ÌÇÐÄvlog

Object moved to here.

Fluoroscopy-Induced Skin Necrosis | Dermatology | JAMA Dermatology | ÌÇÐÄvlog

ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
1.
Bello ÌýYMHoss ÌýDKhachemoune ÌýAPhillips ÌýTJÌýDiagnostic dilemmas.ÌýÌý°Â´Ç³Ü²Ô»å²õ. 2000;1248-Ìý50
2.
Wagner ÌýLKMcNeese ÌýMDMarx ÌýMVSiegel ÌýELÌýSevere skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy: case report and review of the literature.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç±ô´Ç²µ²â. 1999;213773-Ìý776
3.
Shope ÌýTBÌýRadiation-induced skin injuries from fluoroscopy.ÌýÌý¸é²¹»å¾±´Ç²µ°ù²¹±è³ó¾±³¦²õ. 1996;161195-Ìý1199
4.
Lichtenstein ÌýDAKlapholz ÌýLVardy ÌýDA Ìýet al.ÌýÌýChronic radiodermatitis following cardiac catheterization.ÌýÌýArch Dermatol. 1996;132663-Ìý667
5.
Sovik ÌýEKlow ÌýNEHellesnes ÌýJLykke ÌýJÌýRadiation-induced skin injury after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.ÌýÌýActa Radiol. 1996;37305-Ìý307
6.
Miralbell ÌýRMaillet ÌýPCromptom ÌýNE Ìýet al.ÌýÌýSkin radionecrosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: dosimetric and biological assessment.ÌýÌýJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;101190-Ìý1194
7.
Poletti ÌýJLÌýRadiation injury to skin following a cardiac interventional procedure.ÌýÌýAustralas Radiol. 1997;4182-Ìý83
8.
Cascade ÌýPNPeterson ÌýLEWajszczuk ÌýWJMantel ÌýJÌýRadiation exposure to pateints undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.ÌýÌýAm J Cardiol. 1987;601401-Ìý1403
9.
Pattee ÌýPLJohns ÌýPCChambers ÌýRJÌýRadiation risk from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.ÌýÌýJ Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;221044-Ìý1051
10.
Timins ÌýJKLipoti ÌýJAÌýRadiation risks of high-dose fluoroscopy.ÌýÌýN J Med. 2000;9731-Ìý34
11.
Food and Drug Administration,ÌýImportant information for physicians and other healthcare professionals: recording information that identifies the potential for serious x-ray-induced skin injuries following fluoroscopically guided procedures.Ìý Rockville, Md Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration September15 1995;Available at:Site verified August 1, 2002
12.
Maxfield ÌýWSHanks ÌýGEPizzarelo ÌýDJBlackwell ÌýLHÌýAcute radiation syndrome.ÌýDalrymple ÌýGVGaulden ÌýMEKollmorgen ÌýGMVogel ÌýHHeds.ÌýMedical Radiation Biology Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders1973;190-Ìý197
13.
Food and Drug Administration,ÌýImportant information for physicians and other health care professionals: avoidance of serious x-ray-induced skin injuries to patients during fluoroscopically-guided procedures; September 9, 1994.ÌýAvailable at:Site verified August 1, 2002
14.
Wagner ÌýLKEifel ÌýPJGeise ÌýRAÌýPotential biological effects following high x-ray dose-interventional procedures.ÌýÌýJ Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;571-Ìý84
15.
Food and Drug Administration,ÌýPublic health advisory: avoidance of serious x-ray-induced skin injuries to patients during fluoroscopically-guided procedures.Ìý Rockville, Md Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration September30 1994;Available at:Site verified August 1, 2002
Critical Situations
FebruaryÌý2003

Fluoroscopy-Induced Skin Necrosis

Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(2):140-142. doi:10.1001/archderm.139.2.140

A 48-year-old obese man1 with a history of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and status post–quadruple bypass presented with an 8-month history of painful ulceration on the right midback. The initial lesion was described as a 4-cm square area of eroded eczematous dermatitis, which later developed 2 areas of ulceration that worsened despite various treatments, including oral and intralesional corticosteroids, oral antibiotic agents (erythromycin and ciprofloxacin), dapsone, and a hydrocolloid dressing.

Six months after onset, after initiation of high-dose prednisone therapy, examination revealed progression of the lesions into a large, necrotic ulcer measuring 4 × 4 × 3 cm, with copious amounts of expressible pus and foul-smelling discharge and muscle readily palpable on probing. Initial laboratory tests revealed a normal blood count, liver function, and serum protein electrophoresis.1 Wound culture revealed moderate Enterococcus species, diphtheroids, rare hemolytic streptococcus B, and α-hemolytic Streptococcus species.1 On immediate hospital admission, it was first discovered that he had undergone a complicated single-vessel angioplasty lasting over 2½ hours, during which he experienced angina and electrocardiogram changes, 1 month before his initial presentation to a dermatologist. Fluoroscopy-induced skin necrosis was likely the cause of his cutaneous ulceration. The wound was explored under general anesthesia, and debridement of the necrotic, infected material was performed. Histopathologically, there was extensive necrosis of the reticular dermis and subcutis, neutrophilic infiltrates, and numerous gram-positive cocci, occasionally in chains. Wound culture grew Enterococcus. Intravenous ampicillin sulbactam was administered, 3 g every 6 hours. A second surgical debridement was performed 1 week later and included a portion of fascia, which demonstrated serous exudation and inflammation. The depth of the wound was such that a latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap was necessary for closure.

×