vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at 6pm Saturday Evening
Live Now
Advertisement

President Biden says he stands 'squarely behind' Afghanistan decision

President Biden says he stands 'squarely behind' Afghanistan decision
Good afternoon, I want to speak today. The unfolding situation in Afghanistan. The developments that have taken place in the last week and the steps we're taking to address the rapidly evolving events. My national security team and I have been closely monitoring the situation on the ground in Afghanistan and moving quickly to execute the plans we had put in place to respond to every constituency, including and contingency, including the rapid collapse we're seeing now. I'll speak more in a moment about the specific steps we're taking. But I want to remind everyone how we got here and what America's interests are in Afghanistan. We want to Afghanistan almost 20 years ago with clear goals, Get those who attacked us on September 11, 2001 and make sure al Qaeda could not use Afghanistan as a base from which to attack us again. We did that. We severely degraded al Qaeda in Afghanistan. We never gave up the hunt for Osama bin laden and we got him. That was a decade ago. Our mission in Afghanistan was never supposed to have been nation building. It was never supposed to be creating a unified centralized democracy. Our only vital national interests in Afghanistan remains today. What has always been preventing an a terrorist attack on american homeland. I've argued for many years that are missing should be narrowly focused on counterterrorism, not counterinsurgency or nation building. That's why I opposed the surge when it was proposed in 2009 when I was vice president and that's why is President, I'm adamant. We focus on the threats we face today in 2021. Not yesterday's threats today, The terrorist threat has metastasized well beyond Afghanistan. Al Shabaab in Somalia, al Qaeda in the Arabian peninsula, Al Nusra in Syria, Isis, attempting to create a caliphate in Syria and Iraq and establishing affiliates in multiple countries in Africa and Asia. These threats warren our attention and our resources. We conduct effective counterterrorism missions against terrorist groups in multiple countries where we don't have permanent military presence if necessary. We'll do the same in Afghanistan. We've developed counterterrorism over the horizon capability that will allow us to keep our eyes firmly fixed on the direct threats to the United States in the region and act quickly and decisively if needed. When I came into office, I inherited a deal that president trump negotiated with the Taliban under his agreement. US forces would be out of Afghanistan. by May one, just a little over three months after I took office, U. S. Forces had already drawn down during the trump administration from roughly 15,500 american forces. The 2500 troops in country And the Taliban was at his strongest militarily since 2001. The choice I had to make as your president. It was either to follow through on that agreement or be prepared to go back to fighting the Taliban in the middle of the spring fighting season. There would have been no ceasefire after May one. There was no agreement protecting our forces. After May one There was no status quo of stability without American casualties. After May one there was only a cold reality. Have you either following through on the agreement to withdraw our forces or escalating the conflict and sending thousands more american troops back into combat in Afghanistan, lurching Into the 3rd decade of conflict. I stand squarely behind my decision. After 20 years, I've learned the hard way that there was never a good time to withdraw us forces. That's why we're still there. We were clear eyed about the risk we plan for every contingency, but I always promised the american people that I will be straight with you. The truth is, this did unfold more quickly than we had anticipated. So what's happened, Afghanistan political leaders gave up and fled the country. The Afghan military collapsed sometime without trying to fight. If anything, the developments of the past week reinforced that ending us military involvement. Afghanistan now was the right decision. American troops cannot and should not be fighting in a war and dying in a war that Afghan forces are not willing to fight for themselves. We spent over a trillion dollars. We trained and equipped an afghan military force With some 300,000 strong, incredibly well equipped, a force larger in size than the militaries of many of our NATO allies. We gave them every tool they could need. We pay their salaries provided for the maintenance of the air force. Something that Taliban doesn't have. Taliban does not have an air force. We provided close air support. We gave them every chance to determine their own future. We could not provide them was the will to fight for that future with some very brave and capable Afghan