ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Original Investigation
April 15, 2024

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors vs Sulfonylureas for Gout Prevention Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Metformin

Author Affiliations
  • 1Rheumatology & Allergy Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
  • 2The Mongan Institute, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
  • 3Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 4Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 5Diabetes Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
  • 6Division of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 7Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 8Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
  • 9University of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, Bethesda
  • 10Division of Gerontology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(6):650-660. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0376
Key Points

QuestionÌý What is comparative effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) vs sulfonylureas (most common second-line glucose-lowering therapy) associated with incident gout risk and recurrent flares among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving metformin monotherapy?

FindingsÌý In this population-based cohort study of 34 064 adults with T2D, SGLT2i use (vs sulfonylureas) was associated with lower risk of incident gout, major adverse cardiovascular events and heart failure, and lower rates of recurrent flares.

MeaningÌý The gout and cardiovascular benefits associated with SGLT2i in these target trial emulations may guide selection of glucose-lowering therapy in T2D patients, at risk for or with gout.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý Sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a revolutionary treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D) with cardiovascular, kidney, and serum urate-lowering benefits.

ObjectiveÌý To compare risk of incident gout and rate of recurrent flares between patients with T2D initiating SGLT2i vs sulfonylurea, most common second-line glucose-lowering therapy, when added to metformin monotherapy.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsÌý This sequential, propensity score-matched, new-user comparative effectiveness study using target trial emulation framework included adults with T2D receiving metformin monotherapy in a Canadian general population database from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2022.

ExposuresÌý Initiation of SGLT2i vs sulfonylurea.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý The primary outcome was incident gout diagnosis, ascertained by emergency department (ED), hospital, outpatient, and medication dispensing records. Secondary outcomes were gout-primary hospitalizations and ED visits and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), as well as recurrent flare rates among prevalent gout patients. Heart failure (HF) hospitalization was assessed as positive control outcome and osteoarthritis encounters as negative control. For target trial emulations, we used Cox proportional hazards and Poisson regressions with 1:1 propensity score matching (primary analysis) and overlap weighting (sensitivity analysis). The analysis was conducted from September to December, 2023.

ResultsÌý Among 34 604 propensity score matched adults with T2D initiating SGLT2i or sulfonylurea (20 816 [60%] male, mean [SD] age, 60 [12.4] years), incidence of gout was lower among SGLT2i initiators (4.27 events per 1000 person-years) than sulfonylurea initiators (6.91 events per 1000 person-years), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.48-0.80) and a rate difference (RD) of −2.64 (95% CI, −3.99 to −1.29) per 1000 person-years. Associations persisted regardless of sex, age, or baseline diuretic use. SGLT2i use was also associated with fewer recurrent flares among gout patients (rate ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82; and RD, −20.9; 95% CI, −31.9 to −10.0 per 1000 person-years). HR and RD for MACE associated with SGLT2i use were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77-0.98) and −3.58 (95% CI, −6.19 to −0.96) per 1000 person-years. For control outcomes, SGLT2i users had lower risk of HF (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.76), as expected, with no difference in osteoarthritis (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.94-1.34). Results were similar when applying propensity score overlap weighting.

ConclusionsÌý In this population-based cohort study, the gout and cardiovascular benefits associated with SGLT2i in these target trial emulations may guide selection of glucose-lowering therapy in patients with T2D, at risk for or already with gout.

Add or change institution
1 Comment for this article
EXPAND ALL
Interesting, and Not Unexpected
David Karpf, MD | Stanford University School of Medicine
While the results are interesting, but not unexpected, they will not change my clinical practice.

I have not used SUs in my patients with T2DM for more than 2 decades, as these drugs were approved in the 1950's simply because they lower blood glucose, but also cause weight gain, hypoglycemia, and likely impair beta-islet health, and probably increase cardiac risk. NOT the ideal drug, despite their low cost, for the average patient with T2DM. Much better to add a GLP-1 agonist, or a dual GLP-1/GIP agonist, or an SGLT-2 inhibitor, or even a TZD to
metformin. Based on both MOA as well as data.

In 2024, that's sort of like asking if statins are better than leeches for lowering CVD risk......

David B. Karpf, MD
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
×