Key PointsQuestion听
Is altered fetal brain development in the setting of maternal psychological distress associated with infant neurodevelopment?
Findings听
In this cohort study of 97 mother-infant dyads who underwent 184 fetal magnetic resonance imaging studies (87 participants with 2 fetal studies each) and infant neurodevelopmental testing at 18 months, prenatal maternal stress was negatively associated with infant cognitive outcome, and this association was mediated by fetal left hippocampal volume. The study also found that increased fetal cortical local gyrification index and sulcal depth under elevated prenatal maternal distress were associated with decreased infant social-emotional scores measured by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development and competence scores measured by Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment.
Meaning听
These findings suggest that altered in vivo fetal brain development in the setting of elevated prenatal maternal psychological distress may be associated with adverse neurodevelopment.
Importance听
Prenatal maternal psychological distress is associated with disturbances in fetal brain development. However, the association between altered fetal brain development, prenatal maternal psychological distress, and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes is unknown.
Objective听
To determine the association of fetal brain development using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumes, cortical folding, and metabolites in the setting of maternal psychological distress with infant 18-month neurodevelopment.
Design, Setting, and Participants听
Healthy mother-infant dyads were prospectively recruited into a longitudinal observational cohort study from January 2016 to October 2020 at Children鈥檚 National Hospital in Washington, DC. Data analysis was performed from January 2016 to July 2021.
Exposures听
Prenatal maternal stress, anxiety, and depression.
Main Outcomes and Measures听
Prenatal maternal stress, anxiety, and depression were measured using validated self-report questionnaires. Fetal brain volumes and cortical folding were measured from 3-dimensional, reconstructed T2-weighted MRI scans. Fetal brain creatine and choline were quantified using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Infant neurodevelopment at 18 months was measured using Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development III and Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment. The parenting stress in the parent-child dyad was measured using the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form at 18-month testing.
Results听
The cohort consisted of 97 mother-infant dyads (mean [SD] maternal age, 34.79 [5.64] years) who underwent 184 fetal MRI visits (87 participants with 2 fetal studies each) with maternal psychological distress measures between 24 and 40 gestational weeks and completed follow-up infant neurodevelopmental testing. Prenatal maternal stress was negatively associated with infant cognitive performance (尾鈥�=鈥夆垝0.51; 95% CI, 鈭�0.92 to 鈭�0.09; P鈥�=鈥�.01), and this association was mediated by fetal left hippocampal volume. In addition, prenatal maternal anxiety, stress, and depression were positively associated with all parenting stress measures at 18-month testing. Finally, fetal cortical local gyrification index and sulcal depth were negatively associated with infant social-emotional performance (local gyrification index: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝54.62; 95% CI, 鈭�85.05 to 鈭�24.19; P鈥�<鈥�.001; sulcal depth: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝14.22; 95% CI, 鈭�23.59 to 鈭�4.85; P鈥�=鈥�.002) and competence scores (local gyrification index: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝24.01; 95% CI, 鈭�40.34 to 鈭�7.69; P鈥�=鈥�.003; sulcal depth: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝7.53; 95% CI, 鈭�11.73 to 鈭�3.32; P鈥�&濒迟;鈥�.001).
Conclusions and Relevance听
In this cohort study of 97 mother-infant dyads, fetal cortical local gyrification index and sulcal depth were associated with infant 18-month social-emotional and competence outcomes, and fetal left hippocampal volume mediated the association between prenatal maternal stress and infant cognitive outcome. These findings suggest that altered prenatal brain development in the setting of elevated maternal distress has adverse infant sociocognitive outcomes, and identifying early biomarkers associated with long-term neurodevelopment may assist in early targeted interventions.
Stress-related symptoms are now recognized as the most common complication of pregnancy, affecting approximately 1 of every 4 women, even those with healthy pregnancies and high socioeconomic status.1 Prenatal maternal stress exposure has been shown to have enduring consequences on brain development in the offspring, including altered regional brain volumetric growth (eg, amygdala, hippocampal, cerebellar, and cortical gray matter volumes), cortical folding, metabolism, microstructure, and functional connectivity,1-13 as well as long-term neurodevelopmental impairments (eg, cognitive, language, learning, and psychiatric dysfunctions).14-17
Neurodevelopmental problems in the setting of elevated maternal stress are thought to be associated with abnormal brain structure and circuitry.18,19 Notably, disaster-related prenatal maternal stress has been associated with larger amygdala volumes in children at 11 years old, and amygdala volume mediated the association between prenatal maternal stress and children鈥檚 externalizing problems.20 Similarly, maternal stress hormone (ie, cortisol) levels at early gestation have been associated with a larger right amygdala volume in girls at age 7 years, and amygdala volume mediated the association between prenatal maternal cortisol and children鈥檚 affective problems.8 In addition, prenatal maternal stress was associated with both reduced cortical thickness in children at age 7 years and elevated depressive symptoms at follow-up age 12 years, and children鈥檚 cortical thickness was associated with later depressive symptoms,21 suggesting a role of altered cortical thickness in the setting of prenatal maternal stress and adolescent depressive symptoms. Although a growing body of evidence links prenatal maternal stress exposure to altered brain growth and long-term neurodevelopment in the offspring, measures of in vivo fetal brain development using advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been very limited.
Exploring in utero fetal brain development is challenging because of fetal and maternal motion, imaging artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio issues, changes in morphology (due to brain growth), and changes in image intensity (due to myelination and cortical maturation). Recently, advances in in utero MRI techniques1,3,22,23 enabled us to detect early alterations in fetal brain development under stress exposure, which may forecast later neurodevelopmental problems at an early age.18 In a previous study,1 we reported for the first time that maternal stress, anxiety, or depression, even if not reaching the severity of a mental disorder, was associated with adverse fetal brain development, including impaired fetal brain choline and creatine levels and hippocampal growth, as well as accelerated cortical folding. However, it is unknown whether and how these findings of altered in vivo fetal brain development are associated with subsequent infant neurodevelopment. In this study, we expand on our prior work1 by (1) examining the association between prenatal maternal psychological distress (ie, stress, anxiety, and depression that did not reach the severity of a mental disorder1,24) and infant 18-month neurodevelopment; (2) examining the association between fetal brain development (ie, volumetric, cortical folding, and metabolic measures) and infant 18-month neurodevelopment; and (3) determining whether fetal brain development mediates the association between prenatal maternal psychological distress and infant neurodevelopment outcomes.