special forces units and soldiers. But if Afghanistan is unable to mount any real resistance of the Taliban now there is no chance that one year, one more year, five more years or 20 more years the U. S. Military boots on the ground would have made any difference. Here's what I believe to my core. It is wrong to order american troops to step up in Afghanistan's own armed forces would not. The political leaders of Afghanistan were unable to come together for the good of their people. Unable to negotiate for the future of their country. When the chips were down, they would never have done so while U. S. Troops remained in Afghanistan bearing the brunt of the fighting for them and our true strategic competitors, china and Russia would love nothing more than the United States to continue to funnel billions of dollars in resources and attention and the stabilized in Afghanistan indefinitely. Mhm. When I hosted President Ghani and Chairman Abdullah at the White House in june and again when I spoke by phone to Ghani in july we had very frank conversations, we talked about how Afghanistan should prepare to fight their civil wars. After the U. S. Military departed to clean up the corruption in government. So the government could function for the Afghan people. We talked extensively about the need for Afghan leaders to unite politically. They fail to do any of that. I also urge them to engage in diplomacy to seek a political settlement with the Taliban. This advice was flatly refused. Mr Ghani insists that the Afghan forces would fight, but obviously he was wrong. Fine left again to ask of those who argue that we should stay. How many more generations of America's daughters and sons would you have me send to fight Afghans Afghanistan's civil war when Afghan troops will not, how many more lives american lives? Is it worth how many endless rows of headstones at Arlington National Cemetery? I'm clear on my answer, I will not repeat the mistakes we've made in the past. Mistake of staying and fighting indefinitely in a conflict that is not in the national interest of the United States, of doubling down on the civil war in a foreign country of attempting to remake a country through the endless military deployments of U. S. Forces. Those are the mistakes we cannot continue to repeat because we have significant vital interests in the world that we cannot afford to ignore. I also want to acknowledge how painful this is to so many of us. The scenes were seen in Afghanistan, their gut wrenching particularly for our veterans. Our diplomats humanitarian workers for anyone who has spent time on the ground working to support the Afghan people for those who have lost loved ones in Afghanistan and for americans have fought and served in the country, serve our country in Afghanistan. This is deeply, deeply personal. It is for me as well. I've worked on these issues as long as anyone I've been throughout Afghanistan during this war. While the war was going on from Kabul to Kandahar to the Kunar Valley, I've traveled there on four different occasions. I met with the people I spoken to the leaders. I spent time with our troops and I came to understand firsthand what was and was not possible in Afghanistan. So now we're focused on what is possible. We will continue to support the afghan people. We will lead with our diplomacy or international influence and a humanitarian aid will continue to push for regional diplomacy and engagement to prevent violence and instability will continue to speak out for the basic rights of the Afghan people of women and girls. Just as we speak out all over the world. I've been clear, the human rights must be the center of our foreign policy, not the periphery, but the way to do. It is not through endless military deployments. It's with our diplomacy or economic tools and rallying the world to join us. Let me lay out the current mission in Afghanistan. I was asked to authorize and I did 6000 US troops to deploy to Afghanistan for the purpose of assisting in the departure of us and allied civilian personnel from Afghanistan and to evacuate our Afghan allies and vulnerable afghans to safety outside of Afghanistan. Our troops are working to secure the airfield and ensure continued operation. Both the civilian and military flights we're taking over air traffic control. We have safely shut down our embassy and transferred our diplomats. Our our diplomatic presence is now consolidated at the airport as well. Over the coming days, we intend to transport out thousands of american citizens. We've been living and working in Afghanistan. We'll also continue to support the safe departure of civilian personnel. The civilian personnel of our allies who are still serving in Afghanistan Operation allies, refugee, which I announced back in july has already moved 2000 afghans are eligible for special immigration visas and their families to the United States. In the coming days, U. S. Military will provide