vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at 10pm Sunday Night
Live Now
Advertisement

Prince Harry loses legal bid to pay for British police protection while in UK

Prince Harry loses legal bid to pay for British police protection while in UK
You've likely heard the near catastrophic car chase that Prince Harry Megan Markle and her mum were involved in on Tuesday night. But now you can hear it from the taxi driver himself. Taxi driver, Suk Churn Singh who goes by. Sonny said the trio got out of *** black car and into his taxi on East 67th street, *** paparazzi. They just coming out of nowhere and just started taking pictures and flashing. It was like *** like *** light show all of *** sudden and they were just about to give me the location. They never gave me the location where they were going. And then the security guard told me to circle back as we were circling back. You see the paparazzi car following my car and Prince Harry and his wife and the other lady. They were nervous and they looked scared. Reuters reports. *** spokesperson for Harry said an incident took place involving *** ring of highly aggressive paparazzi lasting over two hours. Sonny thinks the car chase happened before the couple entered his taxi because their emotions were pretty high because all of *** sudden they thought there was no paparazzi. Then paparazzi came out of nowhere.
Advertisement
Prince Harry loses legal bid to pay for British police protection while in UK
A London judge ruled Tuesday against Prince Harry in his efforts to pay for police protection when he visits Britain.A High Court judge rejected the Duke of Sussex’s assertion that the British government exceeded its authority when it denied him the right to hire police to provide security in the U.K.The British government stopped providing security after Harry and his wife, Meghan, quit their royal duties and moved to California in 2020. A lawyer for the government argued in court that it should allow the hiring of “police officers as private bodyguards for the wealthy.”Harry has said he doesn’t feel safe visiting Britain with his young children and has cited aggressive press photographers.The case was argued last week on the same day Harry and Meghan sought cover from paparazzi in a New York police station after a spokesperson said they had been involved in a “near catastrophic car chase” with photographers after a gala event.No one was injured and no citations were given, but police said photographers made it challenging for the couple to get where they were going.Harry is separately challenging the decision to deny him government-paid security. That lawsuit is the only one of five active legal cases he has in London courts that is not against British tabloid publishers over allegations of libel or phone hacking.He is due to testify next month in an ongoing trial against the publisher of the Daily Mirror over allegations it used illegal means to gather material for dozens of articles about the duke, dating back as far as the 1990s.

A London judge ruled Tuesday against Prince Harry in his efforts to pay for police protection when he visits Britain.

A High Court judge rejected the Duke of Sussex’s assertion that the British government exceeded its authority when it denied him the right to hire police to provide security in the U.K.

Advertisement

The British government stopped providing security after Harry and his wife, Meghan, quit their royal duties and moved to California in 2020. A lawyer for the government argued in court that it should allow the hiring of “police officers as private bodyguards for the wealthy.”

Harry has said he doesn’t feel safe visiting Britain with his young children and has cited aggressive press photographers.

The case was argued last week on the same day Harry and Meghan sought cover from paparazzi in a New York police station after a spokesperson said they had been involved in a “near catastrophic car chase” with photographers after a gala event.

No one was injured and no citations were given, but police said photographers made it challenging for the couple to get where they were going.

Harry is separately challenging the decision to deny him government-paid security. That lawsuit is the only one of five active legal cases he has in London courts that is not against British tabloid publishers over allegations of libel or phone hacking.

He is due to testify next month in an ongoing trial against the publisher of the Daily Mirror over allegations it used illegal means to gather material for dozens of articles about the duke, dating back as far as the 1990s.