We prospectively recruited pregnant women and their fetuses into a longitudinal, observational cohort study between January 2016 and October 2020. Pregnant women were healthy volunteers from low-risk obstetric clinics. Women were eligible if medical record reviews confirmed a normal prenatal medical history, without chronic or pregnancy-induced illnesses, normal screening serum values, and normal fetal ultrasonography and fetal biometry studies. We excluded fetuses with known or suspected congenital infection, dysgenetic lesions or dysmorphic features, or genetic abnormalities. We also excluded pregnant women with (1) chronic medical conditions identified at the time of screening through the medical record or by self-report of existing medical conditions during each study visit (eg, autoimmune, genetic, metabolic, or psychiatric disorders); (2) pregnancy-related complications; (3) multiple pregnancies; (4) self-reported drug abuse, smoking, and alcohol use; (5) medications for chronic conditions; and (6) contraindications to MRI. Participants identified their race from a list of options defined on the basis of the information in US Census. Race was assessed in this study to help to understand underlying contributing factors. Fetal brain MRI studies were scheduled at 2 time points between 24 and 40 weeks of gestation.
This is a follow-up study of our previous research.1 Ninety-two of 97 participants (95%) in the current study were from our previous report1 who completed the follow-up infant 18-month neurodevelopmental testing. In our previous publication,1 we reported significant associations between maternal psychological distress and specific fetal MRI-based brain measures, including volumetric growth of the hippocampus, cortical folding metrics (local gyrification index and sulcal depth), and brain metabolic measures (creatine and choline levels). We now sought to determine the association between these fetal brain measures and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 months.
This study was approved by the institutional review board at Children鈥檚 National Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment. We followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology () reporting guideline.
Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress
Psychometrically sound questionnaires measuring stress, anxiety, and depression were used and completed on the same day as each fetal MRI visit. The Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10, range, 0-40) assesses the self-reported level of stress in the prior month.25 Total scores of 15 or higher have been suggested as indicative of elevated maternal stress.26,27 The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory is composed of 2 self-reported measures of anxiety: state anxiety (SSAI) and trait anxiety (STAI).28 Both measures are composed of 20 items (range, 20-80). SSAI and STAI scores of 40 or higher are suggestive of presence of anxiety.29,30 The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; range, 0-30) screens depression symptoms in pregnant and postpartum women.31,32 EPDS scores of 10 or higher are suggestive of elevated depression.33,34 In this study, mothers who endorsed 1 or more measure of stress, anxiety, or depression (measured score鈥塯reater than or equal to cutoff score) were referred to as positive for maternal psychological distress.
MRI Acquisition and Processing
As reported in our previous study,1 fetal brain T2-weighted MRI was performed using a 1.5-Tesla magnet (GE Discovery MR450) and an 8-channel receiver coil at 2 time points between 24 and 40 weeks of gestation. The scanning protocol included multiplanar, single-shot, fast spin-echo acquisitions (repetition time, 1100 ms; echo time, 160 ms; flip angle, 90掳; field of view, 32 cm; matrix, 256鈥壝椻��192; 2-mm slice thickness). The acquisition time was 2 to 3 minutes for each plane. Participants were free-breathing during the scan. After acquiring the 2-dimensional (2D) brain slices from axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, a state-of-the-art motion correction technique35 that has been previously validated was used to correct the fetal brain motion and reconstruct the images from 2D slices of all 3 planes to a high-resolution 3-dimensional (3D) image (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). After that, the reconstructed brains were spatially oriented to the brain atlas36 using landmark-based rigid registration in the IRTK package.37 The oriented images with the resolution of 0.86鈥壝椻��0.86鈥壝椻��0.86 mm3 were used to measure brain volume and cortical folding. For 1H鈥搈agnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS), a spectral voxel was placed in the center of the fetal brain to measure brain metabolites (Figure 1). More details on 1H-MRS acquisition have been reported in our previous study.1
Brain Volume, Cortical Folding, and Metabolism
Left and right hippocampi were manually delineated on reconstructed T2-weighted MR images (Figure 2) according to previously validated anatomical criteria.38,39 An experienced neuroradiologist (G.V.) assisted with anatomical localization of the hippocampi on MR images. The manual segmentation was performed by the same rater (Y.W.), and 20% of scans were randomly selected and segmented by another experienced rater (K.K.). Interrater reliabilities using intraclass correlation coefficient were higher than 0.95. The cortical folding measures, including local gyrification index40 and sulcal depth,41 were calculated on the inner surface of cortical gray matter.1 The local gyrification index was calculated as the ratio between the cortical surface area at each vertex and the corresponding area on the cerebral hull surface,40 and sulcal depth was measured as the distance from each vertex on the cortical surface to the nearest point on the cerebral hull surface.41 For 1H-MRS data, creatine and choline measured with Cramer-Rao lower bounds less than 20% from the fetal brain were used in the analysis.1
Infant Neurodevelopmental Testing
Measures of infant 18-month neurodevelopmental status were performed by an examiner (K.E.) blinded to clinical findings. Neurodevelopmental assessments were conducted using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III)42 and the Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (ITSEA).43 The BSID-III evaluates cognitive, language, and motor functioning and was performed by a licensed psychologist (K.E.). The BSID-III Social-Emotional Scale measures adaptive behavior and social-emotional development via parent-completed measure. The normalized mean (SD) of each composite score is 100鈥�(15). A mean score less than 85 indicates a developmental delay.44 The ITSEA is a parent-completed measure that evaluates child social-emotional and/or behavioral problems and delays in competence.45 The ITSEA assesses 4 domains: externalizing (activity/impulsivity, aggression/defiance, and peer aggression), internalizing (depression/withdrawal, general anxiety, separation distress, and inhibition to novelty), dysregulation (negative emotionality, sleep, eating, and sensory sensitivity), and competence (compliance, attention, mastery, motivation, imitation/play, empathy, and prosocial peer relations).43,46 Externalizing, internalizing, dysregulation scores of 65 or higher and competence domain scores of 35 or lower indicate a deficit or delay.46
Parenting Stress at 18 Months
