糖心vlog

Object moved to here.

Hospital Networks and Value-Based Payment: Fertile Ground for Regionalizing High-Risk Surgery | Health Care Quality | JAMA | 糖心vlog

糖心vlog

[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Views 2,721
Viewpoint
翱肠迟辞产别谤听6, 2015

Hospital Networks and Value-Based Payment: Fertile Ground for Regionalizing High-Risk Surgery

Author Affiliations
  • 1Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
  • 2Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 3Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
JAMA. 2015;314(13):1335-1336. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.9803

Recently, 3 major medical centers鈥擠artmouth, Johns Hopkins, and the University of Michigan鈥攄eclared a 鈥渧olume pledge鈥 that restricts performance of 10 selected procedures to surgeons and hospitals that meet volume criteria.1 This followed an announcement by US News & World Report of a new analysis demonstrating poorer outcomes at low-volume hospitals.1 Both of these are derived from decades of research showing that high surgical volumes are associated with better outcomes, especially in high-risk procedures.2,3

Stakeholders have responded to the volume-outcome literature by calling for selective referral to high-volume facilities and in some cases enforced this by only reimbursing facilities that meet certain volume criteria.4 For the past decade, the Leapfrog Group (a coalition of health care purchasers) has called for 鈥渆vidence-based hospital referral鈥 to facilities meeting their volume targets. Medicare also set minimum volumes for bariatric surgery reimbursement in 2006 and for solid organ transplants in 2007.

×