vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at 6pm Weekday Evening
Coming up Soon
Advertisement

White House says judges balking at Trump's actions are provoking a 'constitutional crisis'

White House says judges balking at Trump's actions are provoking a 'constitutional crisis'
President Donald Trump says he will respect the court's decisions but is still forging ahead with another executive order shrinking the federal workforce. I abide by the courts and then I'll have to appeal it. Reversing course after questioning the legality of the court system, President Trump, alongside Elon Musk, defended moves to extensively cut the federal government. The people voted for major government reform. And that's what people are going to get. Musk brushing off concerns of unchecked power and transparency in the process. I fully expect to be scrutinized and get *** daily proctology exam. The president approving an order directing agencies hire no more than 1 employee for every 4 that leave, *** plan approved by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, along with *** monthly hiring report. Donald Trump is not free to bulldoze his way. Through the rule of law, lawmakers across Washington sounding the alarm over the lack of accountability while others defended the White House's actions, taking legitimate executive action to root out waste, fraud, and abuse in all these federal programs. The White House is also limiting more oversight. President Donald Trump fired the Inspector General of USAID after they warned that it could lose track of some $8.2 billion in funds if the agency is shut down. In Washington, I'm Amy Lou.
Advertisement
White House says judges balking at Trump's actions are provoking a 'constitutional crisis'
The White House said Wednesday that court rulings going against the Trump administration are coming from “judicial activists” on the bench whose decisions amount to a "constitutional crisis.”White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt made the comments as she pushed back against critics of Republican President Donald Trump's expansive actions slashing the government workforce and federal spending.“We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law," Leavitt said.Trump’s moves in the first weeks of his second term to overhaul the federal government and fulfill his campaign promises have been met with more than 50 lawsuits, with judges blocking some of his administration's moves at least temporarily. Top administration officials have responded by attacking the legitimacy of judicial oversight, one of the foundations of America’s democracy which is based on the separation of powers.The focus on the courts has intensified as the other long-standing check on the presidency, the Congress, is Republican-controlled and has largely gone along with Trump's unilateral actions, including his firing of government watchdogs.When asked Wednesday if the White House believes the courts have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions to Trump's orders, Leavitt said the rulings “have no basis in the law” and “have no grounds." She said the White House would comply with the courts but believed the administration would “ultimately be vindicated.”“This is part of a larger, concerted effort by Democrat activists, and nothing more than the continuation of the weaponization of justice against President Trump,” Leavitt said, referring to Trump's personal legal challenges, including the criminal trial in New York in which he was convicted last year.Judges have blocked, at least temporarily, his effort to end birthright citizenship, permit access to Treasury Department records by billionaire Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency and roll out a mass deferred resignation plan for federal workers.Musk, the world’s richest man who has been given far-reaching powers by Trump to shrink the federal government, has posted on social media that judges who rule against the administration should be impeached.“A corrupt judge protecting corruption. He needs to be impeached NOW!” Musk wrote about the judge in the Treasury Department case. Vice President JD Vance said Sunday on X, “ If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal. Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.”As court cases pile up, questions have arisen about whether Trump, pushing to expand the limits of presidential power, would comply with court rulings.Trump on Tuesday said he would, but suggested he would consider some kind of response to the judges and called their actions a “violation.”“It seems hard to believe that a judge could say, ‘We don’t want you to do that.’ So maybe we have to look at the judges because that’s very serious, I think it’s a very serious violation," Trump said.Leavitt made clear that Trump's team will also "seek every legal remedy to ultimately overturn these radical injunctions and ensure President Trump’s policies can be enacted,” she said.___Price reported from New York.

The White House said Wednesday that court rulings going against the Trump administration are coming from “judicial activists” on the bench whose decisions amount to a "constitutional crisis.”

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt made the comments as she pushed back against critics of Republican President Donald Trump's expansive actions slashing the government workforce and federal spending.

Advertisement

“We believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law," Leavitt said.

Trump’s moves in the first weeks of his second term to overhaul the federal government and fulfill his campaign promises have been met with more than 50 lawsuits, with judges blocking some of his administration's moves at least temporarily. Top administration officials have responded by attacking the legitimacy of judicial oversight, one of the foundations of America’s democracy which is based on the separation of powers.

The focus on the courts has intensified as the other long-standing check on the presidency, the Congress, is Republican-controlled and has largely gone along with Trump's unilateral actions, including his firing of government watchdogs.

When asked Wednesday if the White House believes the courts have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions to Trump's orders, Leavitt said the rulings “have no basis in the law” and “have no grounds." She said the White House would comply with the courts but believed the administration would “ultimately be vindicated.”

“This is part of a larger, concerted effort by Democrat activists, and nothing more than the continuation of the weaponization of justice against President Trump,” Leavitt said, referring to Trump's personal legal challenges, including the criminal trial in New York in which he was convicted last year.

Judges have blocked, at least temporarily, his effort to end birthright citizenship, permit access to Treasury Department records by billionaire Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency and roll out a mass deferred resignation plan for federal workers.

Musk, the world’s richest man who has been given far-reaching powers by Trump to shrink the federal government, has posted on social media that judges who rule against the administration should be impeached.

“A corrupt judge protecting corruption. He needs to be impeached NOW!” Musk wrote about the judge in the Treasury Department case. Vice President JD Vance said Sunday on X, “ If a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal. If a judge tried to command the attorney general in how to use her discretion as a prosecutor, that’s also illegal. Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.”

As court cases pile up, questions have arisen about whether Trump, pushing to expand the limits of presidential power, would comply with court rulings.

Trump on Tuesday said he would, but suggested he would consider some kind of response to the judges and called their actions a “violation.”

“It seems hard to believe that a judge could say, ‘We don’t want you to do that.’ So maybe we have to look at the judges because that’s very serious, I think it’s a very serious violation," Trump said.

Leavitt made clear that Trump's team will also "seek every legal remedy to ultimately overturn these radical injunctions and ensure President Trump’s policies can be enacted,” she said.

___

Price reported from New York.