The Parenting Stress Index鈥揝hort Form (PSI-SF)47 was used to evaluate the degree of stress in the parent-child dyad at 18-month testing. The PSI-SF is a self-reported measure of parenting stress that includes 3 subscales: parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child.47,48 Each subscale (range, 12-60) consists of 12 items rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The PSI-SF also gives a defensive responding scale (7 items from the parental distress scale; range, 7-35) and a total stress scale (range, 36-180) that is a sum of parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and difficult child.47,48 The PSI-SF has been validated to be effective and appropriate for measuring stress in the parent-child system in a variety of populations.49-53
Analyses were performed using SAS statistical software version 9.3 (SAS Institute) and MATLAB statistical software version R2018b (MathWorks). Data analysis was performed from January 2016 to July 2021. Characteristics of the study sample in negative vs positive prenatal maternal psychological distress were compared using either t test or Fisher exact test, where appropriate. Infant neurodevelopmental scores in women positive on 1 or more prenatal distress measures were compared using analysis of covariance, controlling for possible confounders including maternal education and employment,54 PSI-SF total stress scale at 18 months, and neurodevelopmental assessment during COVID-19 pandemic (yes or no). Generalized estimating equations (GEEs), which allow multiple measurements for each participant, were used to measure associations between prenatal maternal psychological distress scores and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes, controlling for gestational age (GA) at the fetal visit, maternal education and employment, PSI-SF total stress scale, and neurodevelopmental assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic (yes or no). An unstructured correlation assumption was used to address the possible correlation within participants due to multiple measurements. GEE was used to determine the associations between prenatal maternal psychological distress scores and PSI-SF parenting stress scales measured at 18 months, controlling for GA at fetal visit, maternal education and employment, and neurodevelopmental assessment during COVID-19 pandemic (yes or no). GEE was also used to measure associations between fetal brain measures (volume, cortical folding, and metabolites) and infant neurodevelopmental outcomes, adjusting for prenatal maternal psychological distress status (positive or negative), GA at fetal visit, maternal education, maternal employment, PSI-SF total stress scale at 18 months, and neurodevelopmental assessment during COVID-19 pandemic (yes or no). The prenatal maternal psychological distress status was derived by combining the individual positive/negative distress measurements of participants (SSAI, STAI, PSS, and EPDS). In the combined measurement, participants were defined as positive if they had 1 or more positive individual distress measurements; otherwise, they were defined as negative. Additional adjustments for maternal body mass index, age, race, GA at birth, and birth weight were considered, with no material effect on estimates. The significance level of multiple testing was adjusted using the false discovery rate method,55 and adjusted 2-sided P鈥夆墹鈥�.05 was considered significant. Causal mediation analyses56 were performed to assess whether fetal brain development mediated the association between prenatal maternal distress scores and infant neurodevelopment at 18 months. The direct effect of prenatal maternal distress on infant neurodevelopment and the indirect (mediating) effect of prenatal maternal distress on infant neurodevelopment through fetal brain volumes were evaluated using the following 3 models: model 1, Y鈥�=鈥�i1鈥�+鈥坝�1X鈥�+鈥坝�1C1鈥�+鈥�e1, where 尾1 is the total effect of X on Y; model 2, M鈥�=鈥�i2+鈥坝�2X鈥�+鈥坝�2C2鈥�+鈥�e2, where 尾2 tests the association between X and the mediator M; and model 3, Y鈥�=鈥�i3鈥�+鈥坝�3X鈥�+鈥坝�4M鈥�+鈥坝�3C1+e3, where 尾3 is the direct effect of X on Y (X鈥�=鈥塸renatal maternal distress score, Y鈥�=鈥塱nfant neurodevelopment outcome, and M鈥�=鈥塮etal brain volume). C1 denotes the vector of confounding factors that include GA at the fetal visit, maternal education, maternal employment, PSI-SF total stress scale at 18 months, and neurodevelopmental assessment during COVID-19 pandemic (yes or no). C2 is a vector of confounding factors in model 2.1 If X and M and have no association in model 2, there is no ground for mediation. The mediating effect of X on Y through mediator M is the total effect in model 1 minus the direct effect in model 3 (尾1鈥�鈭掆赌坝�3). Bootstrapping (1000 samples) was used to estimate bias-corrected 95% CIs, and a significant mediating effect was defined as a bootstrapped 95% CI that did not include 0.
Our cohort consisted of 97 mother-fetus dyads (49 [51%] male fetuses and 48 [49%] female fetuses) who underwent 184 fetal MRI visits (87 participants with 2 fetal studies each) with maternal psychological distress measures between 24 and 40 gestational weeks and completed follow-up infant neurodevelopmental testing at 18 months. We initially enrolled 131 study participants; however, 1 participant was excluded because of an abnormal fetal MRI finding (ie, intraventricular hemorrhage). For the remaining participants, 101 completed both the prenatal MRI visits and follow-up infant neurodevelopmental testing. Four of 101 participants with missing prenatal maternal distress questionnaires were excluded. Ten of the remaining 97 participants completed the first but not the second MRI visit, resulting in 184 fetal MRI studies included in the analyses. Data from 13% of T2-weighted scans and 17% of 1H-MRS were not usable because of fetal motion. For T2-weighted MRI scans, left and right hippocampi were successfully measured on 92 fetuses (153 scans), and cortical folding was successfully measured on 80 fetuses (117 scans). For 1H-MRS scans, fetal brain choline and creatine levels were successfully analyzed on 84 fetuses (153 scans). All conventional fetal MRI scans were interpreted as structurally normal by an experienced fetal neuroradiologist (G.V.). The conventional MRI findings were shared with the study participants. The mean (SD) GA was 28.12 (2.41) weeks at the first fetal MRI and 35.95 (1.70) weeks at the second fetal MRI. The mean (SD) age at neurodevelopment testing was 19.68 (4.54) months. The mean (SD) maternal age was 34.79 (5.64) years. Ninety-one women (94%) attended college and 84 (87%) had professional employment. For maternal race, 7 women (7%) were Asian/Pacific Islander, 10 (10%) were Hispanic, 15 (15%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 60 (62%) were non-Hispanic White. All fetal MRI and prenatal maternal distress measures were performed before May 2019. Fourteen of our 97 participants completed their infant neurodevelopmental testing since the first case of COVID-19 was reported in the US on January 20, 2020. Participant characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress Measures
Mean (SD) maternal anxiety, stress, and depression scores were 29.6鈥�(8.9) for SSAI, 30.7鈥�(8.6) for STAI, 10.7鈥�(5.8) for PSS, and 4.3鈥�(3.8) for EPDS. The distress scores across GA are shown in eFigure 2 in the Supplement. Of the 97 pregnant women, 28 (29%) were positive (measured score鈥塯reater than or equal to the鈥塩utoff score) for stress, 29 (30%) for anxiety (22 [23%] for state anxiety and 19 [20%] for trait anxiety), and 10 (10%) for depression. Thirty-five women (36%) tested positive for stress, anxiety, or depression. For the 35 women who tested positive on distress measures (ie, SSAI, STAI, PSS, or EPDS), 12 (34%) of them were positive on 1 distress measure, 8 (23%) on 2 measures, 9 (26%) on 3 measures, and 6 (17%) on all 4 measures (Table 1).
