vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at 10pm Weeknights
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

‘It’s the First Amendment, stupid’: Federal judge blasts DeSantis administration for threats against TV stations

‘It’s the First Amendment, stupid’: Federal judge blasts DeSantis administration for threats against TV stations
CHECKING ONE OF THE ADS AGAINST AMENDMENT 4. WELL, THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA IS CURRENTLY RUNNING A 60ND COMMERCIAL. >> THAT MAKES A LOT OF CLAIMS ABOUT AMENDMENT 4 WHICH PROTECTS ABORTION RIGHTS FOR WOMEN. I'M BREAKING DOWN EACH ONE AND GETTING YOU THE TRUTH. >> WARNING SIGNS CAN BE HARD TO SPOT BUT DANGEROUS TO IGNORE THIS AD FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA ARE URGING PEOPLE TO VOTE NO, UNLIKE OTHER AMENDMENTS. AMENDMENT 4 HAS NO DEFINITIONS. IT'S TRUE THAT THERE ARE NO DEFINITIONS IN AMENDMENT 4, BUT THERE ARE SELDOM DEFINITIONS IN CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS. THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED AS LONG AS THEY'RE REVIEWED BY THE STATE SUPREME COURT FOR CLARITY AND THE COURTS APPROVED AMENDMENT 4. SO WE'RE RATING THIS CLAIM MISLEADING, CLEAN, TOO, WITHOUT DEFINITIONS. THESE WORDS CAN MEAN ALMOST ANYTHING ENABLING ABORTIONS AT ANY TIME FOR ALMOST ANY REASON. HERE'S THE AMENDMENT. AND WHILE IT IS BRIEF LIKE MOST, IF PAST, THE COURTS WILL FILL IN THE GAPS. FLORIDA LAW IS CLEAR AND ALREADY HAS DEFINITIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, VIABILITY IS DEFINED AS UP TO THE POINT A CHILD CAN SURVIVE ON ITS OWN OUTSIDE THE. SO WE RATE THE CLAIM MISLEADING CLAIM 3 AMENDMENT 4 GOES FAR BEYOND ROE V WADE AND POWERING ABORTION CLINICS TO APPROVE LATE TERM ABORTIONS WITHOUT DOCTORS EVEN AFTER SCIENCE SAYS THE BABY CAN FEEL PAIN. OUR METER SAYS THIS IS FALSE. AND HERE'S WHY. >> CURRENT FLORIDA LAW REQUIRES ONLY PHYSICIANS TO PERFORM AN ABORTION AND THAT DOESN'T CHANGE. AND AGAIN, THE LANGUAGE IN THE AMENDMENT DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT ANYONE BUT A DOCTOR WOULD PERFORM AN ABORTION CLAIM FOR AMENDMENT 4. EVEN CUTS PARENTS OUT OF THE LOOP REMOVING FLORIDA'S PARENTAL CONSENT LAW AND REPLACING IT WITH NOTIFICATION. SO WHAT LOOKS LIKE A SAFEGUARD IS ACTUALLY A LOOPHOLE BRING UP THE METER AND WE'RE GOING TO READ THIS FALL'S BECAUSE ARTICLE 10 SECTION, 22 OF FLORIDA LAW ALREADY REQUIRES PARENTAL NOTIFICATION AND AGAIN, READ THE AMENDMENT. IT STATES THAT PARENTAL NOTIFICATION WON'T BE IMPACTED PARENTAL CONSENT LAW IS ALSO REQUIRED FOLLOWING A STATE SUPREME COURT RULING IN APRIL. WHETHER IT'S FRAUD OR JUST FLAWED AMENDMENT 4 IS NOT WHAT IT SEEMS. NO DEFINITIONS, NO DOCTORS, NO PARENTAL CONSENT. >> NOW THE ADS SIMPLY IGNORES THE FACTS WHICH WE SHOWED YOU WRITTEN STATE LAW. WE RATE THE AD AS MOSTLY FALSE IN THE STUDIO. DAVE ELIAS NBC, 2
Advertisement
‘It’s the First Amendment, stupid’: Federal judge blasts DeSantis administration for threats against TV stations
“To keep it simple for the State of Florida: it’s the First Amendment, stupid.”That’s what a federal judge wrote Thursday as he sided with local TV stations in an extraordinary dispute over a pro-abortion rights television ad.Chief U.S. District Judge Mark E. Walker of the Northern District of Florida granted a temporary restraining order against Florida’s surgeon general after the state health department threatened to bring criminal charges against broadcasters airing the ad.The controversy stems from a campaign ad by the group Floridians Protecting Freedom, which is behind the “Yes on 4 Campaign,” promoting a ballot measure that seeks to overturn Florida’s six-week abortion ban by enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution.In the 30-second ad, a brain cancer survivor named Caroline says the state law would have prevented her from receiving a life-saving abortion.“The doctors knew that if I did not end my pregnancy, I would lose my baby, I would lose my life, and my daughter would lose her mom,” she says on camera. “Florida has now banned abortions, even in cases like mine.”The state health department – part of Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration, which has aggressively campaigned against the pro-abortion amendment – said the ad’s claims are “false” and “dangerous” to the public health.John Wilson, the health department’s general counsel, sent cease-and-desist letters to multiple television stations airing the ad. Floridians Protecting Freedom then filed a lawsuit against Wilson and the state’s surgeon general, Joseph Ladapo, saying the threats amounted to “unconstitutional coercion and viewpoint discrimination” and pressed the court to bar the state from following up on threats to sue.On Thursday, the judge agreed the health department’s threats were “viewpoint discrimination” and wrote that the group presented “a substantial likelihood of proving an ongoing violation of its First Amendment rights through the threatened direct penalization of its political speech.”The judge’s order, which is valid through Oct. 29, effectively bars Ladapo from intimidating local stations for airing the Amendment 4 ad.Walker’s granting of the restraining order comes less than a week after Wilson resigned from his post. In a letter obtained by the Tampa Bay Times and Miami Herald, Wilson wrote that “a man is nothing without his conscience,” adding that “it has become clear in recent days that I cannot join you on the road that lies before the agency.”Wilson did not mention the ad controversy.The state’s health department continues to assert that the abortion rights ad “unequivocally false and detrimental to public health in Florida.” Jae Williams, the department’s communications director, told CNN on Thursday that “the media continues to ignore the truth that Florida’s heartbeat protection law always protects the life of a mother and includes exceptions for victims of rape, incest, and human trafficking.”Some medical experts have said otherwise. “Florida’s extreme abortion ban has created an unworkable legal landscape that endangers both patients and clinicians,” the nonprofit group Physicians for Human Rights stated in a report last month. The ban “leads to preventable suffering” and “compels clinicians to deviate from established standards of care and medical ethics,” the group said.The health department’s threats were so chilling that WINK, a CBS affiliate, pulled the ad from its broadcasts, Florida Politics reported. Other stations have continued to air the ad, some as recently as Thursday evening, according to the TVEyes video search service.The broadcasters were supported by Jessica Rosenworcel, the Democratic chair of the FCC, who said earlier this month that “threats against broadcast stations for airing content that conflicts with the government’s views are dangerous and undermine the fundamental principle of free speech.”