assistance to move to move more s ivy eligible afghans and their families out of Afghanistan. We're also expanding refugee access to cover other vulnerable afghans who worked for embassy, US non government agencies, uh US non governmental organizations and afghans who otherwise are at great risk in U. S. News agencies. I know there are concerns about why we did not begin evacuating afghans civilians sooner Part of the answer and some of the afghans did not want to leave earlier. Still hopeful for their country and part of it because the afghan government and its supporters discouraged us from organizing a mass exodus. To avoid triggering as they said, a crisis of confidence. American troops are performing this mission as professionally and as effectively as they always do. But it is not without risks. As we carry out this departure, we have made it clear to the Taliban if they attack our personnel or disrupt our operation, the U. S. Presence will be swift and the response will be swift and forceful. We will defend our people with devastating force if necessary. Our current military mission. We shorten time, lemonades but scope and focused on its objectives. Get our people and our allies as safely as quickly as possible. And once we have completed this mission, we will conclude our military withdrawal will end America's longest war After 20 long years of bloodshed. The events we're seeing now are sadly proof no amount of military force would ever deliver a stable united, secure Afghanistan has known in history as the graveyard of empires. What's happening now. Could just as easily happened five years ago Or 15 years in the future. You have to be honest, our mission in Afghanistan is taking many missteps, made many missteps over the past two decades. I'm now the 4th American president. To preside over war in Afghanistan. two Democrats and two Republicans. I will not pass this responsibly on responsibility onto a 5th president. I will not mislead the american people by claiming that just a little more time in Afghanistan will make all the difference. Nor will I shrink from my share of responsibility for where we are today and how we must move forward from here. I am president of the United States of America and the buck stops with me. I'm deeply saddened by the facts we now face. But I do not regret my decision to end America's war fighting in Afghanistan and maintain a laser focus on our counterterrorism missions there and other parts of the world. Our mission to degrade the terrorist threat of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and kill Osama bin laden was a success. Our decades long effort to overcome centuries of history and permanently changed and remake Afghanistan was not and I wrote and believed it never could be. I cannot and will not ask our troops to fight on endlessly another in another country's civil war, taking casualties, suffering life shattering injuries, leaving families broken by grief and loss. This is not in our national security interest. It is not what the american people want. It is not what our troops who have sacrificed so much over the past two decades deserve. I made a commitment to the american people when I ran for president, but I bring America's military involvement Afghanistan to an end wall. It's been hard and messy and yes, far from perfect. I've honored that commitment. More importantly, I made a commitment to the brave men and women who serve this nation. That I wasn't going to ask them to continue to risk their lives in the military action. That should have ended long ago. Our leaders did that in Vietnam. When I got here as a young man, I will not do it in Afghanistan. I know my decision will be criticized, but I would rather take all that criticism. Then passed this decision on to another president of the United States yet another on the 5th 1. Mhm. Because it's the right one, it's the right decision for our people. The right one for our brave service members who risk their lives serving our nation. That's the right one for America. Thank you. May God protect our troops, our diplomats and all brave americans serving in harm's way new york.
Advertisement
President Biden says he stands 'squarely behind' Afghanistan decision