Fetal Brain Volumes, Cortical Folding, and Metabolites
Mean (SD) volumes of left and right hippocampi were 0.52鈥�(0.18) cm3 and 0.56鈥�(0.18) cm3, respectively. Mean (SD) values of cortical folding index and sulcal depth were 1.29鈥�(0.20) and 1.62鈥�(0.63) mm, respectively. Mean (SD) fetal brain choline and creatine levels were 2.39鈥�(0.34) IU and 2.94鈥�(0.68) IU, respectively.
Infant Neurodevelopmental Results and Parenting Stress Scales
The mean (SD) scores for the BSID-III were 108 (16) for cognitive, 102 (13) for language, 105 (10) for motor, 103 (15) for adaptive, and 113 (21) for social-emotional domains. Of the 97 infants, delayed development (score <85) was seen in 3 infants (3%) for cognitive, 6 infants (6%) for language, 1 infant (1%) for motor, 8 infants (8%) for adaptive, and 6 infants (6%) for social-emotional domains. The mean (SD) scores for ITSEA were 48 (8) for externalizing, 46 (10) for internalizing, 41 (11) for dysregulation, and 51 (10) for competence domains. Of the 97 infants, 4 (4%) had externalizing problems, 3 (3%) had internalizing problems, and 2 (2%) had dysregulation problems (measured score 鈮�65); 3 infants (3%) had delays in the competence domain (measured score 鈮�35). The mean (SD) scores for PSI-SF were 12 (4) for defensive responding, 21 (7) for parental distress, 16 (5) for parent-child dysfunctional interaction, 20 (6) for difficult child, and 56 (16) for total stress domains.
Associations Between Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress and Infant Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
Prenatal maternal stress was negatively associated with infant cognitive performance (尾鈥�=鈥夆垝0.51; 95% CI, 鈭�0.92 to 鈭�0.09; P鈥�=鈥�.01) (Table 2). We further assessed whether infant neurodevelopment outcomes would differ in participants who tested positive on 1 vs multiple prenatal distress measures (SSAI, STAI, PSS, and/or EPDS). There was no significant difference in neurodevelopment outcomes among infants born to women who were positive on 1 vs multiple distress measures (eTable 1 in the Supplement). Therefore, we combined the participants with any (鈮�1) positive distress measure and referred to them as positive for maternal psychological distress.
Associations Between Prenatal Maternal Psychological Distress and Parenting Stress at 18-Month Testing
Prenatal maternal trait anxiety, stress, and depression were positively associated with all PSI-SF scales at 18-month testing (Table 2). Significant associations between prenatal distress and PSI-SF outcomes were noted in defensive responding (STAI: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.15; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.23; PSS: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.20; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.31; EPDS: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.13; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.21), parental distress (STAI: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.26; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.38; PSS: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.35; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.52; EPDS: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.28; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.42), parental-child dysfunction interaction (EPDS: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.22; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.34), and total stress (STAI: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.49; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.74; PSS: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.65; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.01; EPDS: 尾鈥�=鈥�0.70; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.05) (P鈥�<鈥�.001 for all).
Associations Between Fetal Brain Measures and Infant Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
Fetal cortical local gyrification index and sulcal depth were negatively associated with infant social-emotional performance (local gyrification index: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝54.62; 95% CI, 鈭�85.05 to 鈭�24.19; P鈥�<鈥�.001; sulcal depth: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝14.22; 95% CI, 鈭�23.59 to 鈭�4.85; P鈥�=鈥�.002) and competence scores (local gyrification index: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝24.01; 95% CI, 鈭�40.34 to 鈭�7.69; P鈥�=鈥�.003; sulcal depth: 尾鈥�=鈥夆垝7.53, 95% CI, 鈭�11.73 to 鈭�3.32; P鈥�<鈥�.001) (Table 3). For fetal brain metabolic measures, choline and creatine levels were positively associated with infant adaptive behaviors (choline: 尾鈥�=鈥�2.60; 95% CI, 0.40 to 4.79; P鈥�=鈥�.02; creatine: 尾鈥�=鈥�1.58; 95% CI, 0.08 to 3.08; P鈥�=鈥�.03) (Table 3), but these associations were no longer significant after adjusting for multiple testing. Because prenatal maternal stress was negatively associated with infant cognitive performance (Table 2), we performed causal mediation analysis to measure whether this association was mediated by any fetal brain measure. We found that fetal left hippocampal volume accounted for 11% of the total prenatal maternal stress and infant cognitive outcome association (尾鈥�=鈥夆垝0.11; bootstrapped 95% CI, 鈭�0.35 to 鈭�0.0002) (eTable 2 in the Supplement).
In this longitudinal, prospective, observational cohort study, we found that prenatal maternal stress was inversely associated with infant cognitive outcome, and this association was mediated by fetal left hippocampal volume. In addition, prenatal maternal stress, anxiety, and depression were positively associated with parenting stress scores at 18-month testing. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that altered human fetal cortical folding may be associated with infant neurodevelopment. Specifically, fetal cortical local gyrification index and sulcal depth were negatively associated with infant social-emotional and competence performance.
The exact incidence of mental health disturbances in pregnant women is not known but is likely underestimated. In this study, all pregnant participants were healthy and had low-risk pregnancies, most were well educated and employed, and most were living in areas (Washington, DC) with good access to health care. Despite these seemingly favorable conditions, 36% of participants exceeded the positivity threshold for stress, anxiety, and/or depression. This is in keeping with recent studies57-59 reporting prenatal depression and anxiety in up to 18.4% and 25.3%, respectively, of women in high-income countries and of middle-to-high socioeconomic status. Furthermore, we found that prenatal maternal stress, depression, and anxiety were correlated with all PSI-SF scores at 18-month testing. This finding suggests that prenatal maternal distress may not be transient but persistent across the postnatal period with subsequent influences on both the parent-child interaction and infant self-regulation.
