vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at Noon Weekdays
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Twitter adopts 'poison pill' defense in Elon Musk takeover bid

Twitter adopts 'poison pill' defense in Elon Musk takeover bid
Elon musk. The eccentric billionaire is known for his divisive comments, some that have gotten him into both social and legal hot water, many of which were made on twitter and recently he invested in the social media platform, but now he wants the whole twitter hog offering to buy it outright, must offer the company $54.20 per share to buy twitter a company he already owns a 9.2% stake in meaning he's offering some $43 billion to take control of the company, musk says this is all in a bid to champion Free speech saying the company can neither thrive nor serve that purpose as it is writing in a letter to bret taylor, twitter's chairman quote, I invested in twitter as I believe in its potential to be the platform for free speech around the globe and I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy. However, he seems to finish his missive with a threat, adding my offer is my best and final offer and if it is not accepted I would need to reconsider my position as a shareholder. This comes after months of criticism of twitter by the SpaceX founder questioning their policies and threatening to create a competing social media platform
Advertisement
Twitter adopts 'poison pill' defense in Elon Musk takeover bid
Twitter said Friday that its board of directors has unanimously adopted a "poison pill" defense in response to Tesla CEO Elon Musk's proposal to buy the company and take it private.The move would allow existing Twitter shareholders to buy additional shares at a discount, thereby diluting Musk's stake in the company and making it harder for him to corral a majority of shareholder votes in favor of the acquisition.Twitter's plan would take effect if Musk's roughly 9% stake grows to 15% or more.Twitter said the poison pill would enable its investors to "realize the full value of their investment" by reducing the likelihood that any one person can gain control of the company without either paying shareholders a premium or giving the board more time to evaluate their offer. Such defenses, formally called shareholder rights plans, are used to prevent the takeover of a corporation by making any acquisition prohibitively expensive for the bidder.Even if it discourages his takeover attempt, Musk could still take over the company by waging a "proxy fight" in which shareholders vote to retain or dismiss the company's current directors. Twitter said the plan doesn't prevent the board from engaging with parties or accepting an acquisition proposal if it's in the company's best interests."They're gearing up for a battle here with Musk," said Daniel Ives, an analyst for Wedbush Securities. "They also have to give themselves time to try to find another potential buyer."Twitter revealed in a securities filing Thursday that Musk offered to buy the company outright for more than $43 billion, saying the social media platform "needs to be transformed as a private company" in order to build trust with its users."I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy," Musk said in the filing. "I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form."Later on Thursday, during an onstage interview at a TED event, he went even broader: "Having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization."Musk revealed in regulatory filings over recent weeks that he'd been buying Twitter shares in almost daily batches starting Jan. 31, ending up with a stake of about 9%. Only Vanguard Group controls more Twitter shares. A lawsuit filed Tuesday in New York federal court alleged that Musk illegally delayed disclosing his stake in the social media company so he could buy more shares at lower prices.After Musk announced his stake, Twitter quickly offered him a seat on its board on the condition that he would limit his purchases to no more than 14.9% of the company's outstanding stock. But the company said five days later that Musk had declined.Ives said Twitter's poison pill path is a predictable defensive maneuver but could be seen as a "sign of weakness" on Wall Street.

Twitter said Friday that its board of directors has unanimously adopted a "poison pill" defense in response to Tesla CEO Elon Musk's proposal to buy the company and take it private.

The move would allow existing Twitter shareholders to buy additional shares at a discount, thereby diluting Musk's stake in the company and making it harder for him to corral a majority of shareholder votes in favor of the acquisition.

Advertisement

Twitter's plan would take effect if Musk's roughly 9% stake grows to 15% or more.

Twitter said the poison pill would enable its investors to "realize the full value of their investment" by reducing the likelihood that any one person can gain control of the company without either paying shareholders a premium or giving the board more time to evaluate their offer. Such defenses, formally called shareholder rights plans, are used to prevent the takeover of a corporation by making any acquisition prohibitively expensive for the bidder.

Even if it discourages his takeover attempt, Musk could still take over the company by waging a "proxy fight" in which shareholders vote to retain or dismiss the company's current directors. Twitter said the plan doesn't prevent the board from engaging with parties or accepting an acquisition proposal if it's in the company's best interests.

"They're gearing up for a battle here with Musk," said Daniel Ives, an analyst for Wedbush Securities. "They also have to give themselves time to try to find another potential buyer."

Twitter revealed in a securities filing Thursday that Musk offered to buy the company outright for more than $43 billion, saying the social media platform "needs to be transformed as a private company" in order to build trust with its users.

"I believe free speech is a societal imperative for a functioning democracy," Musk said in the filing. "I now realize the company will neither thrive nor serve this societal imperative in its current form."

Later on Thursday, during an onstage interview at a TED event, he went even broader: "Having a public platform that is maximally trusted and broadly inclusive is extremely important to the future of civilization."

Musk revealed in regulatory filings over recent weeks that he'd been buying Twitter shares in almost daily batches starting Jan. 31, ending up with a stake of about 9%. Only Vanguard Group controls more Twitter shares. A lawsuit filed Tuesday in New York federal court alleged that Musk illegally delayed disclosing his stake in the social media company so he could buy more shares at lower prices.

After Musk announced his stake, Twitter quickly offered him a seat on its board on the condition that he would limit his purchases to no more than 14.9% of the company's outstanding stock. But the company said five days later that Musk had declined.

Ives said Twitter's poison pill path is a predictable defensive maneuver but could be seen as a "sign of weakness" on Wall Street.