vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at 5pm Weekday Evening
Live Now
Advertisement

Iowa House bill could remove civil rights protections for transgender Iowans

Iowa House bill could remove civil rights protections for transgender Iowans
JUST A LITTLE BIT. WE’RE LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT. THANK YOU. RIGHT NOW, STATE LAWMAKERS ARE CONSIDERING A BILL THAT COULD REMOVE CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTIONS FOR TRANSGENDER IOWANS. IT WOULD ALSO REMOVE A RULE ALLOWING FOR THE IOWANS TO CHANGE THEIR GENDER ON THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATE. vlog EXPLAINS WHY SOME PEOPLE ARE WORRIED. A BILL CREATING CONCERN FOR LGBTQ PLUS SUPPORTERS IS HANDS DOWN THE WORST, THE MOST HARMFUL PIECE OF LEGISLATION I HAVE EVER SEEN COME OUT OF THE IOWA LEGISLATURE IS DRAWING PRAISE FROM GROUPS CALLING FOR MORE LAWS TO CREATE DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN. HOUSE BILL 242 IS SET TO MOVE TO SUBCOMMITTEE, WHERE LAWMAKERS WILL CONSIDER STRIKING ALL MENTIONS OF GENDER IDENTITY FROM THE IOWA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. STATE LAW CURRENTLY PREVENTS DECISIONS RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT, HOUSING, PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS, EDUCATION AND CREDIT FROM BEING IMPACTED BY SOMEONE’S GENDER IDENTITY. IOWA IS ONE OF 23 STATES PLUS THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WHERE THE PROTECTION, ACCORDING TO THE HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN. BUT THE BILL AUTHOR, REPUBLICAN REPRESENTATIVE STEPHEN HOLT, SAYS IOWA IS THE ONLY STATE THAT HAS ALSO PASSED OTHER RESTRICTIONS THAT WOULD LIMIT TRANSGENDER IOWANS ACCESS TO GENDERED FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES. WE’RE THE ONLY STATE THAT HAS THAT IN PLACE, BUT ALSO HAS GENDER IDENTITY AS PROTECTED CLASS IN IOWA, CODE, AND LEGAL EXPERTS TELL US THAT THOSE THINGS CANNOT COHABITATE FOR VERY LONG BECAUSE THEY CONFLICT. THE SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATION, THE FAMILY LEADER, SUPPORTS THE LEGISLATION. WHEN ASKED TO COMMENT ON THE BILL, THE FAMILY LEADER TOLD vlog THERE ARE GOOD REASONS FOR OUR LAWS TO PROTECT WOMEN AND CHILDREN, AND WE SHOULDN’T FORCE BUSINESS OWNERS, EMPLOYERS OR STATE AGENCIES TO IMPLEMENT POLICIES THAT DISREGARD THE REALITY OF BIOLOGICAL SEX. ONE IOWA DIRECTOR OF POLICY AND ADVOCACY SAYS THIS CHANGE COULD HARM TRANSGENDER IOWANS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER PERSON PROTECTED BY THE IOWA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT. IF FOLKS DISCOVER THAT IT IS RELATIVELY EASY TO REMOVE AN ENTIRE CLASS OF PEOPLE FROM THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT WITH NO RESISTANCE, THEY’RE GOING TO COME AFTER OTHER CLASSES AS WELL.
Advertisement
Iowa House bill could remove civil rights protections for transgender Iowans
A bill that would strike all mentions of gender identity for the Iowa Civil Rights Act is heading to subcommittee for consideration. The law currently prevents decisions relating to employment, housing, public accommodations, education, and credit from being impacted by someone's gender identity. If HSB 242 is signed into law as currently written, those protections would no longer extend to transgender Iowans. It would also redefine sex as "the state of being either male or female as observed or clinically verified at birth," and make gender a synonym for the term, "not a synonym or short hand expression for gender identity."One Iowa's director of policy and advocacy, Kenan Crow, said the changes could bring harm to transgender people in Iowa."This is hands down the worst, the most harmful piece of legislation I have ever seen come out of the Iowa legislature" Crow said. "It is terrifying, to a lot of the folks in the community, and it has the potential to upend, transgender Iowans lives in a number of different ways."When asked to comment on the bill, social conservative organization The Family Leader, gave the following statement to vlog:"Clearly there ARE circumstances when it is necessary and right to differentiate between a woman … and a man who merely believes he’s a woman.It's common sense:A man has no place in a bathroom or locker room with our wives and daughters.A woman in prison shouldn't be forced to share a cell with a biological man.Taxpayers shouldn't be forced to pay for so-called "gender transition" surgeries.There are good reasons for our laws to protect women and children. And we shouldn't force business owners, employers, or state agencies to implement policies that disregard the reality of biological sex.It’s time to come back to our senses. It is right and good for our laws to recognize the real difference between men and women."Iowa is one of 23 states, and the district of Columbia, that extend civil rights protections to gender Identity according to the Human Rights Campaign. The classification was added in 2007, when democrats controlled the Iowa House, Senate and Governor's office. If Iowa removes gender identity from it's Civil Rights Act, it would be the first state to do so. I would also be the second state, behind Wisconsin, to protect people based on their sexual orientation, but not gender identity.However, bill author Dennison Rep. Steven Holt (R), said Iowa is the only state that also passed restrictions limiting transgender Iowans access to gendered facilities and activities, but maintains them as a protected class."We're the only state that has that in place, but also has gender identity as a protected class in Iowa code." Holt said. "Legal experts tell us that those things cannot cohabitate for very long because they conflict." At the time of publication, a time is not yet scheduled for the subcommittee hearing on HSB 242. » Subscribe to vlog's YouTube page» Download the free vlog app to get updates on the go: Apple | Google Play

A bill that would strike all mentions of gender identity for the Iowa Civil Rights Act is heading to subcommittee for consideration.

The law currently prevents decisions relating to employment, housing, public accommodations, education, and credit from being impacted by someone's gender identity. If HSB 242 is signed into law as currently written, those protections would no longer extend to transgender Iowans.

Advertisement

It would also redefine sex as "the state of being either male or female as observed or clinically verified at birth," and make gender a synonym for the term, "not a synonym or short hand expression for gender identity."

One Iowa's director of policy and advocacy, Kenan Crow, said the changes could bring harm to transgender people in Iowa.

"This is hands down the worst, the most harmful piece of legislation I have ever seen come out of the Iowa legislature" Crow said. "It is terrifying, to a lot of the folks in the community, and it has the potential to upend, transgender Iowans lives in a number of different ways."

When asked to comment on the bill, social conservative organization The Family Leader, gave the following statement to vlog:

"Clearly there ARE circumstances when it is necessary and right to differentiate between a woman … and a man who merely believes he’s a woman.

It's common sense:

  • A man has no place in a bathroom or locker room with our wives and daughters.
  • A woman in prison shouldn't be forced to share a cell with a biological man.
  • Taxpayers shouldn't be forced to pay for so-called "gender transition" surgeries.

There are good reasons for our laws to protect women and children. And we shouldn't force business owners, employers, or state agencies to implement policies that disregard the reality of biological sex.

It’s time to come back to our senses. It is right and good for our laws to recognize the real difference between men and women."

Iowa is one of 23 states, and the district of Columbia, that extend civil rights protections to gender Identity according to the . The classification was added in 2007, when democrats controlled the Iowa House, Senate and Governor's office.

If Iowa removes gender identity from it's Civil Rights Act, it would be the first state to do so. I would also be the second state, behind Wisconsin, to protect people based on their sexual orientation, but not gender identity.

However, bill author Dennison Rep. Steven Holt (R), said Iowa is the only state that also passed restrictions limiting transgender Iowans access to gendered facilities and activities, but maintains them as a protected class.

"We're the only state that has that in place, but also has gender identity as a protected class in Iowa code." Holt said. "Legal experts tell us that those things cannot cohabitate for very long because they conflict."

At the time of publication, a time is not yet scheduled for the subcommittee hearing on HSB 242.

»

» Download the free vlog app to get updates on the go: |