In addition, we found that prenatal maternal stress, even if not reaching the severity of a mental disorder, was associated with decreased infant cognitive performance. This finding is in keeping with results of previous studies14-16,60,61 showing cognitive impairments in children following early exposure to maternal stress. In particular, our findings suggest that this association may be partially mediated by fetal left hippocampal volume. This is supported by our previous study that maternal stress decreased fetal left hippocampal volume,1 as well as other studies that the hippocampal subregions were related to certain cognitive functions.62,63 The standardized assessment of infant cognitive performance further supports this mediation finding. Our bilateral asymmetrical finding may be explained by different functions and growth rates of left and right hippocampus.1,38,64 Our findings suggest that although the prevalence of prenatal maternal distress in our cohort may not be as high as in the high-risk population,3,65 its association with infant outcomes cannot be ignored.
Importantly, we found that increased fetal cortical gyrification index and sulcal depth were associated with decreased infant social-emotional and competence performance. Increased cortical gyrification has been suggested in children with dyslexia and autism,66,67 and sulcal depth has been associated with the severity of impaired performance on working memory and executive function in adults with schizophrenia.68 Our earlier study suggested that prenatal maternal psychological distress increased fetal cortical gyrification index and sulcal depth.1 The current study extends our previous findings and suggests a critical role for disturbances in emerging fetal cerebral cortical folding development in mediating the association between prenatal maternal distress and neurodevelopmental problems that later manifest in infancy.
In addition, we found positive associations between fetal brain choline and creatine levels and infant adaptive behaviors, although these associations were not significant after adjusting for multiple testing. Animal studies69 have suggested that there are associations between choline status and attention and memory, and choline supplementation during pregnancy improves cognitive and neurological function in offspring. In human studies,70 maternal plasma choline level in the second trimester was positively associated with cognitive development in 18-month-old infants. Levels of brain creatine have been linked to cognitive and emotional processing in infancy, and alterations in the brain creatine pathway have been related to psychiatric disorders.71 In addition, brain metabolites in healthy neonates have been associated with learning and memory in infants at 4 months.72 Our current study suggests that increased in utero fetal brain choline and creatine levels, in the setting of decreased prenatal maternal depression and stress reported in our previous study,1 are likely associated with better infant adaptive performance, which needs to be confirmed in a larger cohort.
These findings are particularly insightful, given the nature of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; reports of increased maternal anxiety, stress, and depression73,74; and the underexplored nexus between elevated maternal distress during the pandemic and the health of the next generation of infants. More than 1 million US infants have been born in the COVID-19 pandemic era, yet we lack knowledge about the influence of pandemic-related maternal distress on infants鈥� long-term neurodevelopment. Our ongoing studies will continue to explore the association between heightened maternal distress amid the pandemic and children鈥檚 lifelong health.
This study has potential limitations. First, maternal distress assessment at certain time points may not fully reflect maternal mental health status for the entire pregnancy. Second, the percentage of women positive for stress, anxiety, and depression will change using different cutoff scores. We chose cutoffs used for pregnant women in both our earlier work1,3 and those of others,26,27,29,30,33,34 but we acknowledge the potential for either false positives or false negatives. Third, in this study, cognitive, language, and motor skills on the Bayley Scales were evaluated by a licensed psychologist. However, infant social-emotional assessments and prenatal maternal psychological distress measures were based on maternal report. Although these maternal questionnaires are widely used in the literature and standardized with established psychometric properties, we acknowledge the possible bias that may exist in parent-reported measures. Fourth, data from 13% of T2-weighted scans and 17% of 1H-MRS images were not usable because of fetal motion; however, our percentage of lost data is similar to that in other fetal studies.75,76 Fifth, participants in our catchment area may not be reflective of other regions. The metropolitan Washington, DC, area is home to a highly educated, low-unemployment workforce, which may have increased access to health care needs not reflective of other geographical areas.
In conclusion, we report that prenatal maternal stress is associated with infant cognitive outcome, and this association is partially mediated by fetal left hippocampal volume. In addition, we report that increased fetal cortical gyrification index and sulcal depth in pregnancies complicated by maternal psychological distress is associated with decreased infant social-emotional and competence performance. Identifying early brain developmental biomarkers may help improve the identification of infants at risk for later neurodevelopmental impairment who might benefit from early targeted interventions.
Accepted for Publication: February 22, 2022.
Published: April 29, 2022. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9244
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. 漏 2022 Wu Y et al. 糖心vlog Open.
Corresponding Author: Catherine Limperopoulos, PhD, Developing Brain Institute, Children鈥檚 National Hospital, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010 (climpero@childrensnational.org).
Author Contributions: Dr Wu had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Wu, Andescavage, Pradhan, Wessel, du Plessis, Limperopoulos.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Wu, Espinosa, Barnett, A. Kapse, Quistorff, Lopez, Andescavage, Pradhan, Lu, K. Kapse, Henderson, Vezina, du Plessis, Limperopoulos.
Drafting of the manuscript: Wu, Barnett, Andescavage, Pradhan, Lu, Henderson.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Wu, Espinosa, A. Kapse, Quistorff, Lopez, Andescavage, Pradhan, Lu, K. Kapse, Vezina, Wessel, du Plessis, Limperopoulos.
Statistical analysis: Wu, Barnett, Andescavage, Lu.
Obtained funding: Limperopoulos.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Wu, Espinosa, A. Kapse, Quistorff, Lopez, Andescavage, Pradhan, K. Kapse, Henderson, Wessel, du Plessis, Limperopoulos.
Supervision: Lu, Vezina, Wessel, du Plessis, Limperopoulos.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01HL116585) and the A. James & Alice B. Clark Foundation.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Additional Contributions: We thank the participants in our study. We also thank our laboratory members for their contributions.
Additional Information: Data can be made available from the corresponding author upon request.