A defiant President Joe Biden rejected blame Monday for chaotic scenes of Afghans clinging to U.S. military planes in Kabul in a desperate bid to flee their home country after the Taliban's easy victory over an Afghan military that America and NATO allies had spent two decades trying to build.At the White House, Biden called the anguish of trapped Afghan civilians "gut wrenching" and conceded the Taliban had achieved a much faster takeover of the country than his administration had expected. The U.S. rushed in troops to protect its own evacuating diplomats and others at the Kabul airport.But the president expressed no second thoughts about his decision to stick by the U.S. commitment, formulated during the Trump administration, to end America's longest war, no matter what."I stand squarely behind my decision" to finally withdraw U.S. combat forces, Biden said, while acknowledging the Afghan collapse played out far more quickly than the most pessimistic public forecasts of his administration. "This did unfold more quickly than we anticipated," he said.Despite declaring "the buck stops with me" — Biden placed almost all blame on Afghans for the shockingly rapid Taliban conquest.His grim comments were his first in person to the world since the biggest foreign policy crisis of his still-young presidency. Emboldened by the U.S. withdrawal, Taliban fighters swept across the country last week and captured the capital, Kabul, on Sunday, sending U.S.-backed Afghan President Ashraf Ghani fleeing the country.Biden said he had warned Ghani — who was appointed Afghanistan's president in a U.S.-negotiated agreement — to be prepared to fight a civil war with the Taliban after U.S. forces left. "They failed to do any of that," he said.Internationally, the spectacle of the Taliban takeover and the chaos of the evacuation effort was raising doubts about America's commitments to its allies.German Chancellor Angela Merkel said it was "bitter" to watch the complete collapse in a war that Germany and other NATO partners had followed the U.S. into after the 9/11 attacks, which were plotted from Afghanistan. The humiliating scenes seemed certain to give comfort to American foes. At home, it all sparked sharp criticism, even from members of Biden's own political party, who implored the White House to do more to rescue fleeing Afghans, especially those who had aided the two-decade American military effort. "We didn't need to be seeing the scenes that we're seeing at Kabul airport with our Afghan friends climbing aboard C-17s," said Rep. Jason Crow, a Colorado Democrat and Iraq and Afghanistan military veteran.He said that is why he and others called for the evacuations to start months ago. "It could have been done deliberately and methodically," Crow said. "And we think that that was a missed opportunity."Besides the life-and-death situation in Kabul, the timing of the crisis was unfortunate for Biden's domestic efforts at home. It could well weaken his political standing as he works to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and build congressional support for a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill and an even larger expansion of the social safety net.Still, the focus at home and abroad on Monday was on Kabul's airports, where thousands of Afghans trapped by the sudden Taliban takeover rushed the tarmac and clung to U.S. military planes deployed to fly out staffers of the U.S. Embassy, which shut down Sunday, and others. At least seven people died in the chaos, including two who clung to the wheels of a C-17 and plunged to the tarmac as it flew away, and two others shot by U.S. forces. Americans said the men were armed but that there was no evidence that they were Taliban.With tens of thousands of U.S. citizens and others as well as Afghans desperate to escape, Biden insisted the U.S. had done all it could to plan.In fact, Afghan leaders had asked the U.S. not to publicly play up any advance efforts to evacuate former military translators, female activists and others most at risk from the Taliban, saying that in itself could trigger what the Afghans said could be "a crisis of confidence," Biden said.Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said late Monday that the U.S., which had taken charge of air traffic control at the Kabul airport, had resumed airlifts out, after suspending them due to the morning's stampedes onto the runways by frightened Afghans.Kirby said U.S. forces are planning to wrap up their oversight of the evacuation by Aug. 31, also the date Biden has set for officially ending the U.S. combat role in Afghanistan.The U.S. hopes to fly out up to 5,000 people a day once more of 6,000 U.S troops being deployed to secure the evacuation arrive, and once more transport planes can land, he said.Biden pledged to work to also evacuate private U.S. citizens and citizens of foreign governments, as well as Afghans who formerly worked with Americans in the country, journalists, prominent women and other Afghans considered most at-risk of Taliban reprisal.As of July, the U.S. had a visa application backlog of 18,000 former Afghan employees alone who were seeking a haven in the United States, and had been able to evacuate only a few thousand in what was meant to be a sped-up process over the last month.Veterans groups and nonprofit groups that worked with Afghan women appealed to Biden on Monday to keep troops at the Kabul airport at least through the end of the month, to keep the escape route out of Taliban hands.—AP reporters Matthew Lee, Eric Tucker and Mary Clare Jalonick in Washington and Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin contributed to this report.

