBMC Nurs. 2017;16(1):5. doi:
104.Van Bogaert
ÌýP, Timmermans
ÌýO, Weeks
ÌýSM, van Heusden
ÌýD, Wouters
ÌýK, Franck
ÌýE. ÌýNursing unit teams matter: impact of unit-level nurse practice environment, nurse work characteristics, and burnout on nurse reported job outcomes, and quality of care, and patient adverse events–a cross-sectional survey.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(8):1123-1134. doi:
105.Van Wyk
ÌýA. ÌýThe Relationship Between Burnout and the Safety and Quality of Patient Care in Private Critical Care Units in Gauteng Province. North-West University; 2010.
106.Vifladt
ÌýA, Simonsen
ÌýBO, Lydersen
ÌýS, Farup
ÌýPG. ÌýThe association between patient safety culture and burnout and sense of coherence: a cross-sectional study in restructured and not restructured intensive care units.Ìý ÌýIntensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016;36:26-34. doi:
107.Vitale
ÌýE, Cesano
ÌýE, Germini
ÌýF. ÌýCorrelations of burnout and healthcare safety perceptions among Italian nurses.Ìý ÌýActa Biomed. 2020;91(4):e2020117. doi:
108.Vogus
ÌýTJ, Cooil
ÌýB, Sitterding
ÌýM, Everett
ÌýLQ. ÌýSafety organizing, emotional exhaustion, and turnover in hospital nursing units.Ìý ÌýMed Care. 2014;52(10):870-876. doi:
109.White
ÌýEM, Aiken
ÌýLH, McHugh
ÌýMD. ÌýRegistered nurse burnout, job dissatisfaction, and missed care in nursing homes.Ìý ÌýJ Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(10):2065-2071. doi:
110.You
ÌýLM, Aiken
ÌýLH, Sloane
ÌýDM,
Ìýet al. ÌýHospital nursing, care quality, and patient satisfaction: cross-sectional surveys of nurses and patients in hospitals in China and Europe.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(2):154-161. doi:
111.Zaghini
ÌýF, Fiorini
ÌýJ, Piredda
ÌýM, Fida
ÌýR, Sili
ÌýA. ÌýThe relationship between nurse managers’ leadership style and patients’ perception of the quality of the care provided by nurses: cross sectional survey.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2020;101:103446. doi:
112.Zaki
ÌýSM, Elsayed
ÌýLA, Ibrahim
ÌýMM. ÌýFactors contributing to burnout among Saudi nurses and their effect on patients’ satisfaction at Makkah Al-Mukaramah hospitals.Ìý ÌýLife Sci J. 2016;13(5):73-88.
113.Zander
ÌýB, Dobler
ÌýL, Busse
ÌýR. ÌýThe introduction of DRG funding and hospital nurses’ changing perceptions of their practice environment, quality of care and satisfaction: comparison of cross-sectional surveys over a 10-year period.Ìý ÌýInt J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(2):219-229. doi:
114.Mathur
ÌýMB. ÌýAssessing robustness to worst case publication bias using a simple subset meta-analysis.Ìý Ìýµþ²Ñ´³. 2024;384:e076851. doi:
115.Mathur
ÌýMB, VanderWeele
ÌýTJ. ÌýRobust metrics and sensitivity analyses for meta-analyses of heterogeneous effects.Ìý Ìý·¡±è¾±»å±ð³¾¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 2020;31(3):356-358. doi:
116.Rotenstein
ÌýLS, Torre
ÌýM, Ramos
ÌýMA,
Ìýet al. ÌýPrevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic review.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡. 2018;320(11):1131-1150. doi:
117.Aiken
ÌýLH, Clarke
ÌýSP, Cheung
ÌýRB, Sloane
ÌýDM, Silber
ÌýJH. ÌýEducational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality.Ìý Ìý´³´¡²Ñ´¡. 2003;290(12):1617-1623. doi:
118.Cohen
ÌýC, Pignata
ÌýS, Bezak
ÌýE, Tie
ÌýM, Childs
ÌýJ. ÌýWorkplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review.Ìý Ìýµþ²Ñ´³ Open. 2023;13(6):e071203. doi:
119.Shanafelt
ÌýT, Farley
ÌýH, Wang
ÌýH, Ripp
ÌýJ; CHARM CWO Network. ÌýResponsibilities and job characteristics of health care chief wellness officers in the United States.Ìý ÌýMayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(11):2563-2566. doi:
120.Longo
ÌýBA, Schmaltz
ÌýSP, Williams
ÌýSC, Shanafelt
ÌýTD, Sinsky
ÌýCA, Baker
ÌýDW. ÌýClinician well-being assessment and interventions in joint commission-accredited hospitals and federally qualified health centers.Ìý ÌýJt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023;49(10):511-520. doi:
121.Health worker burnout. Office of the US Surgeon General, US Dept of Health and Human Services. 2024. Accessed February 24, 2024.
122.Action Collaborative on Clinician Well-Being and Resilience. National Academy of Sciences. 2017. Accessed March 26, 2024.
123.President Biden signs Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes’ Foundation signature bill into law. Dr. Lorna Breen Heroes’ Foundation. 2022. Accessed February 24, 2024.
124.Institute of Medicine, ed. ÌýCrossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press; 2001.