1.Wu
听Y锘�, Lu
听Y-C锘�, Jacobs
听M锘�,
听et al. 听Association of prenatal maternal psychological distress with fetal brain growth, metabolism, and cortical maturation.听锘� 听JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1919940. doi:
2.Buss
听C锘�, Davis
听EP锘�, Muftuler
听LT锘�, Head
听K锘�, Sandman
听CA锘�. 听High pregnancy anxiety during mid-gestation is associated with decreased gray matter density in 6-9-year-old children.听锘� 听笔蝉测肠丑辞苍别耻谤辞别苍诲辞肠谤颈苍辞濒辞驳测. 2010;35(1):141-153. doi:
3.Wu
听Y锘�, Kapse
听K锘�, Jacobs
听M锘�,
听et al. 听Association of maternal psychological distress with in utero brain development in fetuses with congenital heart disease.听锘� 听JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(3):e195316. doi:
4.Qiu
听A锘�, Anh
听TT锘�, Li
听Y锘�,
听et al. 听Prenatal maternal depression alters amygdala functional connectivity in 6-month-old infants.听锘� 听Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5(2):e508. doi:
5.McKee
听KA锘�. 听The Effects of Prenatal Maternal Stress and Early Life Maternal Stress on Adolescent Hippocampal Morphology: Project Ice Storm. McGill University; 2018.
6.Sandman
听CA锘�, Buss
听C锘�, Head
听K锘�, Davis
听EP锘�. 听Fetal exposure to maternal depressive symptoms is associated with cortical thickness in late childhood.听锘� 听Biol Psychiatry. 2015;77(4):324-334. doi:
7.Lebel
听C锘�, Walton
听M锘�, Letourneau
听N锘�, Giesbrecht
听GF锘�, Kaplan
听BJ锘�, Dewey
听D锘�. 听Prepartum and postpartum maternal depressive symptoms are related to children鈥檚 brain structure in preschool.听锘� 听Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80(11):859-868. doi:
8.Buss
听C锘�, Davis
听EP锘�, Shahbaba
听B锘�, Pruessner
听JC锘�, Head
听K锘�, Sandman
听CA锘�. 听Maternal cortisol over the course of pregnancy and subsequent child amygdala and hippocampus volumes and affective problems.听锘� 听Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(20):E1312-E1319. doi:
9.Wen
听DJ锘�, Poh
听JS锘�, Ni
听SN锘�,
听et al. 听Influences of prenatal and postnatal maternal depression on amygdala volume and microstructure in young children.听锘� 听Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7(4):e1103. doi:
10.Qiu
听A锘�, Rifkin-Graboi
听A锘�, Chen
听H锘�,
听et al. 听Maternal anxiety and infants鈥� hippocampal development: timing matters.听锘� 听Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3(9):e306. doi:
11.Rifkin-Graboi
听A锘�, Bai
听J锘�, Chen
听H锘�,
听et al. 听Prenatal maternal depression associates with microstructure of right amygdala in neonates at birth.听锘� 听Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74(11):837-844. doi:
12.Sarkar
听S锘�, Craig
听MC锘�, Dell鈥橝cqua
听F锘�,
听et al. 听Prenatal stress and limbic-prefrontal white matter microstructure in children aged 6-9 years: a preliminary diffusion tensor imaging study.听锘� 听World J Biol Psychiatry. 2014;15(4):346-352. doi:
13.Scheinost
听D锘�, Kwon
听SH锘�, Lacadie
听C锘�,
听et al. 听Prenatal stress alters amygdala functional connectivity in preterm neonates.听锘� 听狈别耻谤辞颈尘补驳别 Clin. 2016;12:381-388. doi:
14.Van den Bergh
听BR锘�, Mulder
听EJH锘�, Mennes
听M锘�, Glover
听V锘�. 听Antenatal maternal anxiety and stress and the neurobehavioural development of the fetus and child: links and possible mechanisms鈥攁 review.听锘� 听Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2005;29(2):237-258. doi:
15.Cruceanu
听C锘�, Matosin
听N锘�, Binder
听EB锘�. 听Interactions of early-life stress with the genome and epigenome: from prenatal stress to psychiatric disorders.听锘� 听Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017;14:167-171. doi:
16.Laplante
听DP锘�, Barr
听RG锘�, Brunet
听A锘�,
听et al. 听厂迟谤别蝉蝉 during pregnancy affects general intellectual and language functioning in human toddlers.听锘� 听Pediatr Res. 2004;56(3):400-410. doi:
17.Buss
听C锘�, Davis
听EP锘�, Hobel
听CJ锘�, Sandman
听CA锘�. 听Maternal pregnancy-specific anxiety is associated with child executive function at 6-9 years age.听锘� 听厂迟谤别蝉蝉. 2011;14(6):665-676. doi:
18.van den Bergh
听BRH锘�, Dahnke
听R锘�, Mennes
听M锘�. 听Prenatal stress and the developing brain: risks for neurodevelopmental disorders.听锘� 听Dev Psychopathol. 2018;30(3):743-762. doi:
19.Van Essen
听DC锘�, Barch
听DM锘�. 听The human connectome in health and psychopathology.听锘� 听World Psychiatry. 2015;14(2):154-157. doi:
20.Jones
听SL锘�, Dufoix
听R锘�, Laplante
听DP锘�,
听et al. 听Larger amygdala volume mediates the association between prenatal maternal stress and higher levels of externalizing behaviors: sex specific effects in Project Ice Storm.听锘� 听Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:144. doi:
21.Davis
听EP锘�, Hankin
听BL锘�, Glynn
听LM锘�, Head
听K锘�, Kim
听DJ锘�, Sandman
听CA锘�. 听Prenatal maternal stress, child cortical thickness, and adolescent depressive symptoms.听锘� 听Child Dev. 2020;91(2):e432-e420. doi:
22.Thomason
听ME锘�, Hect
听J锘�, Waller
听R锘�,
听et al. 听Prenatal neural origins of infant motor development: associations between fetal brain and infant motor development.听锘� 听Dev Psychopathol. 2018;30(3):763-772. doi:
23.van den Heuvel
听MI锘�, Hect
听JL锘�, Smarr
听BL锘�,
听et al. 听Maternal stress during pregnancy alters fetal cortico-cerebellar connectivity in utero and increases child sleep problems after birth.听锘� 听Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2228. doi:
24.Middleton
听H锘�, Shaw
听I锘�. 听Distinguishing mental illness in primary care: we need to separate proper syndromes from generalised distress.听锘� 听叠惭闯. 2000;320(7247):1420-1421. doi:
25.Cohen
听S锘�, Kamarck
听T锘�, Mermelstein
听R锘�. 听A global measure of perceived stress.听锘� 听J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385-396. doi:
26.Andreou
听E锘�, Alexopoulos
听EC锘�, Lionis
听C锘�,
听et al. 听Perceived Stress Scale: reliability and validity study in Greece.听锘� 听Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(8):3287-3298. doi:
27.Gholipoor
听P锘�, Saboory
听E锘�, Ghazavi
听A锘�,
听et al. 听Prenatal stress potentiates febrile seizure and leads to long-lasting increase in cortisol blood levels in children under 2 years old.听锘� 听Epilepsy Behav. 2017;72:22-27. doi:
28.Spielberger
听CD锘�, Sydeman
听SJ锘�. State-trait anxiety inventory and state-trait anger expression inventory. In: Maruish
听ME锘�, ed. 听The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcome Assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1994:292-321.