A defiant President Joe Biden rejected blame Monday for chaotic scenes of Afghans clinging to U.S. military planes in Kabul in a desperate bid to flee their home country after the Taliban's easy victory over an Afghan military that America and NATO allies had spent two decades trying to build.

At the White House, Biden called the anguish of trapped Afghan civilians "gut wrenching" and conceded the Taliban had achieved a much faster takeover of the country than his administration had expected. The U.S. rushed in troops to protect its own evacuating diplomats and others at the Kabul airport.

Advertisement

But the president expressed no second thoughts about his decision to stick by the U.S. commitment, formulated during the Trump administration, to end America's longest war, no matter what.

"I stand squarely behind my decision" to finally withdraw U.S. combat forces, Biden said, while acknowledging the Afghan collapse played out far more quickly than the most pessimistic public forecasts of his administration. "This did unfold more quickly than we anticipated," he said.

Despite declaring "the buck stops with me" — Biden placed almost all blame on Afghans for the shockingly rapid Taliban conquest.

His grim comments were his first in person to the world since the biggest foreign policy crisis of his still-young presidency. Emboldened by the U.S. withdrawal, Taliban fighters swept across the country last week and captured the capital, Kabul, on Sunday, sending U.S.-backed Afghan President Ashraf Ghani fleeing the country.

Biden said he had warned Ghani — who was appointed Afghanistan's president in a U.S.-negotiated agreement — to be prepared to fight a civil war with the Taliban after U.S. forces left. "They failed to do any of that," he said.

Internationally, the spectacle of the Taliban takeover and the chaos of the evacuation effort was raising doubts about America's commitments to its allies.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said it was "bitter" to watch the complete collapse in a war that Germany and other NATO partners had followed the U.S. into after the 9/11 attacks, which were plotted from Afghanistan. The humiliating scenes seemed certain to give comfort to American foes.

At home, it all sparked sharp criticism, even from members of Biden's own political party, who implored the White House to do more to rescue fleeing Afghans, especially those who had aided the two-decade American military effort.

"We didn't need to be seeing the scenes that we're seeing at Kabul airport with our Afghan friends climbing aboard C-17s," said Rep. Jason Crow, a Colorado Democrat and Iraq and Afghanistan military veteran.

He said that is why he and others called for the evacuations to start months ago. "It could have been done deliberately and methodically," Crow said. "And we think that that was a missed opportunity."

Besides the life-and-death situation in Kabul, the timing of the crisis was unfortunate for Biden's domestic efforts at home. It could well weaken his political standing as he works to combat the COVID-19 pandemic and build congressional support for a $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill and an even larger expansion of the social safety net.

Still, the focus at home and abroad on Monday was on Kabul's airports, where thousands of Afghans trapped by the sudden Taliban takeover rushed the tarmac and clung to U.S. military planes deployed to fly out staffers of the U.S. Embassy, which shut down Sunday, and others.

At least seven people died in the chaos, including two who clung to the wheels of a C-17 and plunged to the tarmac as it flew away, and two others shot by U.S. forces. Americans said the men were armed but that there was no evidence that they were Taliban.

With tens of thousands of U.S. citizens and others as well as Afghans desperate to escape, Biden insisted the U.S. had done all it could to plan.

In fact, Afghan leaders had asked the U.S. not to publicly play up any advance efforts to evacuate former military translators, female activists and others most at risk from the Taliban, saying that in itself could trigger what the Afghans said could be "a crisis of confidence," Biden said.

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said late Monday that the U.S., which had taken charge of air traffic control at the Kabul airport, had resumed airlifts out, after suspending them due to the morning's stampedes onto the runways by frightened Afghans.

Kirby said U.S. forces are planning to wrap up their oversight of the evacuation by Aug. 31, also the date Biden has set for officially ending the U.S. combat role in Afghanistan.

The U.S. hopes to fly out up to 5,000 people a day once more of 6,000 U.S troops being deployed to secure the evacuation arrive, and once more transport planes can land, he said.

Biden pledged to work to also evacuate private U.S. citizens and citizens of foreign governments, as well as Afghans who formerly worked with Americans in the country, journalists, prominent women and other Afghans considered most at-risk of Taliban reprisal.

As of July, the U.S. had a visa application backlog of 18,000 former Afghan employees alone who were seeking a haven in the United States, and had been able to evacuate only a few thousand in what was meant to be a sped-up process over the last month.

Veterans groups and nonprofit groups that worked with Afghan women appealed to Biden on Monday to keep troops at the Kabul airport at least through the end of the month, to keep the escape route out of Taliban hands.

AP reporters Matthew Lee, Eric Tucker and Mary Clare Jalonick in Washington and Kirsten Grieshaber in Berlin contributed to this report.