vlog

Object moved to here.

Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Bar/Tavern Closing Hours and Violent Crime | Violence | JAMA Internal Medicine | vlog

vlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUPnet). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2020. Accessed December 17, 2023.
2.
Popova S, Giesbrecht N, Bekmuradov D, Patra J. Hours and days of sale and density of alcohol outlets: impacts on alcohol consumption and damage: a systematic review. Alcohol Alcohol. 2009;44(5):500-516. doi:
3.
Campbell CA, Hahn RA, Elder R, et al; Task Force on Community Preventive Services. The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(6):556-569. doi:
4.
Sherk A, Stockwell T, Chikritzhs T, et al. Alcohol consumption and the physical availability of take-away alcohol: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the days and hours of sale and outlet density. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018;79(1):58-67. doi:
5.
Zhang X, Hatcher B, Clarkson L, et al. Changes in density of on-premises alcohol outlets and impact on violent crime, Atlanta, Georgia, 1997-2007. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015;12:E84. doi:
6.
Yu Q, Scribner R, Carlin B, et al. Multilevel spatio-temporal dual changepoint models for relating alcohol outlet destruction and changes in neighbourhood rates of assaultive violence. Geospat Health. 2008;2(2):161-172. doi:
7.
Fliss MD, Cox ME, Wallace JW, Simon MC, Knuth KB, Proescholdbell S. Measuring and mapping alcohol outlet environment density, clusters, and racial and ethnic disparities in Durham, North Carolina, 2017. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021;18:E89. doi:
8.
Trangenstein P, Gray C, Rossheim M, Sadler R, Jernigan D. Alcohol outlet clusters and population disparities. J Urban Health. 2020;97(1):123-136. doi:
9.
Hahn RA, Kuzara JL, Elder R, et al; Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Effectiveness of policies restricting hours of alcohol sales in preventing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(6):590-604. doi:
10.
Rammohan V, Hahn RA, Elder R, et al; Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Effects of dram shop liability and enhanced overservice law enforcement initiatives on excessive alcohol consumption and related harms: two community guide systematic reviews. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(3):334-343. doi:
11.
Mäkelä P, Warpenius K. Night-time is the right time? late-night drinking and assaults in Finnish public and private settings. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2020;39(4):321-329. doi:
12.
Duailibi S, Ponicki W, Grube J, Pinsky I, Laranjeira R, Raw M. The effect of restricting opening hours on alcohol-related violence. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(12):2276-2280. doi:
13.
Ejrnæs A, Scherg RH. Nightlife activity and crime: the impact of COVID-19 related nightlife restrictions on violent crime. J Crim Justice. 2022;79:101884. doi:
14.
Baltimore City–Alcohol Beverages–Licenses–Hours of Sale, S 571, Reg Sess (2020). Accessed July 20, 2023.
15.
Neighborhood health profiles–frequently asked questions. Baltimore City Health Department. Updated May 27, 2014. Accessed December 20, 2023.
16.
Baltimore Neighborhood Indicators Alliance. Accessed December 20, 2023.
17.
Bureau of the Census; Economics and Statistics Administration; US Department of Commerce. Census blocks and block groups. Geographic Areas Reference Manual. Bureau of the Census; 1994:11-1-11-19.
18.
Open Baltimore. City of Baltimore. Accessed December 17, 2023.
19.
Groff E. Exploring ‘near’: characterizing the spatial extent of drinking place influence on crime. Aust N Z J Criminol. 2011;44(2):156-179. doi:
20.
Violent crime. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2018. Accessed August 20, 2023.
21.
American Community Survey 2016-2020 5-year data release. US Census Bureau. 2022. Accessed June 12, 2023.
22.
Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. J Health Soc Behav. 2001;42(3):258-276. doi:
23.
Center for a Livable Future. Johns Hopkins University. Accessed January 15, 2023.
24.
Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):348-355. doi:
25.
Xuan Z, Yan S, Formica SW, et al. Association of implementation of postoverdose outreach programs with subsequent opioid overdose deaths among Massachusetts municipalities. JAMA Psychiatry. 2023;80(5):468-477. doi:
26.
Hallberg K, Williams R, Swanlund A, Eno J. Short comparative interrupted time series using aggregate school-level data in education research. Educ Res. 2018;47(5)295-306. doi:
27.
McCollister KE, French MT, Fang H. The cost of crime to society: new crime-specific estimates for policy and program evaluation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010;108(1-2):98-109. doi:
28.
Baltimore City Public Safety Accountability Dashboard. City of Baltimore. Accessed December 18, 2023.
29.
Gruenewald PJ, Remer L. Changes in outlet densities affect violence rates. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30(7):1184-1193. doi:
30.
Xu Y, Yu Q, Scribner R, Theall K, Scribner S, Simonsen N. Multilevel spatiotemporal change-point models for evaluating the effect of an alcohol outlet control policy on changes in neighborhood assaultive violence rates. Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2012;3(2):121-128. doi:
31.
Taylor N, Livingston M, Coomber K, et al. The combined impact of higher-risk on-license venue outlet density and trading hours on serious assaults in night-time entertainment precincts. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;223:108720. doi:
32.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms by limiting alcohol outlet density. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(6):570-571. doi:
33.
McCray C. Commentary: want to reduce crime? challenge the status quo. AFRO News. November 3, 2020. Accessed September 4, 2022.
34.
Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ. Nodes, Paths and Edges: Considerations on the Complexity of Crime and the Physical Environment. In: Walker JT, ed. Social, Ecological and Environmental Theories of Crime. Routledge; 2017:363-388.
35.
Jernigan DH, Sparks M, Yang E, Schwartz R. Using public health and community partnerships to reduce density of alcohol outlets. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E53. doi:
36.
Anderson E, Bernstein E, Xuan Z, Alter HJ. Inventing social emergency medicine: summary of common and critical research themes using a modified Haddon matrix. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;74(5S):S74-S77. doi:
37.
Hunter DJ. The complementarity of public health and medicine - achieving “the highest attainable standard of health”. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(6):481-484. doi:
Views 4,990
Original Investigation
Health Care Policy and Law
April 1, 2024

Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Bar/Tavern Closing Hours and Violent Crime

Author Affiliations
  • 1Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
  • 2Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 3Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 4Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(6):612-618. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0255
Key Points

Question What is the association of a state-mandated reduction of the number of hours when bars/taverns may sell or serve alcohol with prevention of violent crime near these outlets?

Findings This interrupted time series analysis of 13 bars/taverns in Baltimore, Maryland, found that reducing hours of alcohol sales from 6 am to 2 am to 9 am to 10 pm was associated with a 14% immediate decrease and 29% annual decrease in all violent crime compared with control areas. Furthermore, homicide and assault rates dropped by 48% and 31% annually, respectively.

Meaning These findings suggest that statutory restriction of hours of alcohol sales for bars/taverns may serve as a model for other cities looking to create safer neighborhoods.

Abstract

Importance It is well established that alcohol outlets (ie, places that sell alcohol) attract crime, particularly during late-night hours.

Objective To evaluate the association of Maryland Senate Bill 571 (SB571), which reduced the hours of sale for bars/taverns in 1 Baltimore neighborhood from 6 am to 2 am to 9 am to 10 pm, with violent crime within that neighborhood.

Design, Setting, and Participants This controlled interrupted time series analysis compared the change in violent crime density within an 800-ft buffer around bars/taverns in the treatment neighborhood (ie, subject to SB571) and 3 control areas with a similar mean baseline crime rate, alcohol outlet density, and neighborhood disadvantage score in the City of Baltimore between May 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. The interrupted time series using Poisson regression with overdispersion adjustment tested whether the violent crime density differed before vs after the policy change in the treatment neighborhood and whether this difference was localized to the treatment neighborhood.

Exposure Statutory reduction of bar/tavern selling hours from 20 to 13 hours per day in the treatment neighborhood.

Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was all violent crime, including homicide, robbery, aggravated and common assault, and forcible rape. Secondary outcomes were homicides and assaults. All violent crime measures summed the monthly incidents within 800 ft of bars/taverns from 8 pm to 4 am. For each outcome, a level change estimated the immediate change (first month after implementation), and a slope change estimated the sustained change after implementation (percent reduction after the first month). These level and slope changes were then compared between the treatment and control neighborhoods.

Results The treatment neighborhood included 13 bars/taverns (mean [SD] population, 528.3 [291.6] residents), and the control neighborhoods included 52 bars/taverns (mean [SD] population per census block, 809.0 [416.0] residents). There was a 14% immediate level decrease in density of all violent crimes the month after implementation of SB571; further, compared with the control neighborhoods, the slope of all violent crime density decreased by 29% per year in the treatment neighborhood after SB571 implementation (annualized incidence rate ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.97; P = .03). Similar results were seen for homicides and assaults. Several sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these results.

Conclusions and Relevance This study’s findings suggest that alcohol policies that reduce hours of sale could be associated with a reduction in violent crimes. Given these findings, SB571 may serve as a model for other cities looking to create safer neighborhoods.

×