29.Woolhouse
听H锘�, Mercuri
听K锘�, Judd
听F锘�, Brown
听SJ锘�. 听Antenatal mindfulness intervention to reduce depression, anxiety and stress: a pilot randomised controlled trial of the MindBabyBody program in an Australian tertiary maternity hospital.听锘� 听BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):369. doi:
30.Tendais
听I锘�, Costa
听R锘�, Conde
听A锘�, Figueiredo
听B锘�. 听Screening for depression and anxiety disorders from pregnancy to postpartum with the EPDS and STAI.听锘� 听Span J Psychol. 2014;17:E7. doi:
31.Cox
听JL锘�, Holden
听JM锘�, Sagovsky
听R锘�. 听Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale.听锘� 听Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782-786. doi:
32.Evans
听J锘�, Heron
听J锘�, Francomb
听H锘�, Oke
听S锘�, Golding
听J锘�. 听Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth.听锘� 听叠惭闯. 2001;323(7307):257-260. doi:
33.Pinto
听TM锘�, Caldas
听F锘�, Nogueira-Silva
听C锘�, Figueiredo
听B锘�. 听Maternal depression and anxiety and fetal-neonatal growth.听锘� 听J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017;93(5):452-459. doi:
34.Areias
听ME锘�, Kumar
听R锘�, Barros
听H锘�, Figueiredo
听E锘�. 听Comparative incidence of depression in women and men, during pregnancy and after childbirth: validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Portuguese mothers.听锘� 听Br J Psychiatry. 1996;169(1):30-35. doi:
35.Kainz
听B锘�, Steinberger
听M锘�, Wein
听W锘�,
听et al. 听Fast volume reconstruction from motion corrupted stacks of 2D slices.听锘� 听IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(9):1901-1913. doi:
36.Serag
听A锘�, Aljabar
听P锘�, Ball
听G锘�,
听et al. 听Construction of a consistent high-definition spatio-temporal atlas of the developing brain using adaptive kernel regression.听锘� 听狈别耻谤辞颈尘补驳别. 2012;59(3):2255-2265. doi:
37.Rueckert
听D锘�, Sonoda
听LI锘�, Denton
听ERE锘�,
听et al. Comparison and evaluation of rigid and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. SPIE conference proceedings. May 21, 1999. Accessed March 29, 2022.
38.Ge
听X锘�, Shi
听Y锘�, Li
听J锘�,
听et al. 听Development of the human fetal hippocampal formation during early second trimester.听锘� 听狈别耻谤辞颈尘补驳别. 2015;119:33-43. doi:
39.Jacob
听FD锘�, Habas
听PA锘�, Kim
听K锘�,
听et al. 听Fetal hippocampal development: analysis by magnetic resonance imaging volumetry.听锘� 听Pediatr Res. 2011;69(5 pt 1):425-429. doi:
40.Li
听G锘�, Wang
听L锘�, Shi
听F锘�,
听et al. 听Mapping longitudinal development of local cortical gyrification in infants from birth to 2 years of age.听锘� 听J Neurosci. 2014;34(12):4228-4238. doi:
41.Yun
听HJ锘�, Im
听K锘�, Yang
听J-J锘�, Yoon
听U锘�, Lee
听J-M锘�. 听Automated sulcal depth measurement on cortical surface reflecting geometrical properties of sulci.听锘� 听PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55977. doi:
42.Bayley
听N锘�. 听Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development: Bayley-III. Harcourt; 2006.
43.Carter
听AS锘�, Briggs-Gowan
听MJ锘�. 听ITSEA: Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment Examiner鈥檚 Manual. PsychCorp; 2006.
44.Anderson
听PJ锘�, De Luca
听CR锘�, Hutchinson
听E锘�, Roberts
听G锘�, Doyle
听LW锘�; Victorian Infant Collaborative Group. 听Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale.听锘� 听Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(4):352-356. doi:
45.Briggs-Gowan
听MJ锘�, Carter
听AS锘�, Irwin
听JR锘�, Wachtel
听K锘�, Cicchetti
听DV锘�. 听The Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment: screening for social-emotional problems and delays in competence.听锘� 听J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(2):143-155. doi:
46.Thurm
听A锘�, Farmer
听CA锘�, Manwaring
听S锘�, Swineford
听L锘�. 听1.10 Social-emotional and behavioral problems in toddlers with language delay.听锘� 听J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(10):S155. doi:
47.Abidin
听RR锘�, Abidin
听RR锘�. 听Parenting Stress Index (PSI). Pediatric Psychology Press; 1990.