“To keep it simple for the State of Florida: it’s the First Amendment, stupid.”

That’s what a federal judge wrote Thursday as he sided with local TV stations in an extraordinary dispute over a pro-abortion rights television ad.

Advertisement

Chief U.S. District Judge Mark E. Walker of the Northern District of Florida after the state health department threatened to bring criminal charges against broadcasters airing the ad.

The controversy stems from a campaign ad by the group Floridians Protecting Freedom, which is behind the “Yes on 4 Campaign,” promoting a ballot measure that seeks to overturn Florida’s six-week abortion ban by enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution.

In the , a brain cancer survivor named Caroline says the state law would have prevented her from receiving a life-saving abortion.

“The doctors knew that if I did not end my pregnancy, I would lose my baby, I would lose my life, and my daughter would lose her mom,” she says on camera. “Florida has now banned abortions, even in cases like mine.”

The state health department – part of Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration, which has aggressively campaigned against the pro-abortion amendment – said the ad’s claims are “false” and “dangerous” to the public health.

John Wilson, the health department’s general counsel, sent cease-and-desist letters to multiple television stations airing the ad. Floridians Protecting Freedom then filed a lawsuit against Wilson and the state’s surgeon general, Joseph Ladapo, saying the threats amounted to “unconstitutional coercion and viewpoint discrimination” and pressed the court to bar the state from following up on threats to sue.

On Thursday, the judge agreed the health department’s threats were “viewpoint discrimination” and wrote that the group presented “a substantial likelihood of proving an ongoing violation of its First Amendment rights through the threatened direct penalization of its political speech.”

, which is valid through Oct. 29, effectively bars Ladapo from intimidating local stations for airing the Amendment 4 ad.

Walker’s granting of the restraining order comes less than a week after Wilson resigned from his post. In by the Tampa Bay Times and Miami Herald, Wilson wrote that “a man is nothing without his conscience,” adding that “it has become clear in recent days that I cannot join you on the road that lies before the agency.”

Wilson did not mention the ad controversy.

The state’s health department continues to assert that the abortion rights ad “unequivocally false and detrimental to public health in Florida.” Jae Williams, the department’s communications director, told CNN on Thursday that “the media continues to ignore the truth that Florida’s heartbeat protection law always protects the life of a mother and includes exceptions for victims of rape, incest, and human trafficking.”

Some medical experts have said otherwise. “Florida’s extreme abortion ban has created an unworkable legal landscape that endangers both patients and clinicians,” the nonprofit group Physicians for Human Rights stated in a report last month. The ban “leads to preventable suffering” and “compels clinicians to deviate from established standards of care and medical ethics,” the group said.

The health department’s threats were so chilling that WINK, a CBS affiliate, pulled the ad from its broadcasts, . Other stations have continued to air the ad, some as recently as Thursday evening, according to the TVEyes video search service.

The broadcasters were supported by Jessica Rosenworcel, the Democratic chair of the FCC, who said earlier this month that “threats against broadcast stations for airing content that conflicts with the government’s views are dangerous and undermine the fundamental principle of free speech.”