ÌÇÐÄvlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Original Investigation
August 30, 2024

Prehospital Pulse-Dose Glucocorticoid in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The PULSE-MI Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 2Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 3Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 4Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen Denmark
  • 5Region Zealand Emergency Medical Services, University of Copenhagen, Naestved, Denmark
JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9(10):882-891. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.2298
Key Points

QuestionÌý In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), does prehospital pulse-dose glucocorticoid treatment have a cardioprotective effect?

FindingsÌý In this blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial that included 530 patients with STEMI, final infarct size at 3 months was 5% in the glucocorticoid group and 6% in the placebo group, a nonsignificant difference.

MeaningÌý Prehospital pulse-dose glucocorticoid did not reduce final infarct size in patients with STEMI.

Abstract

ImportanceÌý In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute inflammation is related to the extent of myocardial damage and may increase infarct size. Thus, administration of pulse-dose glucocorticoid in the very early phase of infarction may reduce infarct size.

ObjectiveÌý To determine the cardioprotective effect of prehospital pulse-dose glucocorticoid in patients with STEMI.

Design, Setting, and ParticipantsÌý This was a 1:1 investigator-initiated, blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted between November 14, 2022, and October 17, 2023, with last follow-up on January 17, 2024. Patients 18 years and older with less than 12 hours of acute chest pain and STEMI were included in the prehospital setting throughout the Region Zealand and Capital Region of Denmark and transferred to Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

InterventionÌý Patients were randomly allocated to intravenous glucocorticoid (methylprednisolone, 250 mg) or placebo in the prehospital setting.

Main Outcomes and MeasuresÌý The primary outcome was final infarct size on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 3 months. The power calculation was based on an anticipated final infarct size of 13%. Secondary outcomes included CMR outcomes on acute scan and at 3 months, peak of cardiac biomarkers, clinical end points at 3 months, and adverse events.

ResultsÌý Of 530 included patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [56-75] years; 418 male [78.9%]) with STEMI, 401 (76%) were assessed for the primary outcome, with 198 patients treated with glucocorticoid and 203 with placebo. Median final infarct size was similar in the treatment groups (glucocorticoid, 5%; IQR, 2%-11% vs placebo, 6%; IQR, 2%-13%; P = .24). Compared with placebo, the glucocorticoid group had smaller acute infarct size (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-1.00), less microvascular obstruction (relative risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), and greater acute left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference, 4.44%; 95% CI, 2.01%-6.87%). Other secondary outcomes were similar in both groups.

Conclusions and RelevanceÌý In patients with STEMI, treatment with prehospital pulse-dose glucocorticoid did not reduce final infarct size after 3 months. However, the trial was likely underpowered as the final infarct size was smaller than anticipated. The glucocorticoid group had improved acute parameters compared with placebo.

Trial RegistrationÌý ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

Add or change institution
1 Comment for this article
EXPAND ALL
Cardiac remodeling
Nunzio Russo, Clinical cardiologist | Centro clinico diagnostico "G.B.Morgagni" Catania
I remember when I was a medical student that some patients with inferior myocardial infarction complicated by type 1 second degree atrioventricular block were treated with methylprednisolone infusion(1). Later it was seen that corticosteroids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), except aspirin, were contraindicated in myocardial infarction because they delayed healing and influenced cardiac remodeling, making the infarcted area thin and susceptible to rupture(2). Recently several studies have been done to combat inflammation during a myocardial infarction, in particular with colchicine, with good results. The inflammatory process during and after a myocardial infarction is very complex in fact the hematopoietic system and other organs are involved, in addition to genetic and epigenetic factors that influence myocardial remodeling after the infarction(4-5). Furthermore, reading the latest edition of the book "Heart Disease" in the paragraph on cardiac remodeling in reference to corticosteroids and NSAIDs it is written: "Glucocorticoids and NSAIDs given early after MI can cause scar thinning and greater infarct expansion" (5). Today, percutaneous myocardial reperfusion has made great strides, but I believe that currently there is no place for the use of corticosteroids and NSAIDs, except aspirin, in myocardial infarction.

1 Henning, R. ∙ Becker, H. ∙ Vincent, J. ...
Use of methylprednisolone in patients following acute myocardial infarction
Chest. 1981; 79:186-193.

2 BRAUNWALD'S HEART DISEASE: A TEXTBOOK OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, Fifth edition-1997

3 Tardif J-C, Kouz S, Waters DD, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-dose Colchicine after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2019;381:2497–505. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1912388.

4 Kim EJ, Kim S, Kang DO, Seo 5HS. Metabolic activity of the spleen and bone marrow in patients with acute myocardial infarction evaluated by 18f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 May;7(3):454-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001093. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

5 Westman P.C, Lipinski M.J, Luger D, et al. Inflammation as a driver of adverse left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(17):2050–2060.

6 BRAUNWALD'S HEART DISEASE: A TEXTBOOK OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, TWELFTH EDITION-2022.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
READ MORE
×