48.Haskett
听ME锘�, Ahern
听LS锘�, Ward
听CS锘�, Allaire
听JC锘�. 听Factor structure and validity of the parenting stress index-short form.听锘� 听J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2006;35(2):302-312. doi:
49.P茅rez-Padilla
听J锘�, Men茅ndez
听S锘�, Lozano
听O锘�. 听Validity of the Parenting Stress Index Short Form in a sample of at-risk mothers.听锘� 听Eval Rev. 2015;39(4):428-446. doi:
50.Barroso
听NE锘�, Hungerford
听GM锘�, Garcia
听D锘�, Graziano
听PA锘�, Bagner
听DM锘�. 听Psychometric properties of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a high-risk sample of mothers and their infants.听锘� 听Psychol Assess. 2016;28(10):1331-1335. doi:
51.Reitman
听D锘�, Currier
听RO锘�, Stickle
听TR锘�. 听A critical evaluation of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) in a head start population.听锘� 听J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2002;31(3):384-392. doi:
52.Aracena
听M锘�, G贸mez
听E锘�, Undurraga
听C锘�, Leiva
听L锘�, Marinkovic
听K锘�, Molina
听Y锘�. 听Validity and reliability of the Parenting Stress Index Short Form (PSI-SF) applied to a Chilean sample.听锘� 听J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25(12):3554-3564. doi:
53.Lee
听SJ锘�, Gopalan
听G锘�, Harrington
听D锘�. 听Validation of the Parenting Stress Index鈥揝hort Form with minority caregivers.听锘� 听Res Soc Work Pract. 2016;26(4):429-440. doi:
54.Lu
听Y-C锘�, Kapse
听K锘�, Andersen
听N锘�,
听et al. 听Association between socioeconomic status and in utero fetal brain development.听锘� 听JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e213526. doi:
55.Benjamini
听Y锘�, Hochberg
听Y锘�. 听Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.听锘� 听J R Stat Soc B. 1995;57(1):289-300. doi:
56.Jung
听SJ锘�. 听Introduction to mediation analysis and examples of its application to real-world data.听锘� 听J Prev Med Public Health. 2021;54(3):166-172. doi:
57.Gavin
听NI锘�, Gaynes
听BN锘�, Lohr
听KN锘�, Meltzer-Brody
听S锘�, Gartlehner
听G锘�, Swinson
听T锘�. 听Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence.听锘� 听Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 pt 1):1071-1083. doi:
58.Bennett
听HA锘�, Einarson
听A锘�, Taddio
听A锘�, Koren
听G锘�, Einarson
听TR锘�. 听Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review.听锘� 听Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):698-709. doi:
59.Austin
听M-P锘�, Hadzi-Pavlovic
听D锘�, Leader
听L锘�, Saint
听K锘�, Parker
听G锘�. 听Maternal trait anxiety, depression and life event stress in pregnancy: relationships with infant temperament.听锘� 听Early Hum Dev. 2005;81(2):183-190. doi:
60.Buitelaar
听JK锘�, Huizink
听AC锘�, Mulder
听EJ锘�, de Medina
听PGR锘�, Visser
听GHA锘�. 听Prenatal stress and cognitive development and temperament in infants.听锘� 听Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24(1)(suppl):S53-S60. doi:
61.King
听S锘�, Laplante
听DP锘�. 听The effects of prenatal maternal stress on children鈥檚 cognitive development: Project Ice Storm.听锘� 听厂迟谤别蝉蝉. 2005;8(1):35-45. doi:
62.Evans
听TE锘�, Adams
听HHH锘�, Licher
听S锘�,
听et al. 听Subregional volumes of the hippocampus in relation to cognitive function and risk of dementia.听锘� 听狈别耻谤辞颈尘补驳别. 2018;178:129-135. doi:
63.Eichenbaum
听H锘�. 听贬颈辫辫辞肠补尘辫耻蝉: cognitive processes and neural representations that underlie declarative memory.听锘� 听狈别耻谤辞苍. 2004;44(1):109-120. doi:
64.de Toledo-Morrell
听L锘�, Dickerson
听B锘�, Sullivan
听MP锘�, Spanovic
听C锘�, Wilson
听R锘�, Bennett
听DA锘�. 听Hemispheric differences in hippocampal volume predict verbal and spatial memory performance in patients with Alzheimer鈥檚 disease.听锘� 听贬颈辫辫辞肠补尘辫耻蝉. 2000;10(2):136-142. doi:
65.Williams
听NA锘�, Villachan-Lyra
听P锘�, Marvin
听C锘�,
听et al. 听Anxiety and depression among caregivers of young children with Congenital Zika Syndrome in Brazil.听锘� 听Disabil Rehabil. 2021;43(15):2100-2109. doi:
66.Williams
听VJ锘�, Juranek
听J锘�, Cirino
听P锘�, Fletcher
听JM锘�. 听Cortical thickness and local gyrification in children with developmental dyslexia.听锘� 听Cereb Cortex. 2018;28(3):963-973. doi:
67.Sasaki
听M锘�. Single-photon emission computed tomography and electroencephalography findings in children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Patel
听VB锘�, Preedy
听VR锘�, Martin
听CR锘�, eds. 听Comprehensive Guide to Autism. Springer; 2014:929-945.
68.Csernansky
听JG锘�, Gillespie
听SK锘�, Dierker
听DL锘�,
听et al. 听Symmetric abnormalities in sulcal patterning in schizophrenia.听锘� 听狈别耻谤辞颈尘补驳别. 2008;43(3):440-446. doi:
69.McCann
听JC锘�, Hudes
听M锘�, Ames
听BN锘�. 听An overview of evidence for a causal relationship between dietary availability of choline during development and cognitive function in offspring.听锘� 听Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(5):696-712. doi:
70.Wu
听BTF锘�, Dyer
听RA锘�, King
听DJ锘�, Richardson
听KJ锘�, Innis
听SM锘�. 听Early second trimester maternal plasma choline and betaine are related to measures of early cognitive development in term infants.听锘� 听PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43448. doi:
71.Allen
听PJ锘�. 听Creatine metabolism and psychiatric disorders: does creatine supplementation have therapeutic value?听锘� 听Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(5):1442-1462. doi:
72.Merz
听EC锘�, Monk
听C锘�, Bansal
听R锘�,
听et al. 听Neonatal brain metabolite concentrations: associations with age, sex, and developmental outcomes.听锘� 听PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0243255. doi:
73.Lebel
听C锘�, MacKinnon
听A锘�, Bagshawe
听M锘�, Tomfohr-Madsen
听L锘�, Giesbrecht
听G锘�. 听Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.听锘� 听J Affect Disord. 2020;277:5-13. doi:
74.Preis
听H锘�, Mahaffey
听B锘�, Heiselman
听C锘�, Lobel
听M锘�. 听Pandemic-related pregnancy stress and anxiety among women pregnant during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.听锘� 听Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(3):100155. doi:
75.Evangelou
听IE锘�, du Plessis
听AJ锘�, Vezina
听G锘�, Noeske
听R锘�, Limperopoulos
听C锘�. 听Elucidating metabolic maturation in the healthy fetal brain using 1H-MR spectroscopy.听锘� 听AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(2):360-366. doi:
76.Scott
听JA锘�, Habas
听PA锘�, Kim
听K锘�,
听et al. 听Growth trajectories of the human fetal brain tissues estimated from 3D reconstructed in utero MRI.听锘� 听Int J Dev Neurosci. 2011;29(5):529